Showing posts with label German month. Show all posts
Showing posts with label German month. Show all posts

Saturday, 1 May 2010

German breweries per state in 1865

Guess what? More 19th-century statistics. And I remembered it was German month. Not Austro-Hungarian month. That's May. Or is May Mild Month? I get confused.

A fascinating table today. Showing wonderfully the fragmentation of Germany on the eve of unification. And how much the density of breweries varied.


Number of breweries per German state in 1865
no. breweries male workers workers per brewery population pop per brewery
Prussia 6,817 11,026 1.62 21,793,900 3,197
Hannover 454 638 1.41 1,854,700 4,085
Kurhessen 332 402 1.21 738,500 2,224
Nassau 165 182 1.10 1,389,000 8,418
Hessen-Homburg 21 28 1.33 27,400 1,305
Frankfurt am Main 97 379 3.91 87,500 902
subtotal 7,886 12,655 1.60 25,891,000 3,283
Königreich Sachsen 619 1,324 2.14 1,916,700 3,096
Oldenburg 149 124 0.83 314,300 2,109
Braunschweig 90 189 2.10 292,700 3,252
Anhalt 77 120 1.56 193,000 2,506
Sachsen-Weimar 225 303 1.35 280,200 1,245
Sachsen-Coburg-Gotha 272 131 0.48 164,500 605
Sachsen-Meiningen 419 311 0.74 177,800 424
Sachsen-Altenburg 165 139 0.84 141,800 859
Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt 109 123 1.13 73,800 677
Schwarzburg-Sonderhausen 69 94 1.36 66,200 959
Reuss, jüngere Linie 94 106 1.13 86,500 920
Reuss, ältere Linie 61 79 1.30 43,900 720
Schaumburg-Lippe 31,400
Lippe-Detmold 27 47 1.74 111,300 4,122
Waldeck 25 34 1.36 59,100 2,364
Grossherztogthum Hessen Oberhessen 352 103 0.29 252,400 717
Grossherztogthum Hessen Unterhessen 289 409 1.42 564,500 1,953
Baden 859 1,306 1.52 1,369,300 1,594
Württemberg 2,026 3,313 1.64 1,748,300 863
Bavaria 5,385 9,727 1.81 4,774,600 887
Luxemburg 36 87 2.42 203,700 5,658
Total 19,234 30,724 1.60 38,757,000 2,015
Sources:
“Bericht über der Welt Ausstellung zu Paris im Jahre 1867, volume 7”, 1868, page 133.
http://www.populstat.info/

I find a couple of things amusing. Like Württemberg having more breweries per head of population than Bavaria. Or the most heavily-breweried states - Sachsen-Coburg-Gotha, Sachsen-Meiningen, Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt - all being in Thüringen (despite the Sachsen in two of their names.

419 breweries for 177,000 people. That's crazy. And it shows how far the USA has to go before being saturated with breweries. At least by 19th-century, central European standards.

In case you've forgotten, (and if your memory is as bad as mine you surely will have) in the same year Austria-Hungary had 3,138 breweries at a rate of one per 11,256 inhabitants. Or quite a way behind Germany. Today the situation is reversed, with Austria having more breweries per head than Germany. (Austria has 170 breweries at a rate of one per 48,087 inhabitants. Germany has 1,259 breweries at a rate of one per 66,468 inhabitants. I include the numbers as I assume many of you aren't sufficiently motivated to follow that link.)

I'm starting to enjoy these old stats. That's a threat.

Saturday, 17 April 2010

Lining casks with pitch

Pitch. And the age-old question: were British beer casks lined with pitch? Some swear blind that they were. What do I think? I'll tell you in a minute. After we've looked at some old texts.

First, one from the early in the 19th century. It's part of a discussion on the methods employed in German brewing:

"Great care is requisite in having the store-casks very clean and sweet before filling them, lest they should communicate a disagreeable flavour to the beer. In two towns, this is effected, after they are well washed, by smoking them with burning sulphur; but in the rest of Bavaria it is done by lining them with pitch. The following is the manner by which this is effected at Munich. The store-casks, in which the beer is cleansed, are previously pitched every time for summer beer, and once a year for winter beer. Pitching is practised in this way:—One end of the cask is taken out, and two English pounds of pitch for every barrel of its contents, if the pitching has only to be renewed (but double that quantity if for the first time), is set fire to on the bottom of the cask, and made to burn until the whole has become perfectly fluid. This being done, the fire is extinguished, by putting in the, head of the cask and driving the hoops close ; and then the cask is rolled about and turned in every direction, so that the pitch may be spread over every part of the inner surface, which it will thereby cover with a crust of one-eighth of an inch thick. This crust is apt to crack and blister, which causes the necessity of re-pitching every season. The professed object of this manipulation is cleanliness; but it doubtless communicates a peculiar flavour to the beer, which, however, is liked, and consequently required, by the customers of those brewers."
"The Art of Brewing" by David Booth, 1834, page 29.


