Tuesday 1 August 2023

London Stout between the wars

WW I might have put the boot into Porter, but Stout was still alive and kicking in London. Looking at Whitbread\s production figures, it looks as if some Porter drinkers switched to Stout. It would make sense, as post-war Stout was very similar to pre-war Porter.

Whitbread brewed considerable quantities of Stout between the wars. However, the long-term tendency was of decline.

Over the interwar period, the proportion of Whitbread’s output that was Porter and Stout fell from 35% to 22%. A worrying trend and a sign of what would come after WW II.

This is the time when a couple of Stout variants became incredibly popular: Oatmeal Stout and Milk Stout. Both sort-of exclusively in bottled form.

Oatmeal Stout had been around since the 1890s and was already pretty popular in the runup to WW I. While the original versions, such as Maclay’s, had a hefty quantity of oats, later imitators used ridiculously small amounts. And, as they were often parti-gyled with other Stouts, a company’s draught Stout might also contain unannounced oats.

Milk Stout was developed by Mackeson in 1911. They claimed to want to create a more nourishing form of Stout by adding lactose. They made much play of this on their labels and advertising. It was a big hit. Too big a hit for a small brewer like Mackeson.

Originally, they allowed other brewers to produce Milk Stout under licence. This system broke down after a while when breweries brewed versions without bothering to get a licence. In the 1930s, Mackeson came under the control of Whitbread. Who started brewing their Milk Stout at Chiswell Street in 1936.

The odd strong Stout continued to brewed, mostly for export. Though a few specialities, such as Barclay’s Imperial Russian Stout, continued to be brewed at pre-war strength.

Another big development was the opening of Guinness’s Park Royal brewery in London. Bringing together the two great Stout brewing traditions. Not that Guinness picked up anything from local practices. They brewed exactly the same way as they did in Dublin.

Whitbread Porter and Stout output 1921 - 1939
  P S CS LS ES MS SSS Total Porter & Stout Total Ale & Porter % Porter & Stout
1921 15,688 58,452   133,563 30,920     238,623 675,647 35.32%
1922 16,562 47,530 84,703 15,340 28,582     192,717 576,118 33.45%
1923 14,165 39,960 68,326 20,866 26,660     169,977 505,097 33.65%
1924 15,948 37,834 74,258 23,442 26,710     178,192 551,616 32.30%
1925 14,943 35,396 62,357 22,262 28,974     163,932 527,977 31.05%
1926 13,511 34,567 20,721 69,724 29,990     168,513 512,528 32.88%
1927 10,708 30,087   86,569 22,361     149,725 462,250 32.39%
1928 10,105 30,017   85,992 16,039     142,153 488,357 29.11%
1929 5,558 17,284   51,624 11,313     85,779 443,888 19.32%
1930 13,840 25,643   90,801 20,724     151,008 535,271 28.21%
1931 13,389 17,109   93,094 20,027     143,619 495,805 28.97%
1932 10,493     100,632 15,342     126,467 442,755 28.56%
1933 9,653     97,810 13,973     121,436 471,190 25.77%
1934 9,444     91,660 21,116     122,220 501,180 24.39%
1935 8,006     89,617 25,646     123,269 528,370 23.33%
1936 6,836     85,748 16,868 14,428   123,880 540,995 22.90%
1937 5,939     82,900 10,805 27,730   127,374 565,230 22.53%
1938 5,133     75,651 10,022 36,769   127,575 569,532 22.40%
1939 3,810     67,177 6,037 50,890 928 128,842 590,695 21.81%
Sources:
Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numbers LMA/4453/D/09/114 to LMA/4453/D/09/126 and LMA/4453/D/01/086 to LMA/4453/D/01/107.

This is an excerpt from my new book on London Stout. Get your copy now!




 

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I read this quote about 1850's and 1860's London, written in 1924...'At any of these resorts compounds unknown to the modern bar-maid might be called for. Such as porter, a thin black fluid suggestive of liberally-watered stout, and "cooper," a half-and-half mixture of porter and four-penny ale - which was a "small beer" costing 4d. per quart, this being likewise the market price of porter.'. Two things struck me - porter was 'unknown' to the 1920's London barmaid, and porter being like liberally watered-down stout. Does that fit with something you said on Martyn Cornell's page about porter being a bit like mild? When I used to drink (dark) mild in the late (19)80's, I used to call it poor man's Guinness as it was very dark, a bit ruby coloured under light, and something of the taste of Guinness.

Anonymous said...

Source for the 1924 quote - https://www.victorianlondon.org/publications5/londoners-10.htm

Anonymous said...

Interesting Ron thankfully modern oatmeal stouts tend to have a good quantity of oats in them.
Oscar

Anonymous said...

Mild has nothing to do with porter.
Oscar