The recipes are also surprisingly different. There’s far more base malt in the Stout, 65% as opposed to just 43%. There’s about half as much of the two coloured malts, around 9% of the grist in total. Which leaves the Stout a bit paler than the Porter. The opposite of what I would have expected.
Fewer oats are also present. Again, around half of what’s in the Porter. It implies that Fremlin marketed two strengths of Oatmeal Stout. One based on the Porter and one on the Double Stout.
There’s less of the cane sugar, but it still makes up almost 20% of the grist. That’s an awful lot still. Especially for a Stout, which would be expected to be quite full-bodied.
A slightly higher hopping rate was employed than in the Porter, 7.5 lbs per quarter (336 lbs) of malt, compared to 6.5 lbs. That, combined with the higher gravity, leaves the bitterness level of the finished beer quite a bit higher at 71 IBU.
Was this beer aged? I’ve no real idea. There’s no indication in the brewing record. I don’t think it was vatted. Maybe a couple of months in trade casks.
| 1897 Fremlin Double Stout | ||
| pale malt | 9.75 lb | 66.87% |
| brown malt | 0.75 lb | 5.14% |
| chocolate malt | 0.50 lb | 3.43% |
| oat malt | 0.50 lb | 3.43% |
| brown sugar | 2.75 lb | 18.86% |
| caramel 1000 SRM | 0.33 lb | 2.26% |
| Fuggles 120 mins | 2.00 oz | |
| Fuggles 60 mins | 2.00 oz | |
| Goldings 30 mins | 2.00 oz | |
| OG | 1072 | |
| FG | 1017.5 | |
| ABV | 7.21 | |
| Apparent attenuation | 75.69% | |
| IBU | 71 | |
| SRM | 38 | |
| Mash at | 154º F | |
| Sparge at | 175º F | |
| Boil time | 120 minutes | |
| pitching temp | 58º F | |
| Yeast | Wyeast 1099 Whitbread Ale | |












