A few general observations to begin. These grists look very 20th century. Around 15% sugar in most of the beers and crystal malt in a few. The number of different sugars used - there are at least two in every beer - is also very typical. Particularly the use of proprietary sugars like DL and Dmax in addition to numbered invert sugars.
It's indicative of the complex way sugars were used after 1900 to affect flavour, body and colour. British brewers were masters of sugar use. Though, of course, there are still idiots who think it's the work of the devil* and that beer should be all malt.
Let's begin with the Pale Ales: the AK variations and PA. These were around 80% pale malt, 15% sugar and 4% flaked maize. Pretty typical, really. For newcomers, I'll repeat that crystal malt didn't become common in Pale Ale grist until several decades later. The "sacc." in the ones from the 10th February is almost certainly No. 2 invert noted down a different way.
Now for the Milds and Strong Ale. I've been talking about colour a lot recently and when these types of beer began their long march to darkness. Eldridge Pope's had clearly started that journey, judging by the No.3 invert and caramel they contained. But I suspect they were still dark amber rather than the dark brown associated with Mild today.
Odd that the Strong Ale contains crystal malt. 19th-century advertisements for crystal malt usually advised its use for adding body and sweetness to Mild Ales. I wouldn't have expected a beer with as high a gravity as XXXX to have needed any help in that department.
And finally, the Stouts. The main point of interest here is the presence of oats in the grist. Quite a large amount, at 7-12% of the total. I assume this is because they were marketing one as Oatmeal Stout, which was all the rage at the time. Plus it was also a (relatively) cheap adjunct, which might explain why they didn't bother with any maize in the Stouts.
Significantly, there's no longer any brown malt in the Stout grists. Not such a surprise, but it's still sad to see it go. I've a lot of irrational affection for brown malt. I'm not sure what Dmax is, other than a proprietary sugar but, judging by its use in just the Stouts, it's probably dark.
That's me done. All that's left is the table itself.
Eldridge Pope grists 1911 - 1912 | ||||||||||||||||||
Date | Year | Beer | Style | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | pale malt | black malt | crystal malt | no. 2 sugar | no. 3 sugar | caramel | sacc | DL | Dmax | oats | flaked maize |
10th Feb | 1911 | Sp AK | Pale Ale | 1040.2 | 1011.1 | 3.85 | 72.41% | 79.25% | 11.32% | 5.66% | 3.77% | |||||||
10th Feb | 1911 | BAK | Pale Ale | 1044.3 | 1012.7 | 4.18 | 71.25% | 79.25% | 11.32% | 5.66% | 3.77% | |||||||
10th Feb | 1911 | AK | Pale Ale | 1042.7 | 1011.1 | 4.18 | 74.03% | 79.25% | 11.32% | 5.66% | 3.77% | |||||||
15th Feb | 1911 | XXXX | Strong Ale | 1076.2 | 1024.4 | 6.85 | 68.00% | 85.37% | 4.88% | 9.76% | ||||||||
16th Feb | 1911 | S | Stout | 1059.3 | 1018.0 | 5.46 | 69.63% | 60.00% | 6.15% | 9.23% | 2.05% | 10.26% | 12.31% | |||||
16th Feb | 1911 | Light Tonic Stout | Stout | 1047.4 | 1014.7 | 4.32 | 69.01% | 60.00% | 6.15% | 9.23% | 2.05% | 10.26% | 12.31% | |||||
21st Feb | 1911 | PA | Pale Ale | 1051.2 | 1015.5 | 4.73 | 69.73% | 80.87% | 5.22% | 2.61% | 0.87% | 5.22% | 5.22% | |||||
21st Feb | 1911 | XXX | Mild | 1058.2 | 1017.2 | 5.42 | 70.48% | 80.87% | 5.22% | 2.61% | 0.87% | 5.22% | 5.22% | |||||
21st Feb | 1911 | X | Mild | 1036.0 | 1009.1 | 3.55 | 74.62% | 80.87% | 5.22% | 2.61% | 0.87% | 5.22% | 5.22% | |||||
6th Jun | 1912 | S | Stout | 1059.3 | 1019.1 | 5.31 | 67.76% | 65.45% | 6.82% | 8.18% | 1.82% | 10.91% | 6.82% | |||||
6th Jun | 1912 | Light Tonic Stout | Stout | 1047.4 | 1014.7 | 4.32 | 69.01% | 65.45% | 6.82% | 8.18% | 1.82% | 10.91% | 6.82% | |||||
23rd Aug | 1912 | BAK | Pale Ale | 1044.3 | 1013.3 | 4.10 | 70.00% | 72.83% | 15.03% | 6.94% | 5.20% | |||||||
23rd Aug | 1912 | AK | Pale Ale | 1042.7 | 1012.7 | 3.96 | 70.13% | 77.61% | 11.94% | 5.97% | 4.48% | |||||||
27th Aug | 1912 | PA | Pale Ale | 1051.0 | 1015.2 | 4.73 | 70.11% | 77.19% | 11.70% | 5.85% | 5.26% | |||||||
Source: | ||||||||||||||||||
Eldridge Pope brewing records |
* Ironically, I consider sugar to be the work of the devil everywhere but in brewing. I stopped eating refined sugar in 1972.
8 comments:
I think you are being a bit harsh on the Bavarians.
Any idea on the radical change in amount of oats used in the stouts from 1911 to 1912? Price of oats go up maybe?
Also, interesting that they hit the exact same OGs, despite that change. Pretty good use of sugar there.
Rob, more likely they realised that they could get away with putting in fewer oats.
By the 1930's, the quantities of oats in Oatmeal Stouts was sometimes laughable: less than 0.1% of the grist.
Rob,
It wasn't the Bavarians I had in mind.
Ron,
I know who you meant. But I think the American homebrew/craft attitude towards that comes from the Bavarians, which is interesting since they primarily make British derived beers. Its probably a backlash against the German immigrant brewers who went away from the purity law in making their lagers (for good reason, considering 6-row barley).
When I make a german-style beer, I make sure I find some way to violate the reinheitsgebot. However, my english-style ales are generally all malt.
Rob, the Reinheitsgebot (so-called "purity law)wasn't a German thing until the early 1900s , until then it was entirely a Bavarian thing.
German brewers used a lot of adjuncts, particularly rice, before the imposition of RHG and the German immigrant brewers would have carried this practce with them.
As so much in America, the attitude of early craft brewers was an amalgam: it combined ideas from Germany (Pure Beer Law) with British models such as IPA and barley wine, as mediated in particular through Michael Jackson's writings, since he lauded both strains.
A lot of what you see is the result of specific circumstances and influences...
Gary
Anon,
Im well aware, hence my reference to Bavaria in the 1st post.
Im sure some of the German immigrants were from Bavaria, but no clue how many.
But, this is about attitude, not historical accuracy. The distinction between Bavaria and Germany was lost on many when developing the attitude.
Post a Comment