Showing posts with label Brausteuergebiet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brausteuergebiet. Show all posts

Wednesday, 13 August 2014

Change in Beer production in the German customs area 1872 - 1881

If the title didn't put you off, all I can say is: you're my perfect reader.

I'd planned pointing out all sorts of clever stuff. Then I thought: you're not stupid. You can see it for yourself. Why should I condescendingly lead you by the hand?

Change in Beer production in the German customs area 1872 - 1881
Year Reichssteuergebiet Bayern Württemberg
hl % change hl % change hl % change
1872 16,102,179 10,905,836 4,197,274
1873 19,654,903 22.06% 11,256,208 3.21% 3,995,056 -4.82%
1874 20,494,914 4.27% 12,079,760 7.32% 3,596,144 -9.99%
1875 21,358,228 4.21% 12,084,910 0.04% 3,662,418 1.84%
1876 20,873,379 -2.27% 12,347,153 2.17% 3,879,006 5.91%
1877/78 20,360,491 -2.46% 12,205,377 -1.15% 3,801,519 -2.00%
1878/79 20,371,925 0.06% 12,122,483 -0.68% 3,067,305 -19.31%
1879/80 19,984,613 -1.90% 12,152,532 0.25% 3,172,634 3.43%
1880/81 21,136,031 5.76% 11,821,915 -2.72% 3,396,292 7.05%
1881/1882  19,244,000 -8.95% 11,826,000 0.03% 3,396,000 -0.01%
change 1872 - 1882 19.51% 8.44% -19.09%
1885/86  22,105,000 14.87% 12,655,000 7.01% 2,879,000 -15.22%
1890/91  29,374,000 32.88% 14,427,000 14.00% 3,508,000 21.85%
1891/92  29,695,000 1.09% 14,490,000 0.44% 3,454,000 -1.54%
change 1882 - 1892 54.31% 22.53% 1.71%
1892/93  30,186,000 1.65% 15,104,000 4.24% 3,749,000 8.54%
1893/94  31,290,000 3.66% 15,025,000 -0.52% 3,478,000 -7.23%
1894/95  30,916,000 -1.20% 15,186,000 1.07% 3,493,000 0.43%
1895/96  34,337,000 11.07% 16,034,000 5.58% 3,885,000 11.22%
1896/97  34,904,000 1.65% 16,206,000 1.07% 3,796,000 -2.29%
1897/98  37,707,000 8.03% 16,982,000 4.79% 4,100,000 8.01%
1898/99  38,465,000 2.01% 17,455,000 2.79% 4,069,000 -0.76%
1899/1900  39,320,000 2.22% 17,739,000 1.63% 4,128,000 1.45%
change 1892 - 1900 32.41% 22.42% 19.51%
change 1882 - 1900 104.32% 50.00% 21.55%
change 1872 - 1900 144.19% 62.66% -1.65%
Source:
Jahresbericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie 1882, 1883, page 871.
https://archive.org/stream/jahresberichtbe02gottgoog#page/n900/mode/2up


Change in Beer production in the German customs area 1872 - 1881
Year Baden Alsace-Lorraine Total
hl % change hl % change hl % change
1872 926,957 812,454 32,944,700
1873 1,094,634 18.09% 987,752 21.58% 36,988,553 12.27%
1874 1,133,865 3.58% 889,191 -9.98% 38,193,874 3.26%
1875 1,066,661 -5.93% 763,313 -14.16% 38,935,530 1.94%
1876 1,050,841 -1.48% 706,694 -7.42% 38,857,073 -0.20%
1877/78 1,098,500 4.54% 803,136 13.65% 38,269,023 -1.51%
1878/79 1,085,020 -1.23% 787,905 -1.90% 37,434,638 -2.18%
1879/80 1,085,655 0.06% 788,542 0.08% 37,183,976 -0.67%
1880/81 1,155,450 6.43% 982,659 24.62% 38,492,347 3.52%
1881/1882  1,155,000 -0.04% 932,000 -5.16% 36,663,000 -4.75%
change 1872 - 1882 24.60% 14.71% 11.29%
1885/86  1,244,000 7.71% 691,000 -25.86% 39,822,000 8.62%
1890/91  1,679,000 34.97% 837,000 21.13% 49,925,000 25.37%
1891/92  1,643,000 -2.14% 875,000 4.54% 50,268,000 0.69%
change 1882 - 1892 42.25% -6.12% 37.11%
1892/93  1,714,000 4.32% 912,000 4.23% 51,795,000 3.04%
1893/94  1,710,000 -0.23% 907,000 -0.55% 52,528,000 1.42%
1894/95  1,728,000 1.05% 869,000 -4.19% 52,311,000 -0.41%
1895/96  1,914,000 10.76% 997,000 14.73% 57,299,000 9.54%
1896/97  2,192,000 14.52% 937,000 -6.02% 48,169,000 -15.93%
1897/98  2,741,000 25.05% 964,000 2.88% 62,649,000 30.06%
1898/99  2,947,000 7.52% 1,058,000 9.75% 64,164,000 2.42%
1899/1900  3,095,000 5.02% 1,128,000 6.62% 65,621,000 2.27%
change 1892 - 1900 88.37% 28.91% 30.54%
change 1882 - 1900 167.97% 21.03% 78.98%
change 1872 - 1900 233.89% 38.84% 99.19%
Source:
Jahresbericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie 1882, 1883, page 871.
https://archive.org/stream/jahresberichtbe02gottgoog#page/n900/mode/2up