Nothing directly about pitching barrels in British breweries, but the implication is that this is a pratice not known in Britain. There's no mention of "this is how we do pitching in Britain". And the impact of pitch on beer flavour is remarked upon. Not the most convincing piece of evidence, I will admit.

Let's look at another text from a couple of decades later:

"The German brewers, who have the repute of being far our superiors, have doubtlessly seen the inconvenience arising from the casks absorbing the beer, and inflicting injury by admitting the atmospheric air through their pores, both casks and contents suffering upon the decomposition of the imbibed fluids, and the consequent acidity of the wood. Hence their precaution of lining their casks with pitch. No such protection is taken by other brewers; but notwithstanding that such or any similar "new-fangled notion" may be jeered at by the anti-innovators of the British brewery, the subject assuredly deserves a little thought; and the author suggests that brewers' casks may be rendered more durable, and their pores may be effectually stopped, by subjecting all casks, whether old or new, to the following process."
"The theory and practice of brewing illustrated", by William Tizard, 1850, page 489.
This is much clearer. The Germans, clever devils that they are, did pitch their barrels. Britain's brewers, being a conservative bunch, didn't. I think this is very clear evidence against pitching in Britain.



Now a text from the early 20th century:

"The wooden casks used for the transport and storage of wine, beer, etc., are liable to become infested with mould fungi and other bacteria when lying empty, and must therefore be carefully cleansed, before use again, with boiling water and some disinfectant, such as lime, etc., and then dried. Even then, no security exists against the contamination of the liquid contents, or at any rate against their acquiring a flavour due to the cask. In the case of beer barrels, it has long been the practice (in some parts of the Continent) to line them with pitch, which, however, is liable to crack and peel off, so that not only is the beer contaminated with fragments of pitch, but the cracks in the coating afford an excellent harbouring place for the development of bacteria. It is true that shellac dissolved in spirit has also been used for varnishing the interior of these casks ; but that process in turn has drawbacks which preclude its employment in many cases."
"Casein, its preparation and technical utilisation" by Robert Scherer, 1911, pages 149-150.
That's pretty clear: pitching is something performed in parts of the Continent. So not in Britain.

To round off today's post, two fairly random passages about pitching barrels:

"Turbidity of beer due to resins is a very rare occurrence ; it is generally attributed to the separation of resins extracted from the hops. The author, however, cannot admit that hop resins are present in the beer in such quantities as to cause a visible turbidity. The small quantity which fails to settle out with the yeast is found in the sediments from the lager casks. The author has recently examined a number of samples of beer, more or less turbid, and possessing a distinct flavour of pitch. The microscopic examination of these turbid samples showed that the turbidity was caused solely by the presence of globules of resin. On applying pressure to the cover-glass it was found that these globules varied in consistency, as if the resin were dissolved in some solvent in varying proportions. The globules were separated by centrifugalising some of the beer; they were then placed on to gypsum plate to remove most of the water, and moistened with a reagent composed of a mixture of 5 c.c. of acetic anhydride and one or two drops of concentrated sulphuric acid. A violet coloration was thus developed—a conclusive proof that tho turbidity was caused, not by hop resins, but by rosin derived from the pitch lining of the casks. It is not yet clear how this pitch is absorbed by the beer, but it is very probably due to overheating when coating the casks, and the consequent formation of rosin oil, which appears as a bluish iridescent layer over the surface of the pitch after cooling. The microscopic appearance of the cuntrifugalised centrifugalised rosin particles may vary from characteristic globules, through intermediate forms, to roundish, indefinitely shaped particles, which tend to adhere in masses, and have a shrunken, honeycombed appearance, ranging from colourless to yellowish-brown."
"Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry, Volume 23", 1904, page 126.

So there were problems associated with lining barrels. I'm not sure I'd be happy if I found lumps of pitch in my pint.

