Friday, 12 June 2020
New book proof
The proof copy of my latest book, "Can we stay longer?"
I must say that it's looking dead cool. And it's in colour. One of my best, I think. Though I doubt I'll seel many copies. Or any, based on past experience.
Buy your copy now.
I must say that it's looking dead cool. And it's in colour. One of my best, I think. Though I doubt I'll seel many copies. Or any, based on past experience.
Buy your copy now.
A film about the Velkepopovice brewery in the 1920s
This is one of the most detailed films I've seen about brewing from this sort of period. Absolute gold.
Some really cool stuff in there. Especially the bit about adding 4% Kräusen to the "kvasnicové pivo" (yeast beer). then showing exactly how the Kräusen was added to the cask before it was filled. Then saying that the beer had to rest in the pub for 10 days before serving.
Add to that showing how they pitched the lagering vessels and you've got some great stuff.
Some really cool stuff in there. Especially the bit about adding 4% Kräusen to the "kvasnicové pivo" (yeast beer). then showing exactly how the Kräusen was added to the cask before it was filled. Then saying that the beer had to rest in the pub for 10 days before serving.
Add to that showing how they pitched the lagering vessels and you've got some great stuff.
Northern bottled Pale Ale after WW II
Bitter had kicked off the war generally weaker in the rest of England than in London. But, just like WW I, WW II tended to iron out regional differences.
I’ve so much data for the post-war period that this section is going to be vert table-heavy. Though it is mostly for bottled Pale Ales rather than draught ones. Which is a bit of a shame. But it reflects who was responsible for collecting the samples: Whitbread. While they sampled plenty of draught Pale Ales from London and its environs, from breweries further away they mostly only analysed bottled beers.
These examples are a bit stronger than those from London. There’a a simple explanation: they’re from a few years later when gravities had bounced back a little. The average of 1036.4º is very close to overall average OG, which was around 1037º for the whole of the 1950s.
As in London, the rate of attenuation is high, averaging over 80%.
Some stronger Pale Ales were brewed in the North, too:
A couple would have been considered pretty strong even before WW II. I suspect that the John Smith beer was for export. I know that they shipped beer to Belgium and the lack of a price was often a sign of a beer which wasn’t sold in the UK.
I’ve so much data for the post-war period that this section is going to be vert table-heavy. Though it is mostly for bottled Pale Ales rather than draught ones. Which is a bit of a shame. But it reflects who was responsible for collecting the samples: Whitbread. While they sampled plenty of draught Pale Ales from London and its environs, from breweries further away they mostly only analysed bottled beers.
These examples are a bit stronger than those from London. There’a a simple explanation: they’re from a few years later when gravities had bounced back a little. The average of 1036.4º is very close to overall average OG, which was around 1037º for the whole of the 1950s.
As in London, the rate of attenuation is high, averaging over 80%.
Some stronger Pale Ales were brewed in the North, too:
Northern strong bottled Pale Ale after WW II | ||||||||
Year | Brewer | Beer | Price per pint (d) | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | colour |
1955 | Hewitt Bros. | Pale Ale | 23 | 1040.8 | 1008.4 | 4.21 | 79.41% | 28 |
1953 | Westoe | Export | 30 | 1042.2 | 1008.3 | 4.41 | 80.33% | 23 |
1953 | Duttons | Special | 28 | 1045 | 1007.2 | 4.93 | 84.00% | 28 |
1953 | Vaux | Special Export Pale Ale | 30 | 1046.9 | 1010.4 | 4.75 | 77.83% | 30 |
1951 | John Smith | Magnet Ale | 26 | 1047.1 | 1011.5 | 4.62 | 75.58% | 24 |
1948 | Duncan Gilmour | Export Quality Golden PA | 1053.1 | 1011.8 | 5.38 | 77.78% | 21 | |
1951 | John Smith | Pale Ale | 1059.4 | 1016.9 | 5.52 | 71.55% | 22 | |
Average | 27.4 | 1047.8 | 1010.6 | 4.8 | 78.07% | 25.1 | ||
Source: | ||||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/002. |
A couple would have been considered pretty strong even before WW II. I suspect that the John Smith beer was for export. I know that they shipped beer to Belgium and the lack of a price was often a sign of a beer which wasn’t sold in the UK.
