They aren't brewing records, but an overview of the quantity of Lager brewed and the materials used. They still contain plenty of useful information such as OG, hopping rate and grist. Plus they give an idea of how much Lager Tennent were brewing.
The records cover 1889-1890 and in the 6 months that they cover, Tennent brewed 2,418 barrels of Lager. Assuming that they brewed a similar amount every month of the year, that comes to an annual output of 4,836 barrels. Or bugger all. Large London brewers had single batches of Mild Ale of more than 1,000 barrels. Though this is before Tennent's shiny new Lager brewery first brewed in 1891. Presumably they upped production a bit then.
Let's move on to the beer itself. Its gravity was around 1056º, about dead on average for the period. And a couple of points below a contemporary London X Ale. It's odd they way they changed the grist a few times: occasionally brewing it all malt, but mostly with about 25% maize. Though there were single brews that used either rice or sugar.
Tennent's Lager 1889 - 1890 | ||||||||||||
Date | Year | Brewer | Beer | OG | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl | barrels | lbs hops | total qtrs | qtrs malt | flaked maize | flaked rice |
31st Oct | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1053.0 | 4.62 | 1.25 | 48 | 60 | 13 | 13 | ||
7th Nov | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1054.0 | 4.62 | 1.18 | 102 | 120 | 26 | 26 | ||
14th Nov | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1057.0 | 4.50 | 1.20 | 100 | 120 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
21st Nov | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1060.0 | 4.50 | 1.20 | 100 | 120 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
28th Nov | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1058.0 | 4.50 | 1.13 | 106 | 120 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
5th Dec | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1057.0 | 4.50 | 1.12 | 107 | 120 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
12th Dec | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1055.0 | 4.50 | 1.07 | 112 | 120 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
19th Dec | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1056.0 | 4.87 | 1.16 | 112 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
4th Jan | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1056.0 | 4.87 | 1.18 | 110 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
8th Jan | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1056.0 | 4.87 | 1.17 | 111 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
16th Jan | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1056.0 | 4.87 | 1.20 | 108 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
22nd Jan | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1055.0 | 4.87 | 1.13 | 115 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
29th Jan | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1056.0 | 4.87 | 1.14 | 114 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
6th Feb | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1055.0 | 4.87 | 1.13 | 115 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
13th Feb | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1055.0 | 4.87 | 1.14 | 114 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
27th Feb | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1054.0 | 4.87 | 1.10 | 118 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
15th Mar | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1055.0 | 4.87 | 1.13 | 115 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
20th Mar | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1056.0 | 4.87 | 1.13 | 115 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
28th Mar | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1055.0 | 4.87 | 1.13 | 115 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
3rd Apr | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1054.0 | 4.91 | 1.12 | 116 | 130 | 26.5 | 26.5 | ||
10th Apr | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1053.0 | 4.87 | 1.10 | 118 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
17th Apr | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1053.0 | 4.87 | 1.08 | 120 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
1st May | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1054.0 | 4.87 | 1.06 | 123 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
8th May | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1053.0 | 4.87 | 1.09 | 119 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
15th May | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1054.0 | 4.91 | 1.13 | 115 | 130 | 26.5 | 26.5 | ||
29th May | 1888 | Tennent | Lager Beer | 1055.0 | 4.87 | 1.10 | 118 | 130 | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | |
Source: | ||||||||||||
Record held at the Scottish Brewing Archive |
The hopping rate is very low, way lower than even for Mild. Here's a table to show how it compares with London beers of the same period:
London beers 1889 - 1891 | ||||||||||
Date | Year | Brewer | Beer | Style | OG | FG | ABV | App. Attenuation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl |
7th Oct | 1891 | Barclay Perkins | BS | Stout | 1077.0 | 1027.0 | 6.61 | 64.94% | 8.56 | 2.98 |
19th Feb | 1891 | Barclay Perkins | KK | Stock Ale | 1075.0 | 1020.2 | 7.25 | 73.04% | 15.17 | 4.91 |
11th Mar | 1891 | Barclay Perkins | KKK | Stock Ale | 1085.0 | 1021.6 | 8.39 | 74.58% | 14.75 | 5.43 |
10th Jun | 1890 | Barclay Perkins | X | Mild | 1058.0 | 1015.5 | 5.62 | 73.26% | 7.92 | 1.98 |
8th Jan | 1890 | Whitbread | 2KKK | Stock Ale | 1075.3 | 1025.0 | 6.66 | 66.82% | 14.29 | 4.90 |
10th Jan | 1890 | Whitbread | 2PA | Pale Ale | 1054.6 | 1011.0 | 5.76 | 79.84% | 10.79 | 2.78 |
28th Oct | 1889 | Whitbread | FA | Pale Ale | 1052.4 | 1008.0 | 5.87 | 84.72% | 10.17 | 2.65 |
21st Oct | 1889 | Whitbread | KK | Stock Ale | 1074.5 | 1020.0 | 7.21 | 73.16% | 12.12 | 4.25 |
1st Nov | 1889 | Whitbread | KKK | Stock Ale | 1086.4 | 1028.0 | 7.73 | 67.60% | 14.00 | 5.87 |
23rd Oct | 1889 | Whitbread | PA | Pale Ale | 1060.4 | 1012.0 | 6.40 | 80.13% | 11.05 | 3.19 |
11th Oct | 1889 | Whitbread | X | Mild | 1060.1 | 1016.0 | 5.84 | 73.38% | 7.02 | 1.94 |
10th Oct | 1889 | Whitbread | XK | Mild | 1066.8 | 1018.0 | 6.45 | 73.04% | 6.99 | 2.23 |
12th Feb | 1889 | Whitbread | P | Porter | 1057.1 | 1015.0 | 5.57 | 73.79% | 8.04 | 2.00 |
29th Jan | 1890 | Whitbread | SS | Stout | 1083.1 | 1025.0 | 7.69 | 69.92% | 10.63 | 4.76 |
29th Jan | 1890 | Whitbread | SSS | Stout | 1095.6 | 1037.0 | 7.75 | 61.28% | 10.63 | 5.47 |
Sources: | ||||||||||
Barclay Perkins brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives document number ACC/2305/1/586 | ||||||||||
Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives document numbers LMA/4453/D/01/055, LMA/4453/D/09/083, LMA/4453/D/09/084 |
In multiple 19th-century sources I'd read how much more lightly hopped Lager was than British beers. This confirms that. Tennent's Lager had about half as many hops per barrel as even running beer.
3 comments:
looks like they took an American approach to lager brewing that a continental ie using flaked maize?
Oblivious, I know - the Germans (other than Bavarians) would have used rice rather than maize.
I've done some research on late 19th century American lagers. Rice was the preferred adjunct grain for premium beers until dry milling of maize was perfected around 100 years ago, and the oily (and potentially rancid) germ could be removed. Then maize gained far more acceptance since it was cheaper.
Normally in the US, grits were used rather than flakes. They were cheaper but required separate cooking.
After I wrote an article about American lagers of this time, which I called Classic American Pilsner, in Brewing Techniques in 1995, this style has gained popularity among homebrewers around the world.
http://brewingtechniques.com/library/backissues/issue3.5/renner.html
Another article by me on the subject in Zymurgy (pdf)
http://www.homebrewersassociation.org/attachments/0000/1298/SOzym00-Pilsner.pdf
Post a Comment