As with the Pale Ales, I sort of made up my own styles for this purpose. Or at least classes. They aren’t very complicated. I’ve used two criteria: gravity and attenuation. This what I’ve come up with:
Type | OG | Apparent attenuation |
Strong Stout | >1050 | >65% |
Strong Stout | >1050 | <50% |
Standard Stout | 1040 - 1050 | >70% |
Standard Stout | 1040 - 1050 | 65 - 70% |
Standard Stout | 1040 - 1050 | 60 - 65% |
Standard Stout | 1040 - 1050 | 50 - 60% |
Standard Stout | 1040 - 1050 | <50% |
Weak Stout | 1030 - 1040 | >70% |
Weak Stout | 1030 - 1040 | 65 - 70% |
Weak Stout | 1030 - 1040 | 60 - 65% |
Weak Stout | 1030 - 1040 | 50 - 60% |
Weak Stout | 1030 - 1040 | <50% |
Why am I using attenuation as well as OG? Because there’s so much variation in the degree of attenuation. Way more than with other styles. The lowest is 33% the highest 95%. I think it’s pretty obvious that beers with such differing attenuation have little in common.
Obviously, my dividing lines are totally arbitrary. But I’ve a decent number of examples in each of my categories. Why did I split 60-70% into two categories? For no real reason. I feel justified by the fact that for both standard and weak Stout unsplit this level of attenuation would have been by a long way the largest group.
These are the numbers of each type:
Type | OG | Apparent attenuation | no. examples | % of total |
Strong Stout | >1050 | >65% | 19 | 4.17% |
Strong Stout | >1050 | <50% | 11 | 2.41% |
Standard Stout | 1040 - 1050 | >70% | 62 | 14.04% |
Standard Stout | 1040 - 1050 | 65 - 70% | 47 | 10.31% |
Standard Stout | 1040 - 1050 | 60 - 65% | 48 | 10.53% |
Standard Stout | 1040 - 1050 | 50 - 60% | 64 | 14.04% |
Standard Stout | 1040 - 1050 | <50% | 13 | 2.85% |
Weak Stout | 1030 - 1040 | >70% | 43 | 9.43% |
Weak Stout | 1030 - 1040 | 65 - 70% | 42 | 9.21% |
Weak Stout | 1030 - 1040 | 60 - 65% | 36 | 7.89% |
Weak Stout | 1030 - 1040 | 50 - 60% | 57 | 12.50% |
Weak Stout | 1030 - 1040 | <50% | 12 | 2.63% |
total | 456 | 100.00% |
What’s the point of all this? To demonstrate again that not all English Stout was sweet. The fact that for both standard and weak Stout there are about as many examples with attenuation above 65% as there are below 65% vindicates my assertion.
But I’ll be making that point at much greater length in what follows.
4 comments:
"Weak stout" - a classic oxymoron, really, like "dwarf giant". Just to show that nature abhors a vacuum, and when the category "porter" disappared, it was filld with the category "low-gravity stout".
Another good one is black IPA. I sleep better at night for not getting worried about hings like this.
I'm confused. You have the same gravity range for weak stout as for standard stout. Should it be 1030-1040?
Jeff,
good point. Fixed.
Post a Comment