Our series of export beers continues, this time with another Export Stout. Truman's brewed quite a range of Porters and Stouts in the 19th century. In 1840, there were three: Running Stout, Double Stout and Export Stout. Unusually it wasn't strength that differentiated them. The gravities were very similar: 1080.1 (Running), 1081.2 (Export), 1083.1 Double. Not much between them there. The grists, however, did diffeer considerably.
What would you expect in a Porter/Stout of this period? Pale malt, brown malt, black malt and optionally amber malt. Truman's Stouts all contained the first three. Just in quite different proportions. As you can see:
Truman Stouts in 1840 | ||||
beer | pale | brown | black | lbs hops/barrel |
Running Stout | 90.50% | 7.60% | 1.90% | 5.18 |
Export Stout | 70.42% | 26.62% | 2.96% | 8.61 |
Double Stout | 73.73% | 23.89% | 2.39% | 6.42 |
Source: | ||||
Document B/THB/C/41 held at the London Metropolitan Archives. |
Unsurprisingly, the Export Stout is the most heavily hopped. Over 8 pounds a barrel. That's a lot. More than an IPA of the time. Makes you think.
Before anyone mentions it, I have noticed the difference between my grist for the Export Stout and Kristen's below. Truman's appear to have only employed brewers with terrible handwriting. It's a recurring theme in their brewing records, spanning a century and a half. The log upon which this recipe is based has some funny squiggles for the name of one malt. I think it's "Br" for brown malt. But it could be "A" for amber malt. See what you think. It's the third row:
I had been going to say that I had no idea where Truman sent their Stout. Then I did a quick search and found this:
Australia, then, was one of the destinations. No wonder they hopped it like crazy if it was going all that way.
That's me done for now. . . . . . . over to Kristen . . . . .
There isn’t really a whole lot to say about this beer. We’ve done some exporty porters and stouts before so none of this is really new. 4 base malts and 100% one hop. The only thing that I would caution on is the use of this much brown malt. If you haven’t used it before, make sure you let it have a good rest as there are a lot of dextrins in brown malt than can mess up your final OG unless you rest it long enough.
Advanced Mash – There was a short underlet but the single infusion worked pretty much exactly like the multi-infusion. Really, nothing special.
6 comments:
Looks to me like possibly two different brown malts?
180 Pale
73 Br 23 Taylor
15 Br 15 (13?)
270 qrs
80 Bushels
Any ideas about the numbers for the brown malts? Different maltsters with different profiles?
I used to live right next to a Truman pub (a photo of it, not my photo though: http://www.flickr.com/photos/matthewblack/4039927226/) not that it was in business at the time, but it was a nice looking place. Be interesting to try a beer that was possible drunk at the place.
The writting is horrendous. I used the other logs of the similar era to reference not just the malt but the handwritting. The older ones are even worse!
Point of fact, I used the wrong log to verify the grist of this Truman log. Less beer when doing these would be prudent.
Ron will get the correct one up here shortly.
Andrew, it's not 13, but the vertical equals sign ". So also Taylor.
In other logs where they use numbers like this it sometimes says "bin number". So one particular lot batch of malt.
Dave, Truman had some lovely pubs.
Start a brewery, buy some of the nicest ones back and resurrect the glory of Truman. That's the sort of totally impractical dreams I have.
Post a Comment