Stout. There's loads of rubbish been written about British Stouts after WW I. Mostly about them all being sweet. M & B's Stouts show how wrong that generalisation is. In the 1920's and 1930's, with attenuation over 80%, M & B's Stouts would have been drier than Guinness. The attenuation fell a bit after WW II, but was still mostly hovering close to 80%.
There's limited data, but it looks to me like we've an example of style splitting with Nourishing Stout and Extra Stout. The date where Extra Stout appears is important, 1932. That's in the chaotic period of an unwise jump in beer tax between 1931 and 1933. It was a disaster all round. Brewers dropped gravities to keep the retail price the same and the tax collected fell.
What some breweries did, when they perceived a demand for a beer at the old strength, was to introduce a "new" product, that was basically the old beer, just with a new name. Barclay Perkins did this with their Mild, introducing XX Ale at the same strength as X Ale had been before the gravity drop. Extra Stout looks like one of these beers. Look how the gravity of Nourishing Stout fell from 1048º to 1043º and Extra Stout appears at 1049º.
I'm astonished to see that M& B's two Stouts not only survived the war, but remained at pretty much the same gravities. I'm struggling to think of any other beer - export versions excepted - where that's true.
That Amba is a funny one: a pale Old Ale. Old Ale was popular in the West Midlands before WW II - still is to some extent. But it's usually a dark beer. Always, really. It would be great to know more about the beer's history.
And blow me if there isn't another beer that's the same gravity either side of WW II, Strong Ale. (I've just thought of another example. Seeing that 1106 OG has reminded me: Barclay's Russian Stout. That managed to navigate both World Wars with no drop in gravity.) It's a pretty powerful beer, with a decent attenuation for such a high gravity
You're probably thinking (hoping?) that this series is over now. It isn't, there's more M & B to come.
Mitchell & Butler Strong Ale and Stout 1926 – 1954 | |||||||||||
Year | Beer | Style | Price | size | package | Acidity | FG | OG | colour | ABV | App. Atten-uation |
1926 | Nourishing Stout | Stout | 8d | pint | bottled | 1048.7 | |||||
1929 | Nourishing Stout | Stout | 8.5d | pint | bottled | 0.07 | 1006.3 | 1048.4 | 5.5 | 86.98% | |
1931 | Nourishing Stout | Stout | 9d | pint | bottled | 1005 | 1046.1 | 5.4 | 89.15% | ||
1932 | Nourishing Stout | Stout | 9d | pint | bottled | 0.06 | 1006.7 | 1043 | 4.7 | 84.42% | |
1932 | Extra Stout | Stout | 8d | pint | bottled | 0.06 | 1006.8 | 1049 | 5.5 | 86.12% | |
1951 | Nourishing Stout | Stout | 1/5d | pint | bottled | 0.04 | 1007.4 | 1042.8 | 1 + 10 | 4.6 | 82.71% |
1951 | Extra Stout | Stout | 10.5d | half | bottled | 0.04 | 1009 | 1048 | 1 + 9 | 5.1 | 81.25% |
1951 | Nourishing Stout | Stout | 1/6d | pint | bottled | 0.07 | 1007.3 | 1042.1 | 1 + 12 | 4.5 | 82.66% |
1953 | Nourishing Stout | Stout | 10d | half | bottled | 0.06 | 1006.5 | 1039.2 | 1 + 11 | 4.3 | 83.42% |
1953 | Extra Stout | Stout | 1/- | half | bottled | 0.05 | 1008.2 | 1049 | 1 + 11 | 5.3 | 83.27% |
1953 | Extra Stout | Stout | 1/- | half | bottled | 0.05 | 1009.8 | 1046.2 | 21 B | 4.7 | 78.79% |
1954 | Extra Stout | Stout | 1/- | half | bottled | 0.05 | 1011.2 | 1049 | 1 + 14 | 4.9 | 77.14% |
1962 | Extra Nourishing Stout | Stout | 13d | half | bottled | 0.05 | 1012.2 | 1037.1 | 275 | 3.1 | 67.12% |
1960 | Export Lager | Lager | 16d | half | bottled | 0.02 | 1010 | 1039.7 | 7.5 | 3.7 | 74.81% |
1958 | Amba Pale Old Ale | Old Ale | 15d | nip | bottled | 0.04 | 1012.4 | 1056.3 | 18 | 5.5 | 77.98% |
1932 | Strong Ale | Strong Ale | 10d | half | bottled | 0.12 | 1023.9 | 1108 | 11.1 | 77.87% | |
1935 | Strong Ale | Strong Ale | 9d | half | bottled | 0.11 | 1022.7 | 1109 | 11.4 | 79.17% | |
1953 | Strong Ale | Strong Ale | 2/4d | half | bottled | 0.19 | 1026.5 | 1106 | 6 + 40 | 10.5 | 75.00% |
Sources: | |||||||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001 | |||||||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/002 |
12 comments:
I watched the Morse prequel Endeavour last night. In one scene, the young Morse is dead on his feet and the inspector offers him a glass of brandy but his wife overrules him and fetches a bottle of stout from the cupboard to "build him up".
Ah, "Nourishing Stout" !
How long before it's classed as a style by the BJCP and BA ?
Marquis,
probably never. Bit too obscure for them. I should get in first and write up some guidelins of my own.
The second brewer at Tetley Walkers in Warrington told me their brewery was the largest ale brewery in the UK in the early nineties and that was pretty much all cask. Do you have any figures for the two breweries?
Cercle,
you're right to call me out on that one, because I don't have a proper source for that claim. It's just something I remember from What's Brewing or the Good Beer Guide.
Figures for output per brewery in the UK aren't that easy to come by. I should know, I hunt these things. Even with those numbers, working out how much cask was brewed wouldn't be easy, unless the brewery itself kept track and the records are preserved.
Tetley in Leeds must have been well up there as well. They brewed a lot of cask beer.
Production figures for a lot of breweries appear in 'The Brewers Handbook' produced by the Brewers Guardian. Don't know how long it's been around though.
What exactly do you mean by Old Ale?
Ed,
any idea where I could get hold of a copy of 'The Brewers Handbook'?
Thom,
in this period I'd expect an Old Ale in the West Midlands to have been like a strong Dark Mild.
I have got a bottle m b strong ale
Hi Ron,
Reference M&B Strong Ale, I have an unopened bottle which dates from the mid late 30s I believe. Somewhere I've got the cheque which paid for it, probably as a case, the amount being pounds rather than pence.
There is unusual text around the edge of the label although it's only partially legible due to damage and wear. It reads - "??? are vessels to carry beer not ???".
Is there any viability in removing some of the contents to ascertain the constituents with a view to 're-brewing' the product. Presumably given its high ABV with potential 'maturing' in the bottle (a la Thomas Hardy's) it may be possible to do so.
I have tried to attach pics but it didn't want to work. If you can give me an alternative contact I'll send them. Afraid I'm not on Twatter or Farce book.
Cheers
Stuart Brighton
Hi Stuart,
it probably says something like this: "The company's bottles are vessels to carry beer and are not measures". It was pretty standard text on labels before WW II.
It might be possible to remove some of the contents and have them analyse, though I'm not an epxert on doing that sort of thing.
Under "Get in Touch" in the left column of my blog you can send me an email through a Blogger gadget.
Post a Comment