Must be pretty obvious what's important. Don't disappoint me by asking questions.

OK, I'll tell you a bit. In the whole Empire beer production almost exactly dubbled between 1882 1872 and 1900. But the vast majority of that growthcame after 1882. But that growth was very unevenly distributed. The Reichssteuergebiet was a  big winner with growth 45 points above the average for the Empire.

Biggest loser was Württemberg, where output actually fell. While neighbouring Baden saw massive growth, especially after 1890 and was clsoing in on Württemberg. Bayern also lost ground, with growth 36 points below average.

My conclusions? A shift in the focus of German brewing from the South to the North. But also a period of general quite rapid growth of beer output.

Monday, 11 August 2014

German Beer Production 1872 - 1881

If you haven't realised my love for numbers yet you're either a new reader or a dozy twat. I'd like to think none of you are in the latter category.

That should warn you that we're headed for a very number-heavy post. All kicked off by some statistics I stumbled upon in a 19th-century German technical publication, the unputdownable "Jahresbericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie 1882". It had me literally in stitches*.

The numbers cover the first years of the newly-founded German Empire. It was a very dynamic time in Germany. Political union brought all sorts of economic advantages with it and the German economy boomed. Rapid industrialisation was accompanied by a surge in population, which grew from 41 million in 1871 to 56 million in 1900. And, it being Germany, those extra 15 million souls drank beer. Any guesses as to what the trend in German beer output might be over these years?  It doesn't take a genius to work that one out.

Let's get the barrel rolling with the initial set of numbers that kicked my mind off working. But first a little explanation. The German Empire was a complicated place. It wasn't a centralised state the way modern countries are. As a leftover from the way the country was nailed together in the 1870's, there were anomalies in various areas. Like beer tax. Several systems of beer taxation were in use in different parts.

That's why this table is split up in such a weird way. It's divided by beer tax district, which isn't the same as the administrative divisions - the equivalent of modern Germany's states. There was a standard system in much of the country - basically the bits the Prussians had controlled before unification. That's the Reichssteuergebiet (also called the Brausteuergebiet) - the Empire Tax Area. Then there were the traditional brewing regions of the South: Bavaria, Württemberg and Baden who retained their own system of taxing beer. Finally the newly-annexed territory of Alsace-Lorraine.

One last point. The way it's divided up tells us the source of these figures: tax authorities.

Ah, just found some numbers that continue from the first set, neatly doubling the size of the table. How brilliant is that?

