I twigged what that secret was when I got to about 1951 in my log trawl. It's made me do some rethinking about Scottish beer. Particularly about the nature of 60/-, 70/- and 80/-. But before we get onto such philosophical questions, let's take a look at the beer itself:
Maclay PA 6d 1939 - 1992 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date | Year | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl | Pitch temp | max. fermen-tation temp | length of fermen-tation (days) | pale malt | crystal malt | no. 1 sugar | no. 2 sugar | caramel | DCS sugar | oats | flaked maize | flaked rice | wheat malt | flaked barley | malted oats | torrefied wheat | malt extract |
21st Feb | 1939 | 1038 | 1017 | 2.78 | 55.26% | 4.00 | 0.65 | 60º | 67.5º | 8 | 78.57% | 14.29% | 7.14% | |||||||||||
15th Aug | 1939 | 1038 | 1011 | 3.57 | 71.05% | 6.00 | 1.00 | 59º | 68º | 9 | 75.00% | 16.67% | 8.33% | |||||||||||
6th Feb | 1940 | 1036 | 1014 | 2.91 | 61.11% | 5.00 | 0.78 | 60º | 66º | 8 | 85.71% | 14.29% | ||||||||||||
29th Jun | 1943 | 1032 | 1014 | 2.38 | 56.25% | 4.00 | 0.56 | 60º | 67.5º | 7 | 76.98% | 9.06% | 0.38% | 4.53% | 9.06% | |||||||||
6th Jul | 1943 | 1032 | 1011 | 2.78 | 65.63% | 4.00 | 0.55 | 60º | 65º | 8 | 76.34% | 8.14% | 0.25% | 6.11% | 9.16% | |||||||||
6th Jul | 1943 | 1032 | 1011 | 2.78 | 65.63% | 4.00 | 0.55 | 60º | 65º | 8 | 76.34% | 8.14% | 0.25% | 6.11% | 9.16% | |||||||||
4th Aug | 1943 | 1032 | 1014 | 2.38 | 56.25% | 4.00 | 0.55 | 60º | 67º | 6 | 76.98% | 9.06% | 0.38% | 4.53% | 9.06% | |||||||||
10th Mar | 1944 | 1032 | 1011 | 2.78 | 65.63% | 3.53 | 0.48 | 60º | 67º | 8 | 79.39% | 8.14% | 0.25% | 6.11% | 6.11% | |||||||||
13th Jun | 1944 | 1032 | 1014 | 2.38 | 56.25% | 4.00 | 0.57 | 60º | 68º | 7 | 79.39% | 8.14% | 0.25% | 12.21% | ||||||||||
21st Jun | 1951 | 1030 | 1013 | 2.25 | 56.67% | 5.26 | 0.70 | 61.5º | 66º | 7 | 94.12% | 5.88% | 0.00% | |||||||||||
25th Jul | 1951 | 1030 | 1010 | 2.65 | 66.67% | 5.25 | 0.65 | 61º | 68º | 8 | 87.26% | 5.13% | 0.76% | 1.71% | 5.13% | |||||||||
20th May | 1952 | 1030 | 1012 | 2.38 | 60.00% | 5.33 | 0.67 | 61º | 68º | 8 | 86.80% | 5.79% | 0.18% | 2.89% | 4.34% | |||||||||
24th Jul | 1952 | 1030 | 1009 | 2.78 | 70.00% | 5.33 | 0.68 | 61º | 69º | 8 | 86.80% | 5.79% | 0.18% | 2.89% | 4.34% | |||||||||
5th Sep | 1956 | 1030 | 1010 | 2.65 | 66.67% | 6.00 | 0.77 | 62º | 70.5º | 8 | 74.82% | 7.67% | 0.24% | 3.84% | 11.51% | 1.92% | ||||||||
10th May | 1957 | 1030 | 1013 | 2.25 | 56.67% | 5.62 | 0.69 | 62.5º | 68º | 7 | 74.82% | 7.67% | 0.24% | 3.84% | 11.51% | 1.92% | ||||||||
29th Jul | 1957 | 1030 | 1009 | 2.78 | 70.00% | 6.32 | 0.81 | 62º | 72º | 8 | 73.24% | 9.39% | 0.47% | 3.76% | 11.27% | 1.88% | ||||||||
1st Sep | 1965 | 1030 | 1012 | 2.38 | 60.00% | 6.05 | 0.75 | 61.5º | 69.5º | 7 | 74.82% | 7.67% | 0.24% | 3.84% | 11.51% | 1.92% | ||||||||
9th Mar | 1966 | 1030 | 1012 | 2.38 | 60.00% | 6.05 | 0.74 | 61.5º | 69º | 7 | 74.91% | 7.68% | 0.12% | 3.84% | 11.52% | 1.92% | ||||||||
7th Jan | 1971 | 1030 | 1008 | 2.91 | 73.33% | 5.08 | 0.64 | 62º | 71º | 7 | 79.18% | 5.66% | 0.08% | 1.89% | 11.31% | 1.89% | ||||||||
27th Jun | 1971 | 1030 | 1011 | 2.51 | 63.33% | 4.86 | 0.61 | 61.5º | 69.5º | 7 | 79.06% | 3.76% | 0.24% | 3.76% | 11.29% | 1.88% | ||||||||
19th Apr | 1972 | 1030 | 1009 | 2.78 | 70.00% | 5.19 | 0.64 | 62.5º | 72º | 7 | 79.15% | 5.65% | 0.12% | 1.88% | 11.31% | 1.88% | ||||||||
2nd Apr | 1975 | 1030 | 1008 | 2.91 | 73.33% | 5.30 | 0.67 | 61.5º | 70º | 7 | 79.15% | 5.65% | 0.12% | 1.88% | 11.31% | 1.88% | ||||||||
6th Mar | 1980 | 1030 | 1008 | 2.91 | 73.33% | 5.30 | 0.65 | 61º | 69º | 7 | 79.06% | 5.65% | 0.24% | 1.88% | 11.29% | 1.88% | ||||||||
18th Mar | 1984 | 1030 | 1007 | 3.04 | 76.67% | 5.30 | 0.65 | 61º | 66º | 8 | 90.35% | 5.65% | 0.24% | 1.88% | 1.88% | |||||||||
8th Jul | 1992 | 1034 | 1011 | 3.04 | 67.65% | 4.17 | 0.62 | º | 70º | 7 | 87.18% | 5.13% | 2.56% | 5.13% | 0.00% | |||||||||
Sources: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maclay brewing records, document numbers M/6/1/1/3, M/6/1/1/4, M/6/1/1/13, M/6/1/1/28, M/6/1/1/35, M/6/1/1/44, M/6/1/1/46, M/6/1/1/49, M/6/1/1/56, M/6/1/1/61, M/6/1/1/64 held at the Scottish Brewing Archive. |
The first thing that strikes me is how little this beer changed between 1951 and 1984. The OG was rock solid at 1030, though the FG did decline a point or two. I don't think I've come across a beer whose specs were so stable for so long.
