Showing posts with label Groves and Whitnall. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Groves and Whitnall. Show all posts

Thursday, 21 July 2011

Brewing Porter the Irish way (part one)

More Mr. Morewood and his impractically-titled book. It's a pretty good book, if poorly organised. Containing such gems as this description of Porter brewing in Ireland.

It starts with a general description:

"In the brewing of porter, the first mash should be heated in the copper to 150°, in the proportion of two barrels to each quarter of malt, which ought to be a mixture of best pale and brown malt, and should be kept mashing for about three-quarters of an hour, while the liquor should remain on the goods for an hour. The tap of the mash-tun is then opened to let off the liquor as quickly as possible, and the tap should be left open till the next liquor is brought into the tun that the goods may drain. In the mean time, the second liquor has been heating, and may, in from two to three hours, have acquired the heat of 160° ; the quantity being one barrel to a quarter of malt. Mash this, for half or three quarters of an hour; let it stand for one hour, and then let it be run off in the course of half an hour more. At about five and one-half hours from the beginning, the third mash should be made at 180°, the quantity being one barrel to the quarter; mash this for half an hour, let it stand an hour and tap as before.

A fourth liquor is seldom mashed, but if it be, it may be cold or blood warm, as it is of no use but to make the sour-beer for finings ; and it is of little consequence how it is done. Some brewers use it for the first liquor of the next brewing ; but this, perhaps, is not a good plan, as it may taint the whole brewing.

These worts are to be boiled with from twelve to fourteen pounds of hops to the quarter of malt, if the liquor is intended for keeping eight or twelve months; but, in the ordinary run of porter not intended for keeping, five pounds may be sufficient. The first worts should be boiled one hour, the second two, and the third four hours.

The worts are now to be cooled down as expeditiously as the weather will permit, to about 60°, if the medium heat of the atmosphere be about 60°. If it be more or less, allowance must be made. All the three worts are to be brought together into the gyle-tun, and about five pints of yeast to the quarter of malt put in, and due time allowed for fermentation and cleansing. The criterion for cleansing is the attenuation, and one great point in porter making is, that of separating the barm completely from the liquor. The proportion of colouring is arbitrary, as it greatly depends on the colour of the malt. Formerly it was the practice to employ Socotorine aloes, in the proportion of half an ounce to a barrel, in the second worts; and to give a retentive head, as much salt of steel as would lie on a half-crown piece was added with the finings to a barrel. Quassia, in the proportion of a pound to about twenty barrels, was used as a substitute for the aloes, and copperas for the salt of steel, but these ingredients being noxious and unwholesome, have been discontinued.

As the colour of porter is chiefly to be attributed to the quantity of brown or roasted malt used, care is taken to infuse such a quantity of that material as will produce the degree of colour required, and fining is effected by isinglass dissolved in stale beer, till it becomes of a glutinous consistence, a pint of which is the usual allowance for a barrel, but sometimes more is necessary.

A good colouring article is procured by moistening a quantity of brown sugar with water, spreading it in a frying-pan to about an inch deep, placed on a fire, and stirred until it is ignited; when it is burned sufficiently, the flame is extinguished, and water is added to the residuum till it has the consistency of molasses, and it is then mixed with the worts in the copper in such quantity as the depth of colour requires."
"A philosophical and statistical history of the inventions and customs of Ancient and Modern Nations in the Manufacture and Use of Intoxicating Liquors" by Samuel Morewood, 1838, pages 628 - 629.

That's quite a detailed description of the mashing process. Here's it in tabular form:


water temp time mashed time stood barrels water per quarter
Mash 1 150º F 45 60 2
mash 2 160º F 45 60 1
mash 3 180º F 30 60 1
total 4

Three or four mashes was usual practice in the early 19th century. Except for in Scotland, where they already started sparging. The process gradually spread to England in the middle of the century.


