Let's start with the Bitters:
Whitbread 1950 PA mashing scheme | |||||||
qtrs malt | barrels water | barrels per qtr | Strike heat | mashed (mins) | time stood (mins) | Tap heat | |
mash | 98 | 220 | 2.24 | 150º | 15 | 30 | |
underlet | 32 | 0.33 | 180º | 90 | 144º | ||
sparge | 260 | 165º | |||||
sparge | 174 | 160º | 150º | ||||
Source: | |||||||
Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives |
Lees 1950 Bitter mashing scheme | |||||||
qtrs malt | barrels water | barrels per qtr | Strike heat | mash heat | time stood (mins) | Tap heat | |
mash | 15.5 | 37 | 2.39 | 155º | 148º | 20 | |
underlet | 4 | 0.26 | 170º | 150º | 100 | 150º | |
sparge | 170º | ||||||
sparge | 160º | ||||||
Source: | |||||||
JW Lees brewing records |
Now the Milds:
Whitbread 1950 Best Ale mashing scheme | |||||||
qtrs malt | barrels water | barrels per qtr | Strike heat | mashed (mins) | time stood (mins) | Tap heat | |
mash | 90 | 202 | 2.24 | 150º | 10 | 30 | |
underlet | 30 | 0.33 | 180º | 90 | 146º | ||
sparge | 210 | 168º | |||||
sparge | 233 | 160-165º | 153º | ||||
Source: | |||||||
Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives |
Lees 1950 K mashing scheme | |||||||
qtrs malt | barrels water | barrels per qtr | Strike heat | mash heat | time stood (mins) | Tap heat | |
mash | 12.375 | 29 | 2.34 | 155º | 148º | ||
underlet | 4 | 0.32 | 170º | 150º | 120 | 150º | |
sparge | 170º | ||||||
sparge | 160º | ||||||
Source: | |||||||
JW Lees brewing records |
What does that tell us? That Lees mashed at a slightly higher temperature than Whitbread. And sparged with very slightly hotter water. The water to grain ratio of the mash is very similar: 2.35 for Lees, 2.24 for Whitbread. The amount underlet is identical: a third of a barrel per quarter of malt. The standing time was the same at 2 hours.
Both breweries mashed their Bitter and their Mild exactly the same way. Which was pretty normal. Breweries didn't usually mess around with a different mashing scheme for each individual beer. I don't blame them. Especially in the days before computer control.
Fun, fun, fun. We'll be having it all summer long. Perhaps not always quite as much as today.
4 comments:
Any difference in their water treatment, or does that excitement come later, you tease …
Martyn, yes. Just keep reading. Loads of big fat juicy close up water treatments to come.
Just joking. Lees logs have no water treatment details, I'm afraid.
Manchester water was (is) very soft. I used to add the Burton's salts from the HBS when brewing bitter but for mild it was straight from the tap.
Lee's probably didn't log water treatment because they didn't treat it.
"Both breweries mashed their Bitter and their Mild exactly the same way. Which was pretty normal"
I wonder does this quash the idea that is circulated that mild's where mashed hotter to provide dextrans to refresh factory workers?
Post a Comment