More shit about London Stout, I'm afraid. This just happens to be what I'm working on at the moment.
Outside London, draught Stout was becoming somewhat of rarity. Even within the capital it was coming under threat. Bottled Stout, on the other hand, remained popular. As is evidenced by the broad range of Stouts of different strengths which were brewed.Many London brewers were still producing multiple Stouts. Forest Hill, for example, had Stouts at 6d, 7d and 8d per pint. While Hoare and Charrington both had 7d and 8d Stouts.
In order to compare prices between draught and bottled beer, a simple rule of thumb is that the latter cost 1d more. So, an 8d per pint bottled Stout is the equivalent of a 7d draught Stout.
As with the draught Stouts, most of the beers fall nicely into the last price control bands with regards to gravity. The 8d bottled Stouts average 1048.7º and the 9d ones 1055.6º. Quite close to the 1046.6º and 1055.2º of draught 7d and 8d Stouts.
You’ll note that there were bottled versions which were much weaker than any draught Stouts. The weakest make a mockery of the term Stout, being under 4% ABV.
There are quite a few Oatmeal Stouts in the table. It’s a type of beer which was very popular at the time. I’ve deliberately included the standard Stout from the same brewery. Just to show that they were likely the same beer, simply labelled differently.
Between the wars bottled London Stout | |||||||
Year | Brewer | Beer | Price | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation |
1926 | Forest Hill Brewery | Stout | 6 | 1033.3 | |||
1928 | Hammerton | V.C.Stout | 6 | 1035.9 | 1006.7 | 3.80 | 81.34% |
1929 | Lovibond | Pioneer Stout | 1032.6 | 1007.3 | 3.28 | 77.61% | |
Average | 1033.9 | 1007.0 | 3.54 | 79.47% | |||
1929 | Charrington | Stout | 7 | 1038 | 1009.4 | 3.71 | 75.26% |
1927 | Forest Hill Brewery | Stout | 7 | 1046.4 | |||
1929 | Hoare | Stout | 7 | 1038 | 1012.4 | 3.31 | 67.37% |
1928 | Isleworth | Stout | 7 | 1040.7 | 1008.3 | 4.21 | 79.61% |
1930 | Taylor Walker | Nourishing Stout | 7 | 1037 | 1008.6 | 3.69 | 76.76% |
Average | 1040.0 | 1009.7 | 3.73 | 74.75% | |||
1930 | Cannon Brewery | Cannon Stout | 8 | 1047 | 1013.2 | 4.38 | 71.91% |
1929 | Charrington | Oatmeal Stout | 8 | 1046 | 1010.1 | 4.67 | 78.04% |
1930 | Charrington | Stout | 8 | 1049 | |||
1930 | Courage | Stout | 8 | 1050.2 | |||
1926 | Forest Hill Brewery | Stout | 8 | 1055 | |||
1928 | Friary Holroyd | Stout | 8 | 1042.6 | |||
1926 | Hammerton | Oatmeal Stout | 8 | 1050.1 | 1015.9 | 4.43 | 68.26% |
1929 | Hammerton | Stout | 8 | 1049 | 1014.6 | 4.46 | 70.20% |
1930 | Hoare | Toby Stout | 8 | 1042 | 1013.6 | 3.67 | 67.62% |
1928 | Hoare & Co | Stout | 8 | 1047.3 | |||
1928 | Mann Crossman | London Stout | 8 | 1050.5 | 1012.2 | 4.98 | 75.84% |
1930 | Meux | Stout | 8 | 1049.2 | |||
1930 | Meux | Oatmeal Stout | 8 | 1050 | 1009.4 | 5.29 | 81.20% |
1928 | Noakes & Co | Stout | 8 | 1055.9 | |||
1926 | Reid | Stout | 8 | 1050.3 | |||
1928 | Truman | Eagle Stout | 8 | 1048.9 | 1009.5 | 5.13 | 80.57% |
1928 | Watney | Reids Oatmeal Stout | 8 | 1050 | 1015.6 | 4.46 | 68.80% |
1928 | Watney | Reids Family Stout | 8 | 1050.2 | 1012.7 | 4.87 | 74.70% |
1930 | Young & Co | Stout | 8 | 1042.01 | |||
Average | 1048.7 | 1012.7 | 4.63 | 73.72% | |||
1928 | Barclay Perkins | Stout | 9 | 1053.9 | 1014.5 | 5.12 | 73.10% |
1929 | Barclay Perkins | Stout | 9 | 1053 | 1015.6 | 4.85 | 70.57% |
1929 | Barclay Perkins | Stout | 9 | 1054 | 1014.8 | 5.09 | 72.59% |
1926 | Whitbread | Stout | 9 | 1057.7 | |||
1928 | Watney | Reids Special Stout | 1056 | 1014.7 | 5.37 | 73.75% | |
1928 | Mann Crossman | Extra Stout | 9 | 1059.9 | 1016.2 | 5.68 | 72.95% |
1927 | Taylor Walker | Special Stout | 10 | 1055 | 1013.7 | 5.37 | 75.09% |
Average | 1055.6 | 1014.9 | 5.25 | 73.01% | |||
Sources: | |||||||
Truman Gravity Book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number B/THB/C/252. | |||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001. |
1 comment:
The Cannon brewery were ahead of their time in terms of naming and branding
Post a Comment