Each of the four beers contains more than just the base pale malt. Though in the case of County Ale, it’s just enzymic malt. Which I can’t imagine had any impact on the flavour.
Two out of four contain crystal malt. See? Crystal malt wasn’t universally employed in any class of Bitter. I wonder if use of crystal malt was tied to home brewing? If you’re brewing with malt extract, as many home brewers did in the 1970s, steeping crystal malt is a way of adding an extra dimension to your Bitter.
Amber malt, as in Abbey Ale, seems like an odd choice. Especially as it wasn’t a malt which was much used at the time. No wonder the beer turned out so dark.
Who would have expected half the examples to contain wheat? Perhaps someone with knowledge of brewing practices at the time. I always assume its presence is for heading purposes.
What can I say about enzymic malt? Other than that it’s weird how many brewers persisted in using it. Was it really to help conversion?
An average malt content of 82% is fairly high. But that is a little less that the 85% of Best Bitter.
Special Bitter malts 1969 - 1981 | ||||||||
Year | Brewer | Beer | pale malt | crystal malt | amber malt | wheat malt | enzymic malt | total malt |
1971 | Shepherd Neame | Abbey Ale | 61.15% | 5.73% | 5.73% | 3.82% | 76.43% | |
1981 | Eldridge Pope | Royal Oak | 76.57% | 8.67% | 5.98% | 91.23% | ||
1969 | Truman | Ben Truman | 86.67% | 86.67% | ||||
1969 | Fremlin | County Ale | 70.36% | 4.19% | 74.54% | |||
Average | 82.22% | |||||||
Sources: | ||||||||
As in the table above. |
1 comment:
This is not boring Ron it is good debunking of the idea that bitter needs crystal malt.
Oscar
Post a Comment