No need for me to go through the details of the recipe. Because – you guessed it – this beer was parti-gyled with PI 48/-. I like to include beers from the same parti-gyle. For the simple reason that I don’t want people to interpret slight differences between parti-gyles as actual differences in the individual beers.
In terms of gravity, PI 60/- is similar to an English AK. Making it a light Pale Ale. The weakest type produced South of the border.
The attenuation is slightly better than for 48/-. But I wouldn’t read too much into that. I’m sure that the true final gravities were lower. I’ve used the racking gravity from the brewing record. A week or two in cask would have knocked that down a bit.
1906 Drybrough PI 60/- | ||
pale malt | 7.75 lb | 76.39% |
flaked rice | 0.875 lb | 8.62% |
flaked maize | 0.50 lb | 4.93% |
No. 1 invert sugar | 0.50 lb | 4.93% |
No. 2 invert sugar | 0.50 lb | 4.93% |
Caramel 500 SRM | 0.02 lb | 0.20% |
Fuggles 120 mins | 0.67 oz | |
Fuggles 90 mins | 0.67 oz | |
Goldings 30 mins | 0.67 oz | |
Goldings dry hops | 0.50 oz | |
OG | 1045 | |
FG | 1015 | |
ABV | 3.97 | |
Apparent attenuation | 66.67% | |
IBU | 26 | |
SRM | 6.5 | |
Mash at | 148º F | |
Sparge at | 168º F | |
Boil time | 120 minutes | |
pitching temp | 60.5º F | |
Yeast | WLP028 Edinburgh Ale |
2 comments:
Would all the ales in the party gyle benefit from the long reduction boil of the first runnings or was that reserved for Deyborough’s wee heavy sweet ale?
No. Because that stuff about long reductive boils is bollocks. And this parti-gyle was just three Pale Ales.
Post a Comment