And where better to begin than Mild? At the time, one of Whitbread's biggest sellers. At the start of the period, they brewed just one Mild - XX. This had been introduced in 1940, replacing X Ale. Initially with a gravity of 1031, though by 1942 it was below 1030. A level it remained at until its demise in 1949. For a brief period in 1949, Whitbread brewed two Milds, XX at 1027.7 and B or Best Ale about three points higher.
Between 1950 and 1954, Best Ale was Whitbread's only Mild, then they introduced XXX at 1037.5 What I guess would have been called Best Mild, if their other Milds hadn't already been called Best Ale.
There are a couple of points I'd like to make about the brewing techniques. The boil times a very short, almost certainly a consequence of the war. In 1914, the two coppers used for X Ale were boiled for 1.75 hours. In the 1930's it was 1.25 hours for the first and 1.5 hours for the second. In 1940, it was down to 1.25 hours and 1 hour. By 1944, it was just 1 hour and 0.75 hours. The reasoning was simple: saving fuel.
Whitbread Mild Ale 1945 - 1954 | |||||||||||||
Date | Year | Beer | OG | FG | ABV | App. Attenuation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl | boil time (hours) | boil time (hours) | Pitch temp | length of fermentation (days) | colour |
31st Dec | 1945 | XX | 1027.8 | 1009.0 | 2.49 | 67.63% | 5.77 | 0.68 | 1 | 1 | 65º | 5 | 15 + 40 |
19th Oct | 1945 | XX | 1028.2 | 1008.5 | 2.61 | 69.86% | 5.77 | 0.72 | 1 | 1.33 | 65º | 6 | 13 + 40 |
22nd Jan | 1946 | XX | 1028.3 | 1009.0 | 2.55 | 68.20% | 5.77 | 0.70 | 1 | 1 | 65º | 5 | 14 + 40 |
29th Jan | 1947 | XX | 1027.7 | 1005.5 | 2.94 | 80.14% | 6.28 | 0.72 | 1 | 1 | 65º | 4 | 14 + 40 |
21st Jun | 1948 | XX | 1027.7 | 1006.0 | 2.87 | 78.34% | 7.03 | 0.82 | 1 | 1 | 65º | 4 | 11 + 40 |
22nd Jun | 1949 | B | 1030.5 | 1007.5 | 3.04 | 75.41% | 6.33 | 0.78 | 1 | 1 | 65º | 6 | 16 + 40 |
20th Oct | 1949 | Best Ale | 1029.1 | 1010.0 | 2.53 | 65.64% | 6.73 | 0.81 | 1 | 1.08 | 65º | 8 | 16 + 40 |
21st Jun | 1949 | XX | 1027.7 | 1007.5 | 2.67 | 72.92% | 7.26 | 0.83 | 1 | 1.25 | 65º | 5 | 13 + 40 |
16th May | 1950 | Best Ale | 1032.3 | 1008.0 | 3.21 | 75.23% | 7.13 | 0.89 | 1 | 0.75 | 65º | 5 | 18 + 40 |
17th Jul | 1951 | Best Ale | 1031.8 | 1009.0 | 3.02 | 71.70% | 7.32 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 65º | 5 | 15 + 40 | |
4th Feb | 1952 | Best Ale | 1030.8 | 1008.0 | 3.02 | 74.03% | 7.35 | 0.88 | 1 | 0.75 | 65º | 5 | 16 + 40 |
28th Jan | 1953 | Best Ale | 1030.6 | 1008.5 | 2.92 | 72.22% | 6.66 | 0.83 | 1 | 0.75 | 65º | 8 | 17 + 40 |
21st Jan | 1954 | Best Ale | 1031.0 | 1010.0 | 2.78 | 67.74% | 5.49 | 0.71 | 1 | 0.75 | 65º | 7 | 18 + 40 |
29th Sep | 1954 | MA | 1030.8 | 1010.5 | 2.69 | 65.91% | 5.66 | 0.72 | 1 | 1 | 65º | 6 | 120 |
29th Sep | 1954 | XXX | 1037.5 | 1012.0 | 3.37 | 68.00% | 5.66 | 0.88 | 1 | 1 | 65º | 7 | 125 |
Sources: | |||||||||||||
Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numbers LMA/4453/D/01/113, LMA/4453/D/01/114, LMA/4453/D/01/116, LMA/4453/D/01/117, LMA/4453/D/01/119, LMA/4453/D/01/120, LMA/4453/D/01/121 and LMA/4453/D/01/122. |
The pitching temperature, at 65º F, is pretty high, but more likely just a simple reflection of the very modest gravity of these beers. In general, the stronger the beer, the lower the pitching temperature, presumably because of the greater amount of heat generated by the fermentation of a stronger wort.
Talking of modest gravity, you'd have struggled to get very pissed on just about any of these beers. Only a couple poke their heads above 3% ABV. The weakest, I'd barely count as alcoholic drinks.
Moving on to the ingredients, you can see that there were some odd hops and hop extract or substitute used in the immediate postwar period. Britain was basically broke by the time hostilities ended and the first few years of peace were difficult ones. By the time the 1950's kick in, you can see that there's been a transformation in hop usage, with almost exclusively British hops being used, with the exception of occasionally a few Californian (CF) hops. It's one of the ironies of British brewing that imported hops became much less important after WW I and mostly disappeared in the two or three decades after WW II.