Can you guess what's coming now? Yes, it's contextualisation time. Let's look at how that compares with the mashing methods of London Porter breweries:


Barclay Perkins TT 1832
water temp barrels water per quarter
Mash 1 158º F 2.5
mash 2 178º F 1.5
mash 3 150º F 1.66
total 5.66
Source:
Barclay Perkins brewing record document ACC/2305/1/549 held at the London Metropolitan Archives


Reid Reg (Porter) 1841
water temp barrels water per quarter
Mash 1 146º F 2.5
mash 2 157º F 1.75
mash 3 153º F 1.83
total 6.08
Source:
Reid brewing record document 789/268 held at the Westminster CityArchives


Truman Runner 1845

water temp barrels water per quarter
Mash 1 162º F 1.875
mash 2 168º F 0.875
mash 3 167º F 1.33
mash 4 166º F 2
total 6.08
Source:
Truman brewing record document B/THB/C/36 held at the London Metropolitan Archives


Two differences are evident. Firstly, London brewers used relatively more water - around 6 barrels per quarter of malt compared to just 4 in the Irish method. Secondly, the second mash had the highest strike heat in London, whereas in Ireland it was the third mash hat was hottest. Though you can see that there was considerable variation in temperatures between the London brewers.

Morewood is usefully specific about hopping rates. Let's see how those compare to London:


Hopping rates (lbs per quarter)
Running Keeping
Irish Porter 5 14
1834 Whitbread P 12.5 14.64
1834 Barclay Perkins TT 12
1830 Truman Runner 14 20.5
Sources:
Whitbread brewing record document LMA/4453/D/09/027 held at the London Metropolitan Archives
Truman brewing record document B/THB/C/31 held at the London Metropolitan Archives
Barclay Perkins brewing record document ACC/2305/1/549 held at the London Metropolitan Archives

The rate given for Irish Running Porter looks very low. London brewers never went below 10 lbs per quarter. The Irish Keeping Porter figure is much more in line with London.

Next boil times. I've less London data for this as some of the older logs don't give any details of the boil. This is what I do have:


Boiling times
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Irish Porter 1 2 4
1834 Whitbread K 1 1.5 3 4
1834 Whitbread P 1 2 3
1834 Reid Reg 1.5 1.5 4.5
Sources:


Whitbread brewing record document LMA/4453/D/09/027 held at the London Metropolitan Archives
Reid brewing record document 789/268 held at the Westminster CityArchives

No great differences there. The worts are progressively boiled for longer as they get weaker. The final wort being boiled for ages in both London and Irelan.

Pitching temperatures I do have plenty of data on:

Pitching temperatures
Irish Porter 60º
1830 Truman Runner 64º
1831 Truman Keeping 64º
1834 Whitbread K 64º
1834 Whitbread P 64º
1834 Barclay Perkins TT 68º
Sources:
Truman brewing record document B/THB/C/31 held at the London Metropolitan Archives
Whitbread brewing record document LMA/4453/D/09/027 held at the London Metropolitan Archives
Barclay Perkins brewing record document ACC/2305/1/549 held at the London Metropolitan Archives


The London brewers pitched at a higher temperature than that Morewood gives for Ireland. But London brewers were notorious for fermenting their Porter warm.

Finally there are all the chemicals which, thankfully, he says were no longer used. Well, not by the larger brewers. As we've recently seen, there were London brewers prosecuted for the use of salt of steel and quassia. Though in all cases they were pretty small. None of the large London Porter brewers was ever prosecuted for this type of offence.

The colouring he describes is essentia bina. Which was surely illegal in both England and Ireland in 1838. It was, briefly, legal in the 1810's but in 1816, like all forms of sugar, its use in brewing was prohibited.

Still another part to go. Where Morewood describes the Guinness brewery.

Thursday, 9 June 2011

Let's Brew Wednesday - 1928 Barclay Perkins BBS Ex

As you may have realised, I've been in Bavaria for a week. Which is why there was no Let's Brew last week. Judging by Kristen's enthusiasm for today's beer, the wait has been worth it.

Barclay Perkins brewed a crazy number of different beers in the 1920's and 1930's. Especially Stouts. There were nine in all: BBS Ex, IBS, IBS Ex, TT, RNS, OMS, BS, SBS, BSc. To put this into context, Whitbread only brewed five Porters and Stouts: ES, S, P, LS and LOS. Two really, as ES, S, LS and LOS were identical. The Barclay Perkins beers were mostly separate brews. Though TT was sometimes party-gyled with BS or IBS Ex.

Barclay Perkins Stouts also covered a much wider range of strengths.  In 1928, Whitbread's Porter was 1028º and the Stouts 1056. And they were all party-gyled together. Barclay Perkins started with TT (Porter) at 1033º and went all the way up to IBS Ex at 1103º. BBS Ex, with a gravity in the high 1070's, was towards the top end.

