Showing posts with label England. Show all posts
Showing posts with label England. Show all posts
Monday, 22 May 2017
Random English labels
I'm afraid you're not even going to get some of my pathetic sketches this time. Just the briefest of bullshit and then some pretty labels.
The reason? I've another trip coming up. And I need to bash out some quick posts.
The reason I have so many fresh labels is another matter. I've been making a real effort to get through my floor beers. That's the beers clogging up the living room floor. It's incredible how quickly it can change from just a couple to 150. I've no idea how that can happen. It's almost as if they're breeding.
Below are labels from some of the English beers in the pile I've finished off. It's stuff I picked up on a couple of my UK trips. To be honest, I have trouble remembering all the different trips. Thus year will be even worse. Atlanta and Asheville later this week. Edinburgh a week or so after I return from that. Sheffield at the end of June. Berlin and Newark in August. Washington DC in September, maybe. Chile in October. I think that's about all I currently have planned.
Incidentally, despite my already crzay schedule, if you're a brewer or home brewer club in Europe and would like to host a Macbeth event, get in touch. I'm sure I can squeeze the odd weekend in.
The reason? I've another trip coming up. And I need to bash out some quick posts.
The reason I have so many fresh labels is another matter. I've been making a real effort to get through my floor beers. That's the beers clogging up the living room floor. It's incredible how quickly it can change from just a couple to 150. I've no idea how that can happen. It's almost as if they're breeding.
Below are labels from some of the English beers in the pile I've finished off. It's stuff I picked up on a couple of my UK trips. To be honest, I have trouble remembering all the different trips. Thus year will be even worse. Atlanta and Asheville later this week. Edinburgh a week or so after I return from that. Sheffield at the end of June. Berlin and Newark in August. Washington DC in September, maybe. Chile in October. I think that's about all I currently have planned.
Incidentally, despite my already crzay schedule, if you're a brewer or home brewer club in Europe and would like to host a Macbeth event, get in touch. I'm sure I can squeeze the odd weekend in.
Monday, 21 May 2012
Beer production 1900 - 1927
Bailey (of Boak and Bailey) has helpfully transformed one of my dull accumulations of numbers into a prettty chart. It's much easier to see the trends in this pictorial form.
I've just noticed that the English line looks rather like the side view of a trench. How appropriate, given the trough represents the war years.
One note. They didn't stop brewing in Ireland in 1922. That's just the year the southern counties became independent.
I've just noticed that the English line looks rather like the side view of a trench. How appropriate, given the trough represents the war years.
One note. They didn't stop brewing in Ireland in 1922. That's just the year the southern counties became independent.
Sunday, 13 May 2012
Scottish beer exports 1916 - 1933
I warned you there would be more numbers. I have these episodes where I go statistic crazy for a week or two. The family have learnt to ignore when an attack strikes. Feel free to do the same if numbers aren't your suitcase.
Below are the sort-of figures for Scottish exports that I thromised. Why sort-of? Because, while exports clearly make up the bulk of the figure, there are other categories of duty-free beer included. They're the best I can do, basically. In the last column I've included the actual amount of beer exported.
Well, almost, because it's in standard barrels. As are all the other figures. That's a nominal 36 gallon barrel with an OG of 1055. So if the beer A actually had an OG of 1027.5, 1 standard barrel of beer A would be two bulk barrels. Is that clear?
In most years the duty-free beer figure is about 10% large than the exported figure. Though there are a couple of years where it's around 20%. Very roughly, knocking 10% off the duty-free number should get us close to the number of standard barrels exported.
The period 1921 to 1930 is revealing. Scottish exports increased steadily while English exports remained fairly flat, but with a small decrease. 1927 being the turning point, where Scottish exports, probably for the first time ever, outstripped English ones.
That's an incredible achievement for Scottish brewing. remember that they were competing against the likes of Bass, Worthington and Whitbread. Much larger companies with far larger resources. Even the Scottish giants - McEwan, William Younger and Tennent - were much smaller concerns than their large English rivals.
