Based on the hugely diverging strengths is the samples - from 4.76% to 11.91% ABV - it's clear that they encompass several different types of beer. I'm not sure how meaningful any comparisons are going to be. But why let a little detail like that stop me? Especially now I've come so far.
I'm not just scratching my head, but turning my scalp into a bloodied mess, trying to work out which London beers these could be. Let's start off by saying what they aren't: Burton. At least not draught Burton. All are way too strong (draught Burton was 5% to 5.5% ABV). Even Fuller's Old Burton Extra is well short, strength-wise. Even Barclay Perkins KKKK was much weaker, 7 and a bit % ABV, 1080 OG.
No. 25 must have had a massive OG. It's 11% ABV and still has lots of unfermented stuff in it. Probably about as high as you reasonably go with gravity, 1140 or so. I'm sure I've never seen any 20th-century London beer anywhere near that level, other than Russian Stout.
As usual, we begin with London beers:
Composition of London Beers | |||||||
Calories per pint. | |||||||
Total Solids per cent. | Absolute Alcohol (by weight) per cent. | Ratio of Total Solids to Alcohol (T.S.=1). | ABV | Solid Matter. | Alcohol. | Total. | |
Strong Beers and Old Ales | |||||||
No. 23 | 4.65 | 7.00 | 1:1.50 | 8.89 | 108 | 278 | 386 |
No. 24 | 6.11 | 8.62 | 1:1.41 | 10.95 | 142 | 343 | 485 |
No. 25 | 9.55 | 8.72 | 1:0.91 | 11.07 | 222 | 347 | 569 |
No. 26 | 5.16 | 9.38 | 1:1.82 | 11.91 | 120 | 374 | 494 |
Average | 6.36 | 8.43 | 1:1.32 | 10.71 | 148 | 335 | 483 |
Source: | |||||||
Journal of the Institute of Brewing, Volume 38, Issue 1, January-February 1932, pages 84 - 88. |
The country beers are a real hotch-potch:
Composition of Country Beers | |||||||
Calories per pint. | |||||||
Total Solids per cent. | Absolute Alcohol (by weight) per cent. | Ratio of Total Solids to Alcohol (T.S.=1). | ABV | Solid Matter. | Alcohol. | Total. | |
Strong Beers and Old Ales | |||||||
No. 79 | 7.97 | 7.14 | 1:0.89 | 9.07 | 185 | 284 | 469 |
No. 80 | 6.04 | 5.27 | 1:0.87 | 6.69 | 141 | 209 | 350 |
No. 81 | 6.72 | 4.72 | 1:0.70 | 5.99 | 156 | 187 | 343 |
No. 82 | 10.42 | 5.28 | 1:0.50 | 6.71 | 243 | 210 | 453 |
No. 83 | 5.47 | 8.53 | 1:1.55 | 10.83 | 127 | 339 | 466 |
No. 84 | 6.12 | 4.28 | 1:0.69 | 5.44 | 142 | 170 | 312 |
No. 85 | 6.57 | 5.86 | 1:0.89 | 7.44 | 153 | 233 | 386 |
No. 80 | 3.89 | 3.75 | 1:0.96 | 4.76 | 91 | 149 | 240 |
No. 87 | 4.44 | 4.33 | 1:0.97 | 5.50 | 103 | 172 | 275 |
No. 88 | 5.13 | 4.52 | 1:0.88 | 5.74 | 119 | 180 | 299 |
Average | 6.27 | 5.36 | 1:0.85 | 6.81 | 146 | 213 | 359 |
Source: | |||||||
Journal of the Institute of Brewing, Volume 38, Issue 1, January-February 1932, pages 84 - 88. |
Some of the weaker ones look like the equivalent of a London Burton, while a couple look like Barley Wine. The lower ration of solids to alcohol in the country beers means that they must have been drier.
Finally the comparison of averages:
Strong Beers and Old Ales | Calories per pint. | ||||||
Total Solids per cent. | Absolute Alcohol (by weight) per cent. | Ratio of Total Solids to Alcohol (T.S.=1). | ABV | Solid Matter. | Alcohol. | Total. | |
London | 6.36 | 8.43 | 1:1.32 | 10.71 | 148 | 335 | 483 |
Country | 6.27 | 5.36 | 1:0.85 | 6.81 | 146 | 213 | 359 |
% difference | -1.44% | -57.28% | -0.77% | -57.28% | -1.37% | -57.28% | -34.54% |
I can see a pattern emerging now: more of everything in the London beers.
No comments:
Post a Comment