I've accumulated so many photos of brewing records that I mostly only process them when I need them for a book project. I've gone through every single one for WW I and WW II. And most post-WW II ones as well. Because those were the periods I've been writing about in the last couple of years.
I'd not got around to William Younger's 1888 brewing book, despite having written a whole book on Scottish beer. The reason I hadn't bothered was that I'd already done a brewing book from just a few years before, 1885. Others appeared more useful.
Why have I finally become arsed? Because I'm throwing together Strong Ale recipes for a new edition of my book "Strong!". Not wanting to repeat Younger's recipes that were in "Scootland! vol. 2", the simplest way was to use records that I knew I'd never used before.
I'm glad that I could be bothered. Since I found some more weirdness.
William Younger was an odd brewery. They had an immense range of beers, many very similar to each other. For example, in addition to the numbered Strong Ales, they also had a set of strong Shilling Ales.
In the brewing book I've found 29 different beers. Which is way more than most breweries produced. It's not even the full set. As it only includes a couple of Pale Ales and they had far more than that. But that's because the brewing book is from the Abbey Brewery. Their other plant, the Holyrood Brewery, was where most of the Pale Ales were brewed.
William Younger beers in 1888 | ||
Beer | Style | OG |
1 | Strong Ale | 1105.0 |
2 | Strong Ale | 1091.0 |
3 | Strong Ale | 1081.0 |
100/- | Ale | 1080.0 |
120/- | Ale | 1090.0 |
140/- | Ale | 1106.0 |
160/- | Ale | 1118.0 |
3 Sp | Strong Ale | 1081.0 |
3 Stg | Strong Ale | 1101.0 |
3 Wk | Strong Ale | 1061.0 |
50/- | Ale | 1038.0 |
60/- | Ale | 1053.0 |
80/- | Ale | 1068.0 |
DBS | Stout | 1076.0 |
H 60/- | Ale | 1047.0 |
P | Pale Ale | 1051.0 |
S Ext | Pale Ale | 1071.0 |
S1 | Stout | 1078.0 |
S1 Sp | Stout | 1076.0 |
S2 | Stout | 1068.0 |
S3 | Stout | 1055.0 |
Special S1 Hong Kong | Stout | 1077.0 |
T | Table Beer | 1032.0 |
T | Table Beer | 1034.0 |
X | Mild | 1063.0 |
XP | Pale Ale | 1057.0 |
XPS | Pale Ale | 1057.0 |
XX | Mild | 1061.0 |
XXX | Mild | 1071.0 |
Source: | ||
William Younger brewing record held at the Scottish Brewing Archive, document number WY/6/1/2/34. |
What's the weirdness, then? I hear you ask. With No. 3. They brewed a standard a strong and a weak version. The strong one being just about as strong as No. 1. So why not just brew No.1? I really can't see the point. As for the weaker one, why not simply call it No. 4? A beer which they had brewed at one point.
William Younger numbered Strong Ales in 1888 | |||||||
Beer | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl | dry hops (oz / barrel) |
1 | 1106.0 | 1038.0 | 9.00 | 64.15% | 22.73 | 11.73 | 14.08 |
3 Strong | 1101.0 | 1033.0 | 9.00 | 67.33% | 12.80 | 6.30 | 19.78 |
2 | 1091.0 | 1035.0 | 7.41 | 61.54% | 9.4 | 4.17 | 10.00 |
3 Sp | 1081.0 | 1022.0 | 7.81 | 72.84% | 12.43 | 4.59 | 0.00 |
3 | 1080.0 | 1030.0 | 6.61 | 62.50% | 10.50 | 3.91 | 9.38 |
3 Weak | 1061.0 | 1018.0 | 5.69 | 70.49% | 8.17 | 2.11 | 0.00 |
Source: | |||||||
William Younger brewing record held at the Scottish Brewing Archive, document number WY/6/1/2/34. |
2 comments:
Were the different #3's labelled as such, or you just found #3's that were stronger and weaker? Maybe for blending into batches that went wrong? Or different tax regimes?
Hi qq,
I'd have said probably for both blending and different target markets
Cheers
Edd
Post a Comment