Here's the table:
I don't I've quite worked the number mania out of my system yet. Prepare yourselves for more.
Below are the sort-of figures for Scottish exports that I thromised. Why sort-of? Because, while exports clearly make up the bulk of the figure, there are other categories of duty-free beer included. They're the best I can do, basically. In the last column I've included the actual amount of beer exported.
Well, almost, because it's in standard barrels. As are all the other figures. That's a nominal 36 gallon barrel with an OG of 1055. So if the beer A actually had an OG of 1027.5, 1 standard barrel of beer A would be two bulk barrels. Is that clear?
In most years the duty-free beer figure is about 10% large than the exported figure. Though there are a couple of years where it's around 20%. Very roughly, knocking 10% off the duty-free number should get us close to the number of standard barrels exported.
The period 1921 to 1930 is revealing. Scottish exports increased steadily while English exports remained fairly flat, but with a small decrease. 1927 being the turning point, where Scottish exports, probably for the first time ever, outstripped English ones.
That's an incredible achievement for Scottish brewing. remember that they were competing against the likes of Bass, Worthington and Whitbread. Much larger companies with far larger resources. Even the Scottish giants - McEwan, William Younger and Tennent - were much smaller concerns than their large English rivals.
Here's the table:
| Beer Exported on Drawback and Free of Duty | |||||
| England and Wales | Scotland | Ireland | United Kingdom | UK exports | |
| 1916 | 581,947 | 174,595 | 46,371 | 802,913 | |
| 1917 | 314,333 | 73,896 | 30,095 | 418,324 | |
| 1918 | 174,408 | 30,379 | 16,185 | 220,972 | |
| 1919 | 470,794 | 195,995 | 33,821 | 700,610 | |
| 1920 | 312,868 | 146,726 | 16,698 | 485,292 | 390,248 |
| 1921 | 215,719 | 92,193 | 12,648 | 320,560 | |
| 1922 | 207,882 | 117,978 | 10,239 | 336,099 | 260,914 |
| 1923 | 176,913 | 108,544 | 2,270 | 287,727 | 257,454 |
| 1924 | 158,373 | 132,889 | 753 | 292,015 | 264,003 |
| 1925 | 180,731 | 145,603 | 415 | 326,749 | 290,824 |
| 1926 | 178,155 | 168,609 | 305 | 347,069 | 283,033 |
| 1927 | 156,258 | 179,242 | 232 | 338,732 | 287,445 |
| 1928 | 170,728 | 193,255 | 363,983 | 328,029 | |
| 1929 | 176,381 | 223,638 | 400,019 | 352,942 | |
| 1930 | 173,988 | 204,345 | 378,333 | 328,524 | |
| 1931 | 159,278 | 147,527 | 306,805 | 289,516 | |
| 1932 | 136,231 | 133,240 | 269,471 | 244,525 | |
| 1933 | 117,363 | 126,254 | 243,617 | 217,981 | |
| Sources: | |||||
| Brewers' Journal 1919, page 65. | |||||
| Brewers' Journal 1922, page 71. | |||||
| Brewers' Journal 1925, page 83. | |||||
| Brewers' Journal 1928, page 87. | |||||
| Brewers' Journal 1928, page 87. | |||||
| Brewers' Journal 1934, page 162. | |||||
| Brewers' Almanack 1928, p. 115 | |||||
| Brewers' Almanack 1955, p. 57 | |||||
I don't I've quite worked the number mania out of my system yet. Prepare yourselves for more.
Friday, 11 May 2012
British beer production and average OG 1900 - 1933
It seems like there's something I've not done for a while. Something that used to be very important. (No, it's not humour or entertainment.) I remember - a big fat juicy table, dripping with number grease. Best put that right.
My weekend was great fun. I spent it scanning 1920's and 1930's editions of the Brewers' Journal. "What are you doing with those stinky books, dad?" Lexie asked. "Harvesting numbers." "Dad, that sounds really boring."
