Wednesday 26 October 2022

Let's Brew Wednesday - 1888 Tetley X

Despite all their newspaper adverts pushing their East India Pale Ale, in the 1880s Tetley was basically a Mild Ale brewery. They produced four different versions, all brewed single-gyle.

Bottom of the pile was X. Or rather, X with a line through it. Unlike other breweries, Tetley didn’t go from X to XXXX. Instead, all were a single X, just with varying numbers of horizontal lines through it. No idea why.

There are only three elements to the grist: mild malt, pale malt and sugar.  I’ve no idea what the last was exactly. I can’t really read the description. It looks something like “Inchity”. I’ve gone for a conservative guess with No. 2 invert.

The hops are more comprehensible: Kent from the 1886 and 1887 harvests, Alsace from 1886 and Altmark from 1887.

1888 Tetley X
pale malt 6.50 lb 66.67%
mild malt 2.25 lb 23.08%
No. 2 invert sugar 1.00 lb 10.26%
Fuggles 120 mins 0.75 oz
Strisselspalt 120 mins 0.75 oz
Goldings dry hops 0.25 oz
OG 1046
FG 1016.5
ABV 3.90
Apparent attenuation 64.13%
IBU 20
SRM 7
Mash at 148º F
Sparge at 165º F
Boil time 120 minutes
pitching temp 65º F
Yeast Wyeast 1469 West Yorkshire Ale Timothy Taylor

 

2 comments:

A Brew Rat said...

The note about Altmark hops got me curious, so I did a search and found this fascinating world hop report from 1931 online.

https://www.barthhaas.com/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/barth-berichte-broschueren/barth-berichte/englisch/1930-1940/barth-report-1930-1931.pdf

What I found fascinating is the table of imports of hops to the U.S. from 1928 to 1930, and the 1930 U.S. beer production of 28,000,000 hectoliters, despite it being the height of Prohibition.

Anonymous said...

I just finished reading this story today: „https://www.goodbeerhunting.com/blog/2022/10/27/beer-for-all-or-for-none-the-busch-lasker-controversy-of-1922“ - and I‘ve learnt that American brewers during prohibition produced „near beer“ by brewing regular beer and removing the alcohol afterwards.