Saturday, 7 December 2024

Let's Brew - 1906 Drybrough X Stout

Drybrough’s records from this period are a nightmare. There’s some weird gyling and blending going on. The only brews I can make any sense of are some Pale Ale parti-gyles and a couple of X Ale parti-gyles.

I’ll be honest, I’m not sure that there wasn’t some sort of blending going on here. I’m just assuming the three gyles were left as fermented.

Usually, I’d assume X meant Mild. Not sure that’s the case here. For a start, the hopping rate is higher than for the Pale Ales. 7.5 lbs per quarter (336 lbs) of malt compared to just 5 lbs. Then I noticed the No. 4 invert and black malt. These are clearly Stouts.

The first thing that strikes me is how weak this beer is. Weaker even than Table Beer.  Not really “stout” at all.

It’s a pretty complicated recipe. Especially in the sugars. Where there are three inverts, caramel and hone.  The latter is an unusual one. You see it in recipes for domestic brewers, but not for commercial brewers.

There were four types of hops. Three English, two from the 1905 harvest and one from 1903. The fourth type was Californian from 1906.
 

1906 Drybrough X
pale malt 4.25 lb 66.88%
black malt 0.15 lb 2.36%
flaked rice 0.50 lb 7.87%
flaked maize 0.33 lb 5.19%
No. 1 invert sugar 0.1875 lb 2.95%
No. 2 invert sugar 0.25 lb 3.93%
No. 4 invert sugar 0.1875 lb 2.95%
honey 0.25 lb 3.93%
caramel 500 SRM 0.25 lb 3.93%
Fuggles 120 mins 0.25 oz
Cluster 120 mins 0.50 oz
Fuggles 90 mins 0.75 oz
Goldings 30 mins 0.75 oz
OG 1030
FG 1011
ABV 2.51
Apparent attenuation 63.33%
IBU 37
SRM 19
Mash at 148º F
Sparge at 167º F
Boil time 120 minutes
pitching temp 61º F
Yeast WLP028 Edinburgh Ale

 

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

It seems ridiculously pale for a stout/porter.
Oscar

Anonymous said...

Oscar, It was a drink of the poor. Blacker stout was held in reservation for the Edwardian aristocracy. Also, thank you for your valuable insights on nearly every post.