It's not exactly my idea of fun, either. But the information I grab is. There was some really useful stuff, hidden away in the old Journals. That's filled a few holes in my Brewers' Almanack derived tables. Like the one below. The larger set of data has revealed some intriguing points.
The first thing I'd like to point out is the disparity in average OG in the different parts of the UK on the eve of WW I. The average OG in Scotland was four points lower than in England and a massive 18 points lower than in Ireland. You can blame Guinness for the high figure in Ireland. Their flagship Extra Stout had an OG of 1075º.
But what I find really fascinating is the difference in the gravity dropped caused by WW I. Between 1914 and 1921, the average OG in Scotland only dropped 5 points. While in England it dropped by 10 points. That's a fall in gravity of 19.3% in England and just 11.2% in Scotland. I wonder why that was.
I've a possible explanation. Exports. The proportion of beer exported was much higher in Scotland. And what was the difference between export and domestic beer between the wars? Export beer continued to be brewed at pre-WW I strengths.
I've sort of got figures for Scottish exports in the 1920's and 1930's. Sort of. I've figures for the number of barrels upon which no duty was charges. The usual reason for that is that the beer was exported. But that's not the only one. The figures for duty-free barrels is about 10% higher than the figures for beer exported. I'll be returning to these figures in detail later, but one point is very significant: after 1927 Scotland was exporting more beer than England.
Wondering why beer production fell so much in 1932 and 1933? A disastrous increase in beer tax which caused output to fall so much that, in fact, less tax was collected. There's a lesson there.
I'll be returning to numbers soon. I've neglected them for far too long.
My weekend was great fun. I spent it scanning 1920's and 1930's editions of the Brewers' Journal. "What are you doing with those stinky books, dad?" Lexie asked. "Harvesting numbers." "Dad, that sounds really boring."
It's not exactly my idea of fun, either. But the information I grab is. There was some really useful stuff, hidden away in the old Journals. That's filled a few holes in my Brewers' Almanack derived tables. Like the one below. The larger set of data has revealed some intriguing points.
The first thing I'd like to point out is the disparity in average OG in the different parts of the UK on the eve of WW I. The average OG in Scotland was four points lower than in England and a massive 18 points lower than in Ireland. You can blame Guinness for the high figure in Ireland. Their flagship Extra Stout had an OG of 1075º.
But what I find really fascinating is the difference in the gravity dropped caused by WW I. Between 1914 and 1921, the average OG in Scotland only dropped 5 points. While in England it dropped by 10 points. That's a fall in gravity of 19.3% in England and just 11.2% in Scotland. I wonder why that was.
I've a possible explanation. Exports. The proportion of beer exported was much higher in Scotland. And what was the difference between export and domestic beer between the wars? Export beer continued to be brewed at pre-WW I strengths.
I've sort of got figures for Scottish exports in the 1920's and 1930's. Sort of. I've figures for the number of barrels upon which no duty was charges. The usual reason for that is that the beer was exported. But that's not the only one. The figures for duty-free barrels is about 10% higher than the figures for beer exported. I'll be returning to these figures in detail later, but one point is very significant: after 1927 Scotland was exporting more beer than England.
