At just 3º stronger than AK, you have to wonder what the hell the point of it was. Having two Pale Ales of such a similar strength seems rather redundant. The only reason I can think of is if one was draught and the other bottled. A lower degree of attenuation leaves PA with the same ABV.
There’s one big difference in the recipes of AK and PA: flaked maize. It made up around 10% of AK’s grist, while it was absent in PA. Which I suppose means PA was a classier beer. Perhaps.
PA has a slightly higher hopping rate of 3.75 lbs per quarter (336 lbs) of malt compared to AK’s 3.25 lbs. Which inevitably leads to s slightly higher (calculated) IBU count. A shitload of different hops again: English from the 1909, 1911 and 1912 seasons, and Californian from 1911. The dry hops were English from 1911 and 1912, and Californian from 1911.
| 1913 Boddington PA | ||
| pale malt | 10.00 lb | 97.37% |
| No. 2 invert sugar | 0.25 lb | 2.43% |
| caramel 2000 SRM | 0.02 lb | 0.19% |
| Cluster 155 mins | 0.50 oz | |
| Fuggles 90 mins | 0.75 oz | |
| Goldings 30 mins | 0.50 oz | |
| Goldings dry hops | 0.25 oz | |
| Cluster dry hops | 0.125 oz | |
| OG | 1045 | |
| FG | 1014 | |
| ABV | 4.10 | |
| Apparent attenuation | 68.89% | |
| IBU | 27 | |
| SRM | 8 | |
| Mash at | 155º F | |
| Sparge at | 161º F | |
| Boil time | 155 minutes | |
| pitching temp | 61.5º F | |
| Yeast | Wyeast 1318 London ale III (Boddingtons) | |


1 comment:
What was the price of it? Perhaps they needed a product they could sell slightly cheaper?
Post a Comment