The first thing that should strike you is how incredibly variable the hop harvest was. The difference between consecutive years could be enormous. The years 1800 to 1806 demonstrate these annual variations well. Hops are delicate plants, susceptible to the weather, pests and disease. Slight changes in conditions could have a huge impact on the crop.
In a recent post, Martyn Cortnell mentioned the incredibly poor summer of 1816 (caused by a vlocanic explosion in Asia) that led to a disatrous hop crop. But as you can see below, it was by no means the worst harvest, even in the same decade. 1802, 1805, 1812, 1823, 1825, 1829, 1840 and 1854 were all worse.
Unsurprisingly, the price went up and down with the harvest. In years of a good harvest, the price was between £4 and £7 per cwt. In poor years it could be almost £20 a cwt. Though when a poor harvest followed a bumper one, as in 1808 and 1809, old stock from the previous year kept the price low.
In the 1850's, imports began to pick up the slack when the British harvest was poor. Doubtless the price in 1854 would have been higher, save for the huge amount of hops that were imported.
It's easy to understand why the more far-sighted brewers bought in extra stocks during the good years. Trying to plan ahead must have been a nightmare when the price could vary by 200% or 300% from one year to the next.
When the import duty on hops was removed in 1862 in must have been a great relief to brewers. They were then free to buy their hops from anywhere in the world, which is exactly what they did and imports of hops remained hight until WW I.
UK hop production, price and imports 1800 - 1854 | |||||||
year | UK production lbs | London price per cwt. £ s. d. | imports lbs | year | UK production lbs | London price cwt. £ s. d. | imports lbs |
1800 | 17,502,867 | 17 17 0 | 1828 | 41,286,692 | 5 12 0 | ||
1801 | 57,894,646 | 5 18 0 | 1829 | 9,568,981 | 8 8 0 | 4,591 | |
1802 | 3,711,326 | 10 12 0 | 1830 | 21,131,442 | 12 8 0 | ||
1803 | 47,809,230 | 6 6 0 | 1831 | 41,971,222 | 5 18 0 | ||
1804 | 42,628,269 | 5 5 0 | 1832 | 33,364,403 | 8 13 0 | ||
1805 | 7,897,208 | 8 0 0 | 1833 | 37,657,340 | 7 4 0 | ||
1806 | 36,744,810 | 7 0 0 | 1834 | 45,531,402 | 6 3 0 | ||
1807 | 24,017,342 | 5 10 0 | 1835 | 56,449,732 | 4 15 0 | ||
1808 | 60,261,667 | 5 18 0 | 1836 | 48,079,932 | 5 0 0 | ||
1809 | 15,348,842 | 4 4 0 | 1837 | 42,858,781 | 5 1 6 | ||
1810 | 17,643,490 | 6 0 0 | 1838 | 41,173,471 | 5 17 0 | ||
1811 | 37,700,783 | 6 6 0 | 1839 | 49,333,588 | 4 10 0 | 2,840 | |
1812 | 7,335,023 | 13 8 0 | 1840 | 8,182,162 | 13 11 0 | 11,984 | |
1813 | 31,555,863 | 8 8 0 | 1841 | 35,078,187 | 6 6 0 | 3,808 | |
1814 | 33,670,202 | 8 8 0 | 1842 | 40,746,360 | 4 8 10 | 0 | |
1815 | 29,731,043 | 7 10 0 | 1843 | 32,023,661 | 6 0 9 | 3,136 | |
1816 | 11,112,589 | 13 13 0 | 1844 | 33,677,623 | 7 3 0 | 29,904 | |
1817 | 15,965,326 | 27 0 0 | 1845 | 37,922,262 | 6 10 0 | 81,312 | |
1818 | 47,871,867 | 7 0 0 | 1846 | 50,704,025 | 5 0 0 | 367,696 | |
1819 | 58,098,282 | 4 8 0 | 1847 | 45,134,365 | 3 10 0 | 164,752 | |
1820 | 33,199,386 | 4 4 0 | 1848 | 44,343,985 | 2 15 0 | 43,120 | |
1821 | 37,106,369 | 4 15 0 | 1849 | 16,650,915 | 7 10 0 | 43,118 | |
1822 | 48,894,050 | 4 4 0 | 1850 | 48,537,669 | 3 10 0 | 725,648 | |
1823 | 6,253,909 | 13 0 0 | 1851 | 27,042,996 | 6 10 0 | 51,744 | |
1824 | 35,719,681 | 7 0 0 | 1852 | 51,102,494 | 4 5 0 | 34,608 | |
1825 | 5,836,092 | 19 0 0 | 1853 | 31,751,693 | 11 11 0 | 4,742,528 | |
1826 | 64,759,450 | 5 0 0 | 1854 | 9,877,126 | 20 0 0 | 13,330,480 | |
1827 | 33,803,643 | 5 0 0 | |||||
Sources: | |||||||
"A Practical Treatise on Malting and Brewing" by William Ford, 1862, pages 288 - 290. | |||||||
"Hops; their Cultivation, Commerce, and Uses in Various Countries" by P.L., Simmonds, 1877, page 129. | |||||||
Note: | |||||||
Production 1800-1845 caculated from hop duty paid. |
2 comments:
Tell 'em about the gambling Ron.
Ed,
I almost forgot about that. Didn't Martyn do a post on it?
Post a Comment