| Beer produced by brewers for sale and average OG 1900 - 1933 | ||||||||
| England | Scotland | Ireland | United Kingdom | |||||
| Year | bulk barrels | average OG | bulk barrels | average OG | bulk barrels | average OG | bulk barrels | average OG |
| 1900 | 32,146,769 | - | 2,289,048 | - | 2,669,225 | - | 37,105,042 | 1054.93 |
| 1905 | 30,594,189 | 1052.54 | 2,021,374 | 1049.6 | 2,799,960 | 1063.49 | 35,415,523 | 1053.23 |
| 1910 | 29,284,045 | 1052.3 | 1,956,659 | 1048.48 | 3,059,210 | 1064.78 | 34,299,914 | 1053.2 |
| 1911 | 29,679,204 | 1052.03 | 2,028,710 | 1048.18 | 3,215,374 | 1065.22 | 34,923,288 | 1053.02 |
| 1912 | 30,991,776 | 1051.76 | 2,153,569 | 1048.11 | 3,330,174 | 1065.43 | 36,475,519 | 1052.72 |
| 1913 | 30,758,800 | 1051.52 | 2,119,666 | 1047.85 | 3,417,851 | 1065.73 | 36,296,317 | 1052.64 |
| 1914 | 31,737,384 | 1051.69 | 2,288,481 | 1047.67 | 3,532,902 | 1065.93 | 37,558,767 | 1052.80 |
| 1915 | 29,310,783 | 1051.16 | 2,042,477 | 1046.85 | 3,412,520 | 1065.93 | 34,765,780 | 1052.35 |
| 1916 | 26,914,428 | 1050.49 | 1,917,148 | 1046.45 | 3,279,032 | 1066.43 | 32,110,608 | 1051.88 |
| 1917 | 25,497,825 | 1047.01 | 1,816,003 | 1043.16 | 2,850,170 | 1065.69 | 30,163,998 | 1048.54 |
| 1918 | 16,340,250 | 1038.25 | 1,141,114 | 1036.74 | 1,603,679 | 1057.89 | 19,085,043 | 1039.81 |
| 1919 | 20,133,048 | 1029.35 | 1,325,439 | 1029.77 | 1,806,046 | 1044.43 | 23,264,533 | 1030.55 |
| 1920 | 29,891,845 | 1038.57 | 2,186,604 | 1038.83 | 2,969,498 | 1043.35 | 35,047,947 | 1039.41 |
| 1921 | 28,927,178 | 1041.72 | 2,096,080 | 1042.31 | 3,481,312 | 1050.18 | 34,504,570 | 1042.61 |
| 1922 | 25,468,663 | 1042.21 | 1,770,175 | 1041.68 | 2,939,893 | 1049.44 | 30,178,731 | 1042.88 |
| 1923 | 22,334,328 | 1042.82 | 1,598,339 | 1041.36 | 15,984 | 1037.5 | 23,948,651 | 1042.72 |
| 1924 | 23,609,228 | 1043.18 | 1,800,687 | 1041.27 | 15,102 | 1037.69 | 25,425,017 | 1043.04 |
| 1925 | 24,827,074 | 1043.24 | 1,895,535 | 1041.53 | 12,216 | 1038.4 | 26,734,825 | 1043.12 |
| 1926 | 24,871,187 | 1043.34 | 1,884,933 | 1041.87 | 9,490 | 1036.91 | 26,765,610 | 1043.23 |
| 1927 | 23,418,640 | 1043.35 | 1,673,576 | 1042.3 | 8,245 | 1038.11 | 25,100,461 | 1043.28 |
| England & N. Ireland | Scotland | United Kingdom | ||||||
| 1924 | 23,624,330 | 1043.17 | 1,800,687 | 1041.27 | 25,425,017 | 1043.04 | ||
| 1925 | 24,839,290 | 1043.24 | 1,895,535 | 1041.53 | 26,734,825 | 1043.12 | ||
| 1926 | 24,880,677 | 1043.34 | 1,884,933 | 1041.87 | 26,765,610 | 1043.23 | ||
| 1927 | 23,426,885 | 1043.35 | 1,673,576 | 1042.30 | 25,100,461 | 1043.28 | ||
| 1928 | 23,610,029 | 1043.34 | 1,749,725 | 1042.95 | 25,359,754 | 1043.31 | ||
| 1929 | 22,803,003 | 1043.20 | 1,727,152 | 1043.47 | 24,530,155 | 1043.21 | ||
| 1930 | 23,180,543 | 1043.01 | 1,803,625 | 1043.55 | 24,984,168 | 1043.05 | ||
| 1931 | 22,129,205 | 1042.68 | 1,651,579 | 1042.84 | 23,780,784 | 1042.69 | ||
| 1932 | 19,277,230 | 1041.14 | 1,398,153 | 1041.86 | 20,675,383 | 1041.19 | ||
| 1933 | 16,639,123 | 1039.59 | 1,204,456 | 1041.07 | 17,843,579 | 1039.69 | ||
| Sources: | ||||||||
| Brewers' Journal 1920, page 345. | ||||||||
| Brewers' Journal 1921, page 246. | ||||||||
| Brewers' Almanack 1928, page 110. | ||||||||
| Brewers' Journal 1934, page 11. | ||||||||
Wondering why beer production fell so much in 1932 and 1933? A disastrous increase in beer tax which caused output to fall so much that, in fact, less tax was collected. There's a lesson there.