Twenty years earlier, there were plenty of Stouts at a similar strength or stronger. But the gravity cuts resulting from WW I, left such beers rare, except for export versions.

I wonder which countries it was exported to? In the 19th century Barclay Perkins had exported beer all over the world: North America, Europe, Asia and Australia. Many of these markets had been lost by the 1920's, as British-style beers became less popular. Anyone have any evidence for where this beer went?






As I'm still knacked from my trip, that's all the bullshit you're going to get from. Time for Kristen to take the wheel . . . . .










Kristen’s Version:

As I said, this one is my very favorite of the export stouts we’ve done here at Barclay Perkins. Such a lovely beer with a ton of complexity and 3x the passion of other beers! Right!? That’s what counts!  It’s the delicious passion that one puts into making the beer. I’ve made this beer numerous ways. Here is the one I found works out best for me.

Ingredients
Grist – A nice and clean pale malt with a good malt flavor but not overwhelming works best. I really like Golden Promise for this. Paul’s Mild malt is pretty much mandatory or any other good rendition of a proper mild malt. Make sure its not ‘mild-like’ but proper mild malt. The American 6-row, at ~10%, really comes through pretty strong in the aroma. I particularly like this character but some hate it. If so, leave it out. The quality of the amber, black and brown malts are very important here. Use your favorite for sure. I find that the Fawcett Brown and Amber and then the Baird Black really work well together at these percent’s. Fawcett Black works equally as well, it just has a different character and I prefer the Baird. Now the Invert. I was under the impression previous to this beer that No3 works best for everything dark. While I do find this to be MOSTLY true, this is a very good instance when it wasn’t the case. These bigger stouts bring so much to the table that the huge amount of dark fruity awesomeness really muddies the waters. Too much of a good thing, apparently, can be too much. With the No3 it was just too much. When I used the No2 it was perfect. Make it. 
Hops –  This stout is not just hoppy but very hop forward. It has a hopping schedule very reminiscent of Pilsner Urquell. A long boil, hops broken into thirds and added throughout the boil. This also has a heavy hand at the dry hopping. Lower alpha acid hops work better in this beer as it gives you more of the tannin from the actual hop. Fuggles or Goldings work very very well. Same for the US versions. Each just a bit different. For the dry hopping make sure and chose something very fresh and similar to what you use in the boil. I find that 100% East Kent Goldings work perfectly. Goldings were added in the secondary and let sit for two weeks.
Yeast – Lots of yeast tried. The two best were the dry Nottingham and the West Yorkshire. Frankly, as long as you use a yeast that has good attenuation, the flavors really get covered up by everything going on in the beer. Stay away from the buttery ones. Stay away from the ‘minerally’ ones. The fruity ones seem to work best.

Processes
Advanced Mash – Similar for most of the bigger beers this one had a two step mash followed by an extended sparge. A simple dough-in with a short rest and then an underlet to the final temp. The mash temps are pretty high for this beer which can go a long way to explaining the high finishing gravity here.

Mash
ºF
ºC
Time
Dough in
153
67
30
Underlet
158
70
90

Sunday, 19 September 2010

Whitbread Porter 1805 - 1891

It's TT. No, not Barclay Perkins Porter.But close. TT - table time.

A few of you seem to like these things, so here's almost a century of Whitbread Porter grists:


Whitbread Porter 1805 - 1892
Year
OG
FG
ABV
App. Atten-uation
lbs hops/ qtr
hops lb/brl
boil time (hours)
boil time (hours)
boil time (hours)
boil time (hours)
Pitch temp
pale malt
brown malt
black malt
no. 3 sugar
total
1805
1052.6



10.41
3.12
1
2.5
5

70º
79.73%
20.27%
0.00%
0.00%
100.00%
1811
1054.0
1018.6
4.69
65.64%
9.51
2.85
1
2.5
4.5

