Why was that? Because temperance twats saw pubs as a terrible temptation to the poor wee lambs of the working class. Who didn't have the moral fibre to resist. Remove the temptation and sobriety would follow. At least, that was the theory. A condescending view of the labouring classes and totally ignoring the vital social function that pubs played.
None of this applied to where the upper classes gathered to drink: posh gentleman's clubs. Which is why for so long working men's clubs remained unaffected by licensing legislation. As the authorities struggled to find a way of imposing the control on workers' clubs while allowing their own to operate unhindered.
Key pieces of legislation regarding pubs were the 1869 and 1872 Licensing Acts, which not only made it very difficult to obtain new licences, but also made it easier for magistrates to revoke existing licences. An unexpected consequence was a big increase in the value of existing licences. Which in turn boosted the tied house system, as brewers rushed to guarantee outlets.
With pub licences a valued asset, brewers were reluctant to close pubs. Instead, they would trade in two or three licences of smaller, inner city pubs, where there was lots of competition, to gain one new licence in a new suburb. Today, with few pubs owned by brewers and new licences easy to obtain, there's no need for owners to hang onto unprofitable pubs. No need to trade licences with licensing magistrates.
You may think a lot of pubs are currently closing. In the first couple of decades of the 20th century it was between 3 and 5 pubs a day that disappeared forever. A fall so great it must have impacted every community in the country.
| Reduction in licences in England and Wales 1905 - 1920 | |||||
| Year ended Dec 31 | Refused with compensation | Refused without compensation | Licences lapsed | New licences granted | Net decrease |
| 1905 | 194 | 80 | 363 | 53 | 584 |
| 1906 | 892 | 69 | 435 | 56 | 1,340 |
| 1907 | 1,735 | 48 | 322 | 68 | 2,037 |
| 1908 | 1,236 | 30 | 253 | 47 | 1,472 |
| 1909 | 1,290 | 35 | 286 | 50 | 1,561 |
| 1910 | 993 | 27 | 250 | 33 | 1,237 |
| 1911 | 978 | 20 | 444 | 44 | 1,398 |
| 1912 | 849 | 18 | 296 | 53 | 1,110 |
| 1913 | 842 | 24 | 265 | 52 | 1,079 |
| 1914 | 844 | 13 | 225 | 48 | 1,034 |
| Totals | 9,853 | 364 | 3,139 | 504 | 12,852 |
| Average 1894 - 1902 | 296 | ||||
| Average 1903 - 1904 | 614 | ||||
| Average 1905 - 1914 | 985 | 36 | 314 | 50 | 1,285 |
| Source: | |||||
| Brewers' Almanack 1922, page 91. | |||||


No comments:
Post a Comment