I'll be returning to numbers soon. I've neglected them for far too long.
Sunday, 27 November 2011
Edinburgh's chilly climate
Scotland is icy cold. Everyone knows that. And that's why they fermented their beer so cold.
How much colder would you expect the ambient temperature to be in Edinburgh than London? If they fermented 10º F cooler, that seems a reasonable guess. 10º F is about 6º C. The biggest monthly difference is actually 5.5º C.
Here's an easy-to-understand table:
But here's something even more intriguing. The difference in temperature between Edinburgh and Burton:
Not a huge difference, is there? So why didn't they ferment cold in Burton?
How much colder would you expect the ambient temperature to be in Edinburgh than London? If they fermented 10º F cooler, that seems a reasonable guess. 10º F is about 6º C. The biggest monthly difference is actually 5.5º C.
Here's an easy-to-understand table:
| Average temperature by month (º C) | ||||||||||||
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | June | July | Aug | Sept | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
| London | 6.5 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 19.5 | 16.5 | 13.5 | 9.5 | 6.5 |
| Edinburgh | 3.5 | 3.5 | 5 | 6.5 | 9.5 | 12 | 13.5 | 14 | 12 | 8.5 | 6 | 3 |
| difference | -3 | -3.5 | -4 | -4.5 | -4.5 | -5 | -5.5 | -5.5 | -4.5 | -5 | -3.5 | -3.5 |
| Source: | ||||||||||||
| MSN News and Weather | ||||||||||||
But here's something even more intriguing. The difference in temperature between Edinburgh and Burton:
| Average temperature by month (º C) | ||||||||||||
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | June | July | Aug | Sept | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
| Burton | 4 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 8 | 11.5 | 14 | 16.5 | 16.5 | 14 | 11.5 | 6.5 | 5 |
| Edinburgh | 3.5 | 3.5 | 5 | 6.5 | 9.5 | 12 | 13.5 | 14 | 12 | 8.5 | 6 | 3 |
| difference | -0.5 | -1 | -1.5 | -1.5 | -2 | -2 | -3 | -2.5 | -2 | -3 | -0.5 | -2 |
| Source: | ||||||||||||
| MSN News and Weather | ||||||||||||
Not a huge difference, is there? So why didn't they ferment cold in Burton?
Sunday, 3 July 2011
UK beer production 1850 - 1922 : in graphs
Mike made a very good point yesterday. That some of my numbers would work better in graphs.
He's right.
So here are some graphs.
This is the graph of beer production per head of population:

That's better. Much clearer.
He's right.
So here are some graphs.
This is the graph of beer production per head of population:
That's better. Much clearer.
Sunday, 19 June 2011
Beer output by UK region in 1849
Hooray! Today's the last part of my rambling series about the geographical distribution of brewing in 1849.
It's hard to imagine now the dominance of London brewers in the early part of the 19th century. As you can see in the table below, more than a fifth of the UK's beer came from London. More than three times as much beer was brewed in Britain's capital than in Ireland and Scotland combined.
Of course, this is just a snapshot. The situation changes significantly as the century progresses. With other brewing centres such as Burton and Dublin rivalling London in size. When Bass in Burton and Guinness in Dublin went past the 1 million barrel mark, the days of London's supremacy were over. Its went into a long, slow decline that only ended a couple of years ago.