Beer production in the German customs area 1872 - 1881 (hl)
Year Reichssteuergebiet Bayern Württemberg Baden Alsace-Lorraine Total
1872 16,102,179 10,905,836 4,197,274 926,957 812,454 32,944,700
1873 19,654,903 11,256,208 3,995,056 1,094,634 987,752 36,988,553
1874 20,494,914 12,079,760 3,596,144 1,133,865 889,191 38,193,874
1875 21,358,228 12,084,910 3,662,418 1,066,661 763,313 38,935,530
1876 20,873,379 12,347,153 3,879,006 1,050,841 706,694 38,857,073
1877/78 20,360,491 12,205,377 3,801,519 1,098,500 803,136 38,269,023
1878/79 20,371,925 12,122,483 3,067,305 1,085,020 787,905 37,434,638
1879/80 19,984,613 12,152,532 3,172,634 1,085,655 788,542 37,183,976
1880/81 21,136,031 11,821,915 3,396,292 1,155,450 982,659 38,492,347
Average 1872 - 1881 20,037,407 11,886,242 3,640,850 1,077,509 835,738 37,477,746
per head of population 62 285 192 71 54 88
1881/1882  19,244,000 11,826,000 3,396,000 1,155,000 932,000 36,663,000
1885/86  22,105,000 12,655,000 2,879,000 1,244,000 691,000 39,822,000
1890/91  29,374,000 14,427,000 3,508,000 1,679,000 837,000 49,925,000
1891/92  29,695,000 14,490,000 3,454,000 1,643,000 875,000 50,268,000
1892/93  30,186,000 15,104,000 3,749,000 1,714,000 912,000 51,795,000
1893/94  31,290,000 15,025,000 3,478,000 1,710,000 907,000 52,528,000
1894/95  30,916,000 15,186,000 3,493,000 1,728,000 869,000 52,311,000
1895/96  34,337,000 16,034,000 3,885,000 1,914,000 997,000 57,299,000
1896/97  34,904,000 16,206,000 3,796,000 2,192,000 937,000 48,169,000
1897/98  37,707,000 16,982,000 4,100,000 2,741,000 964,000 62,649,000
1898/99  38,465,000 17,455,000 4,069,000 2,947,000 1,058,000 64,164,000
1899/1900  39,320,000 17,739,000 4,128,000 3,095,000 1,128,000 65,621,000
Source:
"Jahrbuch der Versuchs- und Lehranstalt für Brauerei in Berlin, 1911", p.585-589
Jahresbericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie 1882, 1883, page 871.
https://archive.org/stream/jahresberichtbe02gottgoog#page/n900/mode/2up


In terms of per capita production, Bavaria and Württemberg are way out in front. Wondering why Baden is so far behind the other southern regions in terms of beer output? The answer is simple: it's more wine country.

Now let's look at that in terms of percentage of total output. (These are derived from the figures in the first table.)

Beer production in the German customs area 1872 - 1881 (%)
Year Reichssteuergebiet Bayern Württemberg Baden Alsace-Lorraine
1872 48.88% 33.10% 12.74% 2.81% 2.47%
1873 53.14% 30.43% 10.80% 2.96% 2.67%
1874 53.66% 31.63% 9.42% 2.97% 2.33%
1875 54.86% 31.04% 9.41% 2.74% 1.96%
1876 53.72% 31.78% 9.98% 2.70% 1.82%
1877/78 53.20% 31.89% 9.93% 2.87% 2.10%
1878/79 54.42% 32.38% 8.19% 2.90% 2.10%
1879/80 53.75% 32.68% 8.53% 2.92% 2.12%
1880/81 54.91% 30.71% 8.82% 3.00% 2.55%
Average 1872 - 1881 53.46% 31.72% 9.71% 2.88% 2.23%
1881/1882  52.49% 32.26% 9.26% 3.15% 2.54%
1885/86  55.51% 31.78% 7.23% 3.12% 1.74%
1890/91  58.84% 28.90% 7.03% 3.36% 1.68%
1891/92  59.07% 28.83% 6.87% 3.27% 1.74%
1892/93  58.28% 29.16% 7.24% 3.31% 1.76%
1893/94  59.57% 28.60% 6.62% 3.26% 1.73%
1894/95  59.10% 29.03% 6.68% 3.30% 1.66%
1895/96  59.93% 27.98% 6.78% 3.34% 1.74%
1896/97  72.46% 33.64% 7.88% 4.55% 1.95%
1897/98  60.19% 27.11% 6.54% 4.38% 1.54%
1898/99  59.95% 27.20% 6.34% 4.59% 1.65%
1899/1900  59.92% 27.03% 6.29% 4.72% 1.72%

Isn't that fascinating? It shows a long-term trend of the North of Germany producing a large percentage of the total at the expense of Bavaria and even more so from Württemberg. That can easily be explained. It was in the North where most of the industrialisation was taking place. And where large, modern, bottom-fermenting breweries were starting to appear, replacing small, old-fashioned top-fermenting breweries.

I'll be doing some more playing around with these numbers. I like to make statistics dance for their tea.





* I fell asleep while reading it and fell onto a glass, slashing my palm open.

Monday, 19 May 2014

Rice in German beer (again)

I know. Obsessing about rice in German beer is weird. I just can't help myself.