And finally a positively scary property of lined barrels:


"A Cause of Explosions in Lining Casks with Pitch. By J. Brand (Zeits. ges. Brauw., 1901, 24, 481—483).
Several explosions have been recently recorded in the course of lining casks with pitch by means of the Theurer apparatus, some of which cases could not be due to the vapours lighting back from a fire since they were not conducted into a fire at all. In considering the question, the author recalled to mind the explosions produced by statical electricity generated by friction in the benzine (petroleum spirit) " dry cleaning " process ; and, in view of the probability of a similar generation of electricity through the friction of the hot pitch sprayed into the casks, conducted several experiments with a small Theurer apparatus and a number of 6-12 gallon casks. These casks were pitched, and then tested as quickly as possible by inserting through the bunghole, to the depth of about a foot, a very sensitive electroscope with aluminium leaves. In the case of casks which had come direct to the pitching apparatus, from being steamed out and therefore contained water vapour, only two out of ten gave any positive results ; but when dry casks were tried a decided movement of the electroscope leaves was noticed in six out of ten, the divergence of the leaves in some instances being found to correspond to a tension of 300 volts, capable of producing a 0.1 mm. spark. Whether the risk of similar explosions could be diminished by the introduction of water vapour into the casks the author leaves an open question, but, at any rate, he considers that pitch containing the minimum amount of turpentine and similar volatile constituents is safer to use than such samples as give off a large quantity of volatile matter at the temperature of the pitching operation (about 200° C.)."
"Journal of the Institute of Brewing, Volume 7", 1901, pages 516 - 517.

What do I think? Did British breweries pitch line their casks? No. At least not before WW I.

Thursday, 15 April 2010

Beer tax in 1867

It's funny the things you stumble across. Yesterday (for reasons I'm not going to explain here) I was searching for "Anton Dreher" in Google books. It threw up some fascinating material.

An overview of the Viennese brewing industry in the 1890's was one. It highlighted a point often misunderstood. That the brewery which transformed the industry in Austria-Hungary wasn't  Burgerbräu in Pilsen, but Dreher's brewery in Klein Schwechat on the outskirts of Vienna.

In a report on the World Exhibition I found this lovely table of beer tax receipts in various countries. Take a look:


Receipts form Beer Tax in 1867
country in Austrian guilders in original currency currency unit
UK
58,781,305
5,309,112
pounds Sterling
Austria
16,098,918
16,098,918
Austrian guilders
France
6,400,000
16,000,000
Francs
Belgium
5,822,035
14,535,000
Francs
Bavaria
2,620,450
8,500,000
southern guilders
Prussia
7,310,000
1,746,967
Thalers
Saxony
375,000
150,000
Thalers
USA
3,045,000
1,600,000
US dollars
Württemberg
1,290,000
1,500,000
southern guilders
Hannover
66,000
44,000
Thalers
Holland
433,500
510,000
Dutch guilders
Source:
“Bericht über der Welt_Ausstellung zu Paris im Jahre 1867, volume 7”, 1868, page 112.

That was educational. At least for me. I'd never realised that Württemberg and Bavaria used the same currency before unification. Or that a dollar was worth almost two Austrian guilders. Information that will be dead handy when I finally get my time machine fired up.

Unsurprisingly, it was Britain that generated the most tax income from beer. It had the biggest and most modern brewing industry in the world. And a large, relatively well-off, population of thirsty workers.

Bavaria, Prussia, Saxony, Württemberg and Hannover. That's five Germanies I've covered today. I'm really maintaining my theme this month. Hurray fior me.

Wednesday, 14 April 2010

Winterbier, Sommerbier (part four)

Finally. The tables I've been pronmising for a while. Finally I've published them. Don't all cheer at once.

First, Sommerbier:


Sommerbier
Year Brewer Beer FG OG ABV attenuation
1853 Deigelmeier Sommerbier 1022.0 1057.8 4.62 61.94%
1878 Durst Sommerbier 1013.0 1045.8 4.25 71.62%
1878 Eberle Sommerbier 1022.0 1062.6 5.25 64.86%
1886 Eppelheim, Heidelberg Sommerbier 1019.1 1050.1 4.00 61.88%
1853 Franziskaner Kloster Sommerbier 1012.0 1062.7 6.62 80.86%
1878 Hartmann Sommerbier 1018.0 1061.3 5.62 70.64%
1878 Hauser Sommerbier 5.63 0.00%
1852 Hofbräu Sommerbier 1018.0 1059.4 5.37 69.70%
1846 Hofbräuhaus, München Sommerbier 1011.0 1053.2 5.50 79.32%
1866 Hofbräuhaus, München Sommerbier 1014.1 1051.5 4.85 72.62%
1878 Hummel Witwe Sommerbier 1017.0 1065.0 6.25 73.85%
1878 Jean Schirmer Sommerbier 1018.0 1059.4 5.37 69.70%
1878 Leibner Sommerbier 1021.0 1063.4 5.49 66.88%
1886 Meclasheim, Heidelberg Sommerbier 1020.7 1059.4 5.00 65.12%
1878 Moos Sommerbier 1014.0 1055.3 5.37 74.68%
1878 Möser Sommerbier 1018.0 1049.9 4.12 63.93%
1886 Neuenheim, Heidelberg Sommerbier 1014.7 1050.3 4.62 70.78%
1878 Reisch Witwe Sommerbier 1015.0 1057.3 5.50 73.82%
1886 Rohrbach, Heidelberg Sommerbier 1017.6 1049.5 4.12 64.44%
1878 Schirmer Sommerbier 1016.0 1059.3 5.63 73.02%
1878 Schultz Sommerbier 1021.0 1067.2 6.00 68.75%
1878 Schwartz Sommerbier 1020.0 1065.3 5.88 69.37%
1878 Schwesinger Sommerbier 1019.0 1054.8 4.62 65.30%
1878 Sick Sommerbier 1018.0 1059.4 5.37 69.70%
1878 Villmann Sommerbier 1019.0 1063.3 5.75 69.98%
1886 Weinheim, Heidelberg Sommerbier 1019.9 1054.7 4.50 63.62%
1886 Weinheim, Heidelberg Sommerbier 1016.6 1051.4 4.50 67.67%
1878 Welz Sommerbier 1017.0 1062.2 5.88 72.67%
average 1017.47 1057.46 5.20 69.59%
Sources:
"Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs- und Genussmittel" by Joseph König, 1879, pages 147 - 158
"Handbuch der chemischen technologie mit besonderer berücksichtigung der gewerbestatistik" by Johannes Rudolf Wagner, 1875, page 614