You may have noticed that I've separated out Wales from England. While its beer output lagged a quite bit behind England's relative to population,it was way ahead of Scotland and Ireland. See, I can understand why Ireland would do poorly in such a comparison. It was the least developed part of the UK. But Scotland and Wales had industrialised. Why were their beer industries doing so relatively badly?
The relative contribution of Ireland and Scotland increased during the second half of the 19th century. I'm started to assemble some figures to demonstrate this change. I'll publish them as soon as I've finished, but it may take a while.
It's hard to imagine now the dominance of London brewers in the early part of the 19th century. As you can see in the table below, more than a fifth of the UK's beer came from London. More than three times as much beer was brewed in Britain's capital than in Ireland and Scotland combined.
Of course, this is just a snapshot. The situation changes significantly as the century progresses. With other brewing centres such as Burton and Dublin rivalling London in size. When Bass in Burton and Guinness in Dublin went past the 1 million barrel mark, the days of London's supremacy were over. Its went into a long, slow decline that only ended a couple of years ago.
You may have noticed that I've separated out Wales from England. While its beer output lagged a quite bit behind England's relative to population,it was way ahead of Scotland and Ireland. See, I can understand why Ireland would do poorly in such a comparison. It was the least developed part of the UK. But Scotland and Wales had industrialised. Why were their beer industries doing so relatively badly?
The relative contribution of Ireland and Scotland increased during the second half of the 19th century. I'm started to assemble some figures to demonstrate this change. I'll publish them as soon as I've finished, but it may take a while.
| UK beer output and population, year ending October 1849 | |||||
| output (barrels) | % of output | population in 1851 | % population | barrels per head of population | |
| London | 3,144,954 | 21.50% | 2,362,200 | 8.63% | 1.33 |
| England | 13,223,059 | 90.40% | 16,769,400 | 61.26% | 0.79 |
| Wales | 365,299 | 2.50% | 1,163,000 | 4.25% | 0.31 |
| Scotland | 435,792.5 | 2.98% | 2,889,000 | 10.55% | 0.15 |
| Ireland | 602,437.5 | 4.12% | 6,554,000 | 23.94% | 0.09 |
| total | 14,626,587 | 100.00% | 27,375,400 | 100.00% | 0.53 |
| actual beer output | 14,691,734 | ||||
| Sources: | |||||
| "Statistics of British commerce" by Braithwaite Poole, 1852, pages 5 and 6. | |||||
| http://www.populstat.info/ | |||||
Wednesday, 1 June 2011
Publican brewers
In a recent post about Scottish Twopenny, I mentioned that publican brewers had disappeared much earlier in Scotland than in England. I knew there must be figures somewhere. Today I found them.
Column 6 gives publican brewers. 25,985 in England and Wales, 181 in Scotland, none in Ireland. Pretty conclusive evidence. But it gets even better than that. Because the figures are broken down even further. The picture they paint is even more captivating.
Look at the column for brewing victuallers. The areas with large numbers - over 900 - are all in the Midlands, the North and Wales: Coventry, Derby, Halifax, Lichfield, Manchester, Stourbridge, Leeds, Wales East, Wales South. The Areaes with the fewest - fewer than 100 - are all, except for Liverpool, in the Southeast: Canterbury, Hants, Hartford, Liverpool, Norwich, Reading, Surrey, London, Rochester, Sussex.
Most significant is the area with by far the fewest publican brewers: London with just 1. Brewing was already completely in the hands of commercial brewers and pub brewing as good as extinct.
The pattern is much more complex, with enormous regional variations, than I would have imagined. But I can state this with some confidence: in some regions of Britain pub breweries disappeared in the first half of the 19th century.