There are other things I should be up to. Like researching Dutch Lager styles. I'm supposed to be giving a talk on that soon. Or German sour beers. Another topic I'll soon be lecturing about. So far I've only piled up Dutch brewery histories on the floor behind me. I spent a big chunk of yesterday hunting for  a Heineken history, only to find it within reach of where I sit. That's the main drawback of my way of sorting my books. The just-remembering-where-it-is method.

But I digress. I'm supposed to be telling you aboout rice in German beer, amongst other things. Spinning a tale around a table of dull statistics from a hundred year old chemistry magazine. (Jahresbericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie, if you're interested.)

I guess first I'd best explain what the statistics are for: the Brausteuergebied. What was that? The part of the German Empire with a unified beer tax regime. It literally means Beer Tax Area. It's easier to explain what it wasn't, rather than what it was. Everywhere except Bavaria, Baben, Württemberg and Alsace-Lorraine. Most of the country, really, but missing the major brewing areas in the South.

Right, what to tell you first? One of the most obvious is the rise of Lager. While the output of top-fermenting beer was flat, the production of bottom-fermenting beer more than tripled. The result was that the chare of top-fermenting beer more than halved from 36% to 16%. It was a trend that continued in the 20th century.

Use of taxable raw materials and beer production in the Brausteuergebied
tax year 1 April - 31st March use of taxable brewing materials
grain malt substitutes quantity of beer brewed in 1 hl of beer
total ground barley malt total rice all types of sugar all types of syrup top fermenting bottom fermenting top fermenting bottom fermenting grain and rice malt substitutes
hk hk hk hk hk hk hl hl % % k k
1882 4,469,280 4,328,286 22,611 3,755 13,591 1598 7,901,207 14,211,973 36 64 20.23 0.09
1887 5,503,903 5,354,779 43,312 9,684 25,434 2358 8,503,919 18,971,927 31 69 20.07 0.12
1892 6,330,765 6,168,393 87,164 50,767 28,649 2129 7,664,889 25,498,919 23 77 19.24 0.11
1883 6,553,787 6,356,370 91,535 51,074 27,468 1641 7,522,307 26,854,999 22 78 19.15 0.12
1894 6,435,636 6,246,062 109,090 67,805 27,922 1651 7,111,305 26,856,048 21 79 19.15 0.12
1896 7,029,267 6,824,308 119,382 75,782 28,551 1757 7,884,114 29,841,501 21 79 18.83 0.12
1896 7,118,439 6,914,923 121,055 75,957 29,576 1558 7,544,730 30,803,611 20 80 18.76 0.12
1897 7,590,880 7,380,322 142,067 98,669 31,732 1474 7,777,049 33,654,123 19 81 18.55 0.12
1898 7,644,366 7,444,983 157,596 102,254 36,720 1606 7,566,770 34,698,630 18 82 18.33 0.13
1899 7,810,734 7,619,275 157,663 98,090 42,123 1515 7,280,851 35,925,271 17 83 18.30 0.14
1900 8,007,273 7,811,851 149,809 89,573 42,112 2009 7,428,980 37,300,826 17 83 18.10 0.13
1901 7,964,681 7,782,839 149,620 87,371 42,571 3013 7,322,999 37,712,996 16 84 17.88 0.14
Note:
The taxed export beers of Bremen are not included
Source:
Jahresbericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie, 1903 page 446.

On a side note, you can see how barley was pretty much the only grain used. Which is interesting, as many of the old North German top-fermenting styles contained wheat. They were clearly being brewed in tiny quantities.

Rice was by quite a long way the most popular adjunct, though in comparison with barley malt, not a great deal was used. I'm surprised at how little sugar was used. It's such handy stuff. It would be great to have figures for how much sugar is used in German brewing today. I can't remember ever seeing statistics for that. The Deutsche Brauerbund probably isn't keen on advertising the fact German brewers use sugar. Even though they always have. (The Reinheitsgebot allows sugar in top-fermenting beers.)

Just for fun, I've calculated the average OG of the beers. I've based it on 80 brewers pound per quarter of malt. A hectokilo, the unit used in the table, is just about exactly two hundredweight, or two-thirds of a quarter. You can see that it looks much like modern German beer, strength-wise:

year average OG
1882 1049.1
1887 1048.7
1892 1046.4
1883 1047.4
1894 1046.4
1896 1045.3
1896 1045.1
1897 1044.5
1898 1044.0
1899 1044.0
1900 1043.5
1901 1043.0

Was gravity really falling or were they just getting more from the malt? I'd suspect the latter, but could be wrong.