Which was, along with Porter, their original specialisation. This time I've split it into two parts, one for draught versions the other for bottled. You'll see why that makes so much sense when you've looked at the tables.
I'll start with the three examples from 1870. They come courtesy of the British Medical Journal. I can make a decent stab at what they were sold as. In ascending order of strength: Stout, Double Stout and Treble (or Imperial) Stout. Don't believe me? Well here are Truman's equivalents from the very same year:
Stout | 1070.1 |
Double Stout | 1079.5 |
Imperial | 1083.7 |
Source: | |
Truman brewing record held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number B/THB/C/072. |
It's very strange what happens in the 1930's. At the beginning of the 1920's, it's very much what you would expect: 9d a pint and a gravity in the mid-1050's. (If you're wondering, Guinness Extra Stout was 1055 in the 1920's.) Then after 1923 the price drops to 8d a pint. Now I understand why the gravity would drop in 1931: Snowden's emergency budget that raised beer duty from 80 shillings a standard barrel to 114 shillings.
Hoare draught Stout 1870 - 1933 | ||||||||
Year | Beer | Price | size | Acidity | FG | OG | ABV | App. Atten-uation |
1870 | Stout | 0.23 | 1025.9 | 1090.9 | 8.29 | 71.49% | ||
1870 | Stout | 0.20 | 1014 | 1068.1 | 6.96 | 79.43% | ||
1870 | Stout | 3.5d | pint | 0.22 | 1014.5 | 1078.4 | 7.81 | 81.50% |
1921 | Stout | 9d | pint | 1023.2 | 1054 | 3.97 | 57.04% | |
1922 | Stout | 9d | pint | 1020.8 | 1056.8 | 4.65 | 63.38% | |
1922 | Stout | 9d | pint | 1018.7 | 1054.2 | 4.59 | 65.50% | |
1923 | Stout | 9d | pint | 1020.4 | 1055.4 | 4.52 | 63.18% | |
1923 | Stout | 8d | pint | 1017.4 | 1054.4 | 4.79 | 68.01% | |
1923 | Stout | 8d | pint | 1017.5 | 1050.5 | 4.27 | 65.35% | |
1925 | Stout | 8d | pint | 1013.2 | 1052.7 | 5.13 | 74.95% | |
1928 | Stout | 7d | pint | 1013.6 | 1046.6 | 4.28 | 70.82% | |
1928 | Stout | 7d | pint | 1012.6 | 1053 | 5.26 | 76.24% | |
1929 | Stout | 8d | pint | 0.12 | 1010.9 | 1052.1 | 5.37 | 79.08% |
1929 | Stout | 8d | pint | 0.09 | 1018 | 1056.2 | 4.95 | 67.97% |
1930 | Stout | 8d | pint | 1022.6 | 1055 | 4.18 | 58.91% | |
1930 | Stout | 8d | pint | 0.08 | 1013.9 | 1053 | 5.08 | 73.77% |
1930 | Stout | 8d | pint | 1019.2 | 1047 | 3.58 | 59.15% | |
1930 | Stout | 8d | pint | 1015.2 | 1050 | 4.51 | 69.60% | |
1930 | Stout | 7d | pint | 1048.2 | ||||
1931 | Stout | 8d | pint | 0.06 | 1016.5 | 1044.8 | 3.66 | 63.17% |
1931 | Stout | 8d | pint | 0.14 | 1012.6 | 1054.2 | 5.41 | 76.75% |
1931 | Stout | 8d | pint | 1015.2 | 1041 | 3.33 | 62.93% | |
1931 | Stout | 8d | pint | 1038.3 | ||||
1932 | Stout | 8d | pint | 0.07 | 1015 | 1041 | 3.36 | 63.41% |
1932 | Stout | 8d | pint | 0.06 | 1012 | 1042 | 3.89 | 71.43% |
1932 | Stout | 8d | pint | 1039.1 | ||||
1932 | Stout | 8d | pint | 1042.4 | ||||
1933 | Stout | 8d | pint | 0.11 | 1013.8 | 1042.2 | 3.67 | 67.30% |
Sources: | ||||||||
British Medical Journal June 25th 1870, page 658. | ||||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001 | ||||||||
Truman Gravity Book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number B/THB/C/252 |
The gravity of Stout prior to the budget makes working its effect a piece of piss. Because averaging around 1055, it was standard gravity (a standard barrel was 36 gallons of beer with an OG of 1055). Which means the tax on a barrel of Stout increased by 34 shillings. Or 11.33d per gallon. That's near as dammit 1.5d per pint.
What most breweries in London did was to cut the gravity of their draught Stout to 1047 and increase the price from 8d to 9d. Here are some examples:
London draught Stouts | |||||
Date | Brewer | Beer | Price | size | OG |
1931 | Barclay Perkins | Stout | 9d | pint | 1050.9 |
1931 | Barclay Perkins | Stout | 9d | pint | 1049.6 |
1931 | Charrington | Stout | 9d | pint | 1049.3 |
1931 | Charrington | Stout | 9d | pint | 1043 |
1931 | Courage | Stout | 8d | pint | 1047.6 |
1931 | Courage | Stout | 8d | pint | 1046.9 |
1931 | Mann Crossman | Stout | 9d | pint | 1046.3 |
1931 | Mann Crossman | Stout | 9d | pint | 1046.8 |
1931 | Taylor Walker | Stout | 8d | pint | 1049.5 |
1931 | Taylor Walker | Stout | 9d | pint | 1046.9 |
1931 | Truman | Stout | 8d | pint | 1044.3 |
1931 | Truman | Stout | 8d | pint | 1048.8 |
1931 | Watney | Stout | 8d | pint | 1047.8 |
1931 | Watney | Stout | 8d | pint | 1043.3 |
1931 | Wenlock | Stout | 8d | pint | 1046.7 |
1931 | Wenlock | Stout | 8d | pint | 1045.6 |
1931 | Whitbread | LS | 8d | pint | 1045.3 |
Average | 1047 | ||||
Sources: | |||||
Truman Gravity Book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number B/THB/C/252 | |||||
Whitbread brewing record held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numberLMA/4453/D/09/124 |
That gravity cut and price increase makes sense when you look at the tax paid: per bulk barrel at the rate of 114 shillings per barrel:
OG | tax per barrel (shillings) |
1041 | 85.0 |
1039 | 80.8 |
1047 | 97.4 |
At 1047, about 17.5 shillings more tax was due, which is about 6d per gallon or 0.75d per pint.
The table tells you what Hoare did: they dropped the gravity so much that the tax die was about the same as before the budget, namely 80 shillings per barrel. I guess most breweries thought that was just too drastic. I agree with them. A gravity of 1040-ish is just too low for a Stout.
No comments:
Post a Comment