| Brewers, Vuctuallers, etc 10th October 1848 to 10th October 1849 totals collected | ||||||||
| number of persons | Number of persons who brew their own beer | |||||||
| licensed to sell beer | licensed to sell beer | |||||||
| Collections | Brewers | Victuallers | To be drunk on the premises | Not to be drunk on the premises | Victuallers | To be drunk on the premises | Not to be drunk on the premises | Bushels of malt consumed by the whole |
| England | 2,257 | 59,335 | 34,800 | 3,270 | 25,985 | 12,201 | 972 | 27,676,714 |
| Scotland | 154 | 15,081 | 181 | 871,586 | ||||
| Ireland | 96 | 14,080 | 1,204,875 | |||||
| total | 2,507 | 88,496 | 34,800 | 3,270 | 26,166 | 12,201 | 972 | 29,753,175 |
| Source: | ||||||||
| "Statistics of British commerce" by Braithwaite Poole, 1852, page 5. | ||||||||
Column 6 gives publican brewers. 25,985 in England and Wales, 181 in Scotland, none in Ireland. Pretty conclusive evidence. But it gets even better than that. Because the figures are broken down even further. The picture they paint is even more captivating.
| Brewers, Vuctuallers, etc 10th October 1848 to 10th October 1849, England | ||||||||
| number of persons | Number of persons who brew their own beer | |||||||
| licensed to sell beer | licensed to sell beer | |||||||
| Collections | Brewers | Victuallers | To be drunk on the premises | Not to be drunk on the premises | Victuallers | To be drunk on the premises | Not to be drunk on the premises | Bushels of malt consumed by the whole |
| Barnstaple | 9 | 595 | 236 | 24 | 547 | 182 | 8 | 158,281 |
| Bath | 43 | 722 | 451 | 139 | 415 | 151 | 29 | 679,127 |
| Bedford | 54 | 1101 | 778 | 78 | 153 | 54 | 10 | 399,513 |
| Bristol | 25 | 666 | 872 | 77 | 453 | 207 | 10 | 461,372 |
| Cambridge | 86 | 1264 | 978 | 132 | 151 | 105 | 33 | 624,064 |
| Canterbury | 53 | 882 | 345 | 55 | 11 | 22 | 5 | 310,169 |
| Chester | 43 | 1037 | 358 | 14 | 592 | 187 | 1 | 221,332 |
| Cornwall | 11 | 747 | 277 | 21 | 505 | 128 | 3 | 154,368 |
| Coventry | 23 | 1497 | 519 | 65 | 1334 | 398 | 31 | 542,648 |
| Cumberland | 24 | 1352 | 235 | 29 | 128 | 27 | 25 | 195,148 |
| Derby | 20 | 1166 | 516 | 31 | 1139 | 454 | 12 | 564,541 |
| Dorset | 53 | 511 | 477 | 125 | 213 | 76 | 35 | 259,871 |
| Durham | 91 | 2068 | 304 | 38 | 404 | 34 | 247,514 | |
| Essex | 50 | 738 | 459 | 147 | 158 | 108 | 63 | 286,576 |
| Exeter | 25 | 737 | 203 | 23 | 529 | 63 | 3 | 240,101 |
| Gloucester | 28 | 774 | 701 | 82 | 555 | 420 | 34 | 345,719 |
| Grantham | 55 | 1104 | 656 | 57 | 603 | 186 | 16 | 385,106 |
| Halifax | 57 | 1334 | 1258 | 42 | 914 | 872 | 37 | 488,975 |
| Hants | 63 | 725 | 700 | 126 | 98 | 168 | 41 | 433,576 |
| Hereford | 4 | 756 | 294 | 11 | 701 | 265 | 6 | 113,781 |
| Hartford | 47 | 1020 | 840 | 53 | 40 | 32 | 16 | 554,992 |
| Hull | 74 | 1114 | 227 | 36 | 154 | 10 | 1 | 208,463 |
| Isle of Wight | 61 | 769 | 637 | 96 | 103 | 157 | 37 | 463,658 |
| Lancaster | 29 | 1109 | 865 | 21 | 760 | 286 | 1 | 507,852 |