The stability doesn't end there. The hopping rate stayed at around 0.65 lbs per barrel for the whole period. As did the fermentation temperature, with pitching at 61º F, rising to 69º F. Fermentation took 7 or 8 days.
I'm shocked at how little the recipe changed as well. 75-80% pale malt, 5-7% No. 2 invert, 3% DCS sugar, 11% flaked maize, 2% malt extract and a touch of caramel. Between 1956 and 1980 the recipe is basically identical. That's very unusual.
That's quite odd, but not as odd as what comes next.
Matching up brewhouse names with product names can be a nightmare. Especially when you don't have a price list. That's not a problem with Maclay. At least not from the 1970's onwards, because I can remember their beers and they're listed in the Good Beer Guide.
This is the entry for Maclay in the 1982 Good Beer Guide:
I can match these up nae probs with the beers in the brewing records. There's only one thing 60/- could possibly be: PA 6d. Which causes me quite a degree of consternation.
Because I always considered 60/-, and Maclay 60/- in particular, to be Dark Mild. Not only was it called a Pale Ale in the brewery, it was brewed to exactly the same recipe as the 70/- (SPA in the brewhouse) and 80/- (Export). Presumably it was primed with caramel at racking time to get the dark colour.
This in itself isn't that unusual. There were plenty of breweries who made Mild by adding caramel to their Bitter. It still goes on today. What makes me feel weird is this: in way, the BJCP are right in their description of 60/-, 70/- and 80/-. They say that they are different strength versions of the same thing. Which in the case of Maclay is certainly true. Where the BJCP falls down is in not recognising that they are the Scottish versions of Pale Ale rather than mythical "Scottish Ales". And all that bollocks about cool fermentation temperatures, roast barley for colouring, etc.
There's one question unanswered: when did Maclay PA 6d get darker and turn into a pretend Mild?
7 comments:
Fascinating. What you want, if it's available, is the purchasing ledger, which would show when they started purchasing quantities of caramel. Another possibility for clues: when did they start making a brown ale, and what was the recipe for that? I wouldn't be totally surprised to discover that, too, was the PA coloured up ...
Anonymous, don't know when they started brewing Brown Ale, but I've seen labels for it that I think were from the 1950's. Yes, I'm sure it was the PA 6d coloured up.
Unfortunately, caramel was one of the standard ingredients in Maclay's Pale Ales. So when they started buying it would be no help.
If caramel does nothing but colour the beer, as some home brewing writers maintain, why did no-one notice That they all taste the same? The CAMRA description would suggest otherwise.
My experience is that caramel does make beer taste different. You can regard it as shoddy btewing practice - you can dislike the taste - but it does have that effect, and a lot of people remember beers like that with some affection.
Mike Austin, I didn't say that caramel colouring didn't have an effect on flavour. I think it does, having had beers + caramel.
I also didn't say that there was anything shoddy about brewing that way. I wouldn't have, because I don't think that.
Ron,
I didn't mean you! I avoided naming a well known writer on home brewing as I wanted to avoid some of the heated exchanges on the subject.
I have been full mash brewing since 1976, and some of the best beers I have made have been with the advantage of your research in the last few years.
I meant that people are free to disapprove of beer made this way, but plenty (You and I included, it would seem) don't.
Again, Not you!
Thanks
Ron
Given that it's well known that Scottish brewers were in the habit of colouring up their beer to suit different customers (at racking stage?) perhaps they had always been doing this to some extent.
John, that's true. But, from what I remember of Maclay's beers the 60/- was a lot darker than the 70/- and 80/-. When did they start colouring it that much? Did the at one point have both pale and dark versions of it?
I suppose I should look in the archive to see if there's a colour standard document.
Post a Comment