65.5º
73.36%
26.64%
0.00%
0.00%
100.00%
1819
1055.4
1017.7
4.98
68.00%
10.03
2.64
1
2
3
4
63.75º
91.76%
7.49%
0.75%
0.00%
100.00%
1821
1057.9
1017.5
5.35
69.86%
9.01
2.34
1
1.5
2.75
3.75
65º
95.02%
3.83%
1.15%
0.00%
100.00%
1821
1058.7
1021.3
4.95
63.68%
9.74
2.55
1
1.5
2.75
3.75
65º
95.02%
3.83%
1.15%
0.00%
100.00%
1822
1059.3
1016.3
5.68
72.43%
10.61
2.84
1.17
1.5
3
4
63º
95.97%
2.93%
1.10%
0.00%
100.00%
1824
1060.1
1016.3
5.79
72.81%
13.17
3.47
1.17
1.5
3
4
64.5º
95.60%
3.26%
1.14%
0.00%
100.00%
1825
1059.0
1016.1
5.68
72.77%
12.80
3.28
1.17
1.5
3
4
64.5º
94.01%
4.33%
1.67%
0.00%
100.00%
1832
1058.2
1019.1
5.17
67.14%
12.72
3.31
1.25
2
4

64º
87.76%
10.88%
1.36%
0.00%
100.00%
1833
1058.7
1016.1
5.64
72.64%
12.48
3.17
1
1.5
3
4
63.5º
86.05%
12.36%
1.59%
0.00%
100.00%
1834
1059.6
1016.9
5.64
71.63%
12.48
3.52
1
2
3

64º
88.35%
9.67%
1.98%
0.00%
100.00%
1841
1063.4
1018.8
5.90
70.31%
12.24
3.53
1.5
1.5
3
4
64º
81.82%
15.64%
2.54%
0.00%
100.00%
1842
1061.2
1019.4
5.53
68.33%
10.52
2.66
1.5
1.5
3
4
63.25º
81.82%
15.64%
2.54%
0.00%
100.00%
1842
1062.3
1018.6
5.79
70.22%
11.29
2.85
1.5
1.5
3
4
63.5º
81.82%
15.64%
2.54%
0.00%
100.00%
1842
1062.6
1018.3
5.86
70.80%
10.62
2.72
1.5
1.5
3
4
63.75º
81.82%
15.64%
2.54%
0.00%
100.00%
1844
1063.7
1019.4
5.86
69.57%
11.30
2.88
1.5
1.5
3
4
64º
81.66%
15.61%
2.73%
0.00%
100.00%
1851
1065.1
1020.8
5.86
68.09%
11.11
3.55
1.5
1.5
2

64º
77.12%
19.72%
3.16%
0.00%
100.00%
1852
1056.0
1019.4
4.84
65.35%
10.41
2.88
1.5
1.5
2

64º
77.12%
19.72%
3.16%
0.00%
100.00%
1861
1053.5
1015.8
4.98
70.47%
10.37
2.63
1.5
1.5
2

64º
76.69%
19.75%
3.56%
0.00%
100.00%
1862
1054.6
1015.5
5.17
71.57%
10.03
2.25
1.5
2
2

64º
78.64%
17.44%
3.92%
0.00%
100.00%
1871
1058.2
1017.7
5.35
69.52%
13.28
3.07
1.5
2
2

64º
84.84%
9.48%
5.69%
0.00%
100.00%
1873
1059.3
1022.7
4.84
61.68%
11.64
2.65
1.5
2


64º
94.63%
0.00%
5.37%
0.00%
100.00%
1876
1056.2
1011.4
5.94
79.80%
8.49
1.98
1.5
2


61º
80.12%
14.55%
5.33%
0.00%
100.00%
1877
1055.1
1014.4
5.39
73.87%
4.81
1.30
1.5
2.17


61º
78.97%
15.29%
5.73%
0.00%
100.00%
1880
1055.1



5.49
1.34
1.5
2


61º
86.25%
8.40%
5.35%
0.00%
100.00%
1881
1054.6
1010.8
5.79
80.20%
8.77
2.08
1.5
2


60º
80.64%
13.22%
6.14%
0.00%
100.00%
1892
1057.9
1015.0
5.67
74.09%
7.58
1.63
2
2


60º
80.35%
6.73%
6.73%
6.18%
100.00%
Source:
Whitbread brewing records



As you can see, Whitbread were pretty conservative in terms of ingredients. Only three types of malt were used and at the end of the century a bit of invert sugar.

I was intrigued by how the brown malt percentage fell dranmatically sfter the introduction of black malt. Then rose again until about the middle of the century. The trend with black malt is much simpler - an uninterrupted rise as the century progressed.

That's it for now. I have to get back to my shift down the number mine. Lets hope there are no explosions.