| Leeds | 25 | 1015 | 848 | 52 | 900 | 570 | 39 | 615,724 |
| Lichfield | 11 | 1030 | 1008 | 35 | 1001 | 849 | 16 | 305,345 |
| Lincoln | 49 | 915 | 367 | 60 | 604 | 110 | 13 | 306,665 |
| Liverpool | 77 | 1551 | 1205 | 22 | 19 | 14 | 1 | 763,123 |
| London | 79 | 4223 | 2054 | 65 | 1 | 50 | 8 | 6,289,908 |
| Lynn | 70 | 1156 | 866 | 80 | 102 | 70 | 15 | 640,092 |
| Manchester | 96 | 1706 | 3102 | 157 | 971 | 1074 | 54 | 979,907 |
| Newcastle | 84 | 1949 | 280 | 29 | 145 | 5 | 3 | 404,183 |
| Northampton | 24 | 1038 | 381 | 122 | 761 | 175 | 37 | 325,441 |
| Northwich | 30 | 1197 | 706 | 16 | 668 | 149 | 1 | 392,040 |
| Norwich | 49 | 1441 | 329 | 76 | 87 | 33 | 22 | 372,053 |
| Oxford | 29 | 891 | 393 | 99 | 421 | 121 | 33 | 337,695 |
| Plymouth | 40 | 948 | 476 | 56 | 431 | 42 | 6 | 345,250 |
| Reading | 41 | 888 | 760 | 115 | 51 | 54 | 21 | 496,466 |
| Rochester | 77 | 1191 | 849 | 74 | 14 | 20 | 6 | 443,088 |
| Salisbury | 28 | 577 | 264 | 101 | 351 | 117 | 44 | 297,956 |
| Salop | 3 | 600 | 376 | 15 | 569 | 331 | 4 | 266,350 |
| Sheffield | 32 | 1428 | 584 | 84 | 726 | 152 | 10 | 492,019 |
| Stafford | 30 | 772 | 782 | 6 | 733 | 592 | 1 | 638,268 |
| Stourbridge | 7 | 1383 | 1460 | 62 | 1328 | 1385 | 34 | 799,499 |
| Suffolk | 52 | 728 | 409 | 111 | 259 | 170 | 66 | 328,776 |
| Surrey | 83 | 1108 | 977 | 91 | 7 | 48 | 21 | 846,841 |
| Sussex | 71 | 829 | 693 | 90 | 66 | 80 | 29 | 465,762 |
| Wales, East | 40 | 1781 | 1523 | 19 | 1537 | 882 | 1 | 375,006 |
| Wales, Middle | 1 | 724 | 104 | 1 | 657 | 94 | 91,150 | |
| Wales, North | 30 | 1139 | 162 | 7 | 627 | 23 | 151,606 | |
| Wales, South | 8 | 1293 | 45 | 4 | 1296 | 26 | 112,835 | |
| Worcester | 5 | 531 | 366 | 53 | 501 | 309 | 23 | 205,813 |
| York | 58 | 1515 | 245 | 46 | 492 | 64 | 7 | 241,106 |
| total | 2,257 | 59,335 | 34,800 | 3,270 | 25,985 | 12,201 | 972 | 27,176,714 |
| total (given in source) | 2,257 | 59,335 | 34,800 | 3,270 | 25,985 | 12,201 | 972 | 27,676,714 |
| Source: | ||||||||
| "Statistics of British commerce" by Braithwaite Poole, 1852, page 4. | ||||||||
Look at the column for brewing victuallers. The areas with large numbers - over 900 - are all in the Midlands, the North and Wales: Coventry, Derby, Halifax, Lichfield, Manchester, Stourbridge, Leeds, Wales East, Wales South. The Areaes with the fewest - fewer than 100 - are all, except for Liverpool, in the Southeast: Canterbury, Hants, Hartford, Liverpool, Norwich, Reading, Surrey, London, Rochester, Sussex.
Most significant is the area with by far the fewest publican brewers: London with just 1. Brewing was already completely in the hands of commercial brewers and pub brewing as good as extinct.
The pattern is much more complex, with enormous regional variations, than I would have imagined. But I can state this with some confidence: in some regions of Britain pub breweries disappeared in the first half of the 19th century.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









