After disappearing, I think, in April 1917, Kidd Stout made a sudden comeback in May 1918. Presumably at the same time as the Porter disappeared.
Which makes it look more like a renaming exercise than a true revival. The strength certainly isn’t very Stout-like. Though it is 2 points higher than the last iteration of Porter.
The grist is much the same as that Porter’s. Save for dropping the cane sugar and doubling the No. 2 invert sugar at the expense of the base malt. It remains a complex malt bill, with a reasonable amount of roast. As usual, the No. 2 invert is my substitute for something simply listed as “Budgett”.
The hops were pretty old: all Kent from 1915. Obviously, I’ve slashed the hopping rate in the recipe to allow for that.
1918 Kidd Stout | ||
pale malt | 5.00 lb | 63.94% |
brown malt | 0.33 lb | 4.22% |
black malt | 0.33 lb | 4.22% |
crystal malt 60 L | 0.33 lb | 4.22% |
No. 2 invert sugar | 1.33 lb | 17.01% |
caramel 2000 SRM | 0.50 lb | 6.39% |
Fuggles 120 mins | 1.25 oz | |
Fuggles 60 mins | 1.25 oz | |
OG | 1035 | |
FG | 1010 | |
ABV | 3.31 | |
Apparent attenuation | 71.43% | |
IBU | 36 | |
SRM | 37 | |
Mash at | 153º F | |
Sparge at | 165º F | |
Boil time | 120 minutes | |
pitching temp | 59º F | |
Yeast | Wyeast 1099 Whitbread Ale |
You can find lots of other recipe,s along with literally hundreds of others, in my book on post-WW II British brewing:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback-book/austerity/23181344
1 comment:
I started to think, whilst scrolling down, that it looked an interesting recipe. Until, that is, I saw that a wee baby of a beer had almost 20% sugar. True to the watery tradition.
Post a Comment