And now Winterbier:


Winterbier
Year Brewer Beer FG OG ABV attenuation
1854 Ansbach Winterbier 1015.0 1045.9 4.00 67.32%
1854 Augsburg Winterbier 1013.0 1051.5 5.00 74.76%
1849 Augustinerbräu, München Winterbier 1018.0 1055.6 4.87 67.63%
1854 Bayreuth Winterbier 1016.0 1038.3 2.87 58.22%
1879 Eberle Winterbier 1016.0 1048.8 4.25 67.21%
1879 Friedrich Schirmer Winterbier 1010.0 1041.8 4.13 76.08%
1879 Hartmann Winterbier 1018.0 1051.8 4.37 65.25%
1879 Hauser Winterbier 1019.0 1058.6 5.13 67.58%
1879 Hummel Winterbier 1018.0 1054.7 4.75 67.09%
1879 Jean Schirmer Winterbier 1018.0 1059.4 5.37 69.70%
1854 Landshut Winterbier 1018.0 1050.9 4.25 64.64%
1879 Leibner Winterbier 1019.0 1058.6 5.13 67.58%
1853 Leistbräu, München Winterbier 1019.0 1050.9 4.12 62.67%
1866 Löwenbräu, München Winterbier 1017.0 1046.1 3.75 63.08%
1879 Moos Winterbier 1021.0 1061.5 5.24 65.85%
1879 Möser Winterbier 1014.0 1050.6 4.75 72.33%
1879 Pöhe Winterbier 1015.0 1050.7 4.63 70.41%
1880 Ponarther, Königsberg Winterbier 1022.2 1056.5 4.43 60.71%
1880 Schönbuscher, Königsberg Winterbier 1029.0 1067.8 5.00 57.23%
1879 Schultz Winterbier 1021.0 1060.6 5.13 65.35%
1879 Schultz (Wiener Brauerei) Winterbier 1023.0 1064.5 5.37 64.34%
1879 Schwartz Winterbier 1019.0 1054.8 4.63 65.33%
1879 Schwesinger Winterbier 1015.0 1048.8 4.38 69.26%
1879 Sick Winterbier 1020.0 1054.8 4.50 63.50%
1879 Sick Winterbier 1017.0 1057.5 5.26 70.43%
1879 Sick (Wiener Brauerei) Winterbier 1021.0 1059.6 4.99 64.77%
1879 Villmann Winterbier 1020.0 1062.4 5.50 67.95%
1879 Weltz Winterbier 1018.0 1054.7 4.75 67.09%
average 1018.19 1054.20 4.66 0.67
Sources:
"Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs- und Genussmittel" by Joseph König, 1879, pages 147 - 158
"Handbuch der chemischen technologie mit besonderer berücksichtigung der gewerbestatistik" by Johannes Rudolf Wagner, 1875, page 614

As the books stated, Sommerbier really was stronger than Winterbier. In the samples above, Sommerbier averaged 1057.46 and Winterbier 1054.2. Because the degree of attenuation was slightly higher in Sommerbier, there's an even bigger difference in the ABV: 4.66% for Winterbier and 5.2% for Sommerbier.

By modern standards, most of these beers have high OG's and rather poor attenuation. Only six beers have gravities below 1050. Few everday modern German Lagers are over 1048.

That's it, I think for Winterbier and Sommerbier. Unless I find anything else I beleive might tickle your fancy. Should you want your fancy tickled.