Whitbread Mild Ale 1945 - 1954 | ||||||||||
Date | Year | Beer | OG | hops | pale malt | crystal malt | MA malt | no. 3 sugar | other sugar - Hay | flaked barley |
31st Dec | 1945 | XX | 1027.8 | American and MK hops. Hopulon. | 7.51% | 63.33% | 10.02% | 1.97% | 17.17% | |
19th Oct | 1945 | XX | 1028.2 | Oregon, Old Continentals, and MK hops. | 7.51% | 63.33% | 10.02% | 1.97% | 17.17% | |
22nd Jan | 1946 | XX | 1028.3 | MK and EK hops. Hopulon. | 7.51% | 63.33% | 10.02% | 1.97% | 17.17% | |
29th Jan | 1947 | XX | 1027.7 | MK and Jugoslav hops. Hopulon. | 8.09% | 82.08% | 7.71% | 2.12% | ||
21st Jun | 1948 | XX | 1027.7 | MK and KT hops. Hopulon. | 20.79% | 7.87% | 63.48% | 5.99% | 1.87% | |
22nd Jun | 1949 | B | 1030.5 | MK hops. | 8.22% | 84.25% | 5.48% | 2.05% | ||
20th Oct | 1949 | Best Ale | 1029.1 | MK and KT hops. | 7.66% | 84.31% | 5.84% | 2.19% | ||
21st Jun | 1949 | XX | 1027.7 | MK and KT hops. | 7.98% | 85.55% | 4.56% | 1.90% | ||
16th May | 1950 | Best Ale | 1032.3 | MK, EK and Worcester hops. | 7.29% | 86.46% | 4.17% | 2.08% | ||
17th Jul | 1951 | Best Ale | 1031.8 | MK and CF hops. | 7.30% | 86.61% | 4.17% | 1.91% | ||
4th Feb | 1952 | Best Ale | 1030.8 | KT hops. | 7.30% | 86.61% | 4.17% | 1.91% | ||
28th Jan | 1953 | Best Ale | 1030.6 | MK hops. | 7.41% | 85.71% | 4.94% | 1.94% | ||
21st Jan | 1954 | Best Ale | 1031.0 | MK, EK and SX hops. | 6.74% | 80.31% | 11.05% | 1.90% | ||
29th Sep | 1954 | MA | 1030.8 | MK, EK and KT hops. | 6.35% | 80.42% | 11.29% | 1.94% | ||
29th Sep | 1954 | XXX | 1037.5 | MK, EK and KT hops. | 6.35% | 80.42% | 11.29% | 1.94% | ||
Sources: | ||||||||||
Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numbers LMA/4453/D/01/113, LMA/4453/D/01/114, LMA/4453/D/01/116, LMA/4453/D/01/117, LMA/4453/D/01/119, LMA/4453/D/01/120, LMA/4453/D/01/121 and LMA/4453/D/01/122. |
The grists aren't the most exciting you'll ever see. Whitbread hadn't used adjuncts before the war and the use of flaked barley was almost certainly dictated by the authorities. After 1946, no adjuncts were used. Though obviously lots of lovely sugar. Which is where most of the dark brown colour came from. As was typical in Milds of this period, there was no malt darker than crystal. I'm not sure why the sugar content fell in the first few years of the 1950's. That aside, the recipe was pretty stable: 7% crystal malt, 80-85% MA (mild ale) malt, 11% No. 3 sugar, 2% Hay sugar. That latter is some sort of proprietary sugar, which was presumably dark.
What should I do next - follow Mild through subsequent decades or look at the other styles for this same period?
10 comments:
All bow before mighty Hopulon!
Is the origin of Whitbread Trophy about to be revealed?
Matt,
soon, soon.
Interesting to see that the Whitbread brewing records are held in an accessible archive. I'm interested in the records of one of their former constituents - Tennant Brothers' Exchange Brewery in Sheffield. They were taken over by Whitbread but brewed continually until brewing ceased in 1993. Any clues as to where the Tennant records ended up would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Wheaty,
Whitbread were really good at preserving the brewing records of the breweries they took over. Originally, all of the records were kept in an archive at Chiswell Street. When Whitbread left brewing, their archive was broken up, with the material being deposited in archives local to where the brewery was located. That's why the Chiswell Street records are housed at the LMA.
Just had a quick look and, as expected, the Tennant's records are in the Sheffield Archives:
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/a2a/records.aspx?cat=199-200157&cid=-1#-1
It's not a full catalogue, but it does say there are brewing records there.
Can I ask a favour? If you photograph their brewing records can you pass on the pictures to me? I'd love to see the logs for the original version of Gold Label.
Mild dropped by something like 50% or more in some cases in ABV within living memory of some drinkers in the late 40's. Does anyone know if Andrew Campbell mentioned this? Why wasn't there a CAMRA created to protest against that? I guess because, i) the change was ongoing since WW I, ii) privation made people accept what they could get, iii) beer important as it is paled or rather darkened in comparison to national survival, importance of adequate food supplies and perhaps other entertainments.
Gary
Gary,
people got used to weaker beer, simple as that. Some welcomed the fall in strength caused by WW I, saying the pre-war beers had been too heavy.
What's revealing is how average gravity remained at 1037 when there were no external factors - like wars - dictating changes.
I trust you can make sense of this, Ron !
https://www.dropbox.com/s/glcafikvlpcw84i/Gold-Label.jpg
Whaety,
I can indeed. Thanks very much.
Stott,
it's a percentage of the weight. So 336 lbs for every quarter of malt, 224 lbs per quarter of sugar.
Post a Comment