Northern bottled Pale Ale after WW II | ||||||||
Year | Brewer | Beer | Price per pint (d) | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | colour |
1955 | Samuel Smith | Taddy Ale | 22 | 1032.6 | 1007.2 | 3.30 | 77.91% | 23 |
1955 | Catterall & Swarbrick | XL Pale Ale | 22 | 1034.1 | 1005.1 | 3.77 | 85.04% | 19 |
1955 | Moors & Robson | Pale Ale | 16 | 1034.1 | 1007.3 | 3.48 | 78.59% | 14 |
1950 | T Taylor | Special Pale Ale | 28 | 1034.7 | 1008.3 | 3.42 | 76.08% | 24 |
1955 | Thwaites | Pale Ale | 27 | 1034.7 | 1005.5 | 3.80 | 84.15% | 17 |
1955 | Hydes | Pale Ale | 21 | 1034.9 | 1004 | 4.03 | 88.54% | 23 |
1955 | Newcastle Breweries | Amber Ale | 20 | 1034.9 | 1007.5 | 3.56 | 78.51% | 30 |
1951 | Peter Walker | SB Ale | 19 | 1035.1 | 1005.7 | 3.82 | 83.76% | 28 |
1955 | Tennant Bros. | Lion Pale Ale | 27 | 1036.6 | 1009.9 | 3.46 | 72.95% | 23 |
1955 | Tetley | Bitter | 25 | 1037.1 | 1004 | 4.32 | 89.22% | 23 |
1955 | Birkenhead Brewery | India Pale Ale | 21 | 1037.2 | 1007.2 | 3.90 | 80.65% | 21 |
1955 | Threlfalls | Blue Label | 22 | 1037.4 | 1008 | 3.82 | 78.61% | 19 |
1948 | Carlisle State Brewery | Pale Ale | 20 | 1037.5 | 1006.5 | 4.03 | 82.67% | 17.5 |
1955 | Hey & Son | Gold Cup Ale | 25 | 1037.6 | 1006.6 | 4.03 | 82.45% | 19 |
1955 | Moors & Robson | Red Cap Bitter Beer | 20 | 1038.1 | 1008.1 | 3.90 | 78.74% | 15 |
1951 | Peter Walker | Pale Ale | 21 | 1038.5 | 1007.3 | 4.06 | 81.04% | 24 |
1953 | Duttons | DPA Pale Ale | 24 | 1038.9 | 1005.2 | 4.39 | 86.63% | 20 |
1955 | Greenall Whitley | Pale Ale | 22 | 1039.1 | 1008.1 | 4.03 | 79.28% | 20 |
1950 | Tennant Bros. | Pale Ale | 1039.4 | 1012.2 | 3.52 | 69.04% | 27 | |
Average | 22.3 | 1036.4 | 1007.0 | 3.82 | 80.73% | 21.6 | ||
Source: | ||||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/002. |
Thursday, 11 June 2020
19th-century Scottish Stock Ale
As in England these were essentially aged versions of Mild Ale. One of the unusual features of Scottish brewing is the large number of very strong beers which were sold young. A much lower percentage of strong Scottish beers were aged.
Being expected to last for years, Stock Ales were hopped more heavily than the equivalent Shilling Ale. S and XS were the Stock equivalents of 100/- and 120/-, respectively, the main difference being that they contained double the amount of hops.
There’s some overlap between the higher value Shilling Ales and Stock Ales. Half of the batch of 1868 XXS below, for example, was packaged as 140/-. As these stronger Shilling Ales were already heavily hopped, there was no real difference with the Stock Ale recipe. Presumably the only difference was how quickly the beer was sold.
The hopping rate declined over time, though, admittedly, it did start at a ridiculously high level. Even in 1868, with 3 lbs or more per barrel, they weren’t lightly hopped beers.
The above is an excerpt from my excellent book on Scottish brewing:
Which is also available in Kindle form:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07Q8XHBL2
Being expected to last for years, Stock Ales were hopped more heavily than the equivalent Shilling Ale. S and XS were the Stock equivalents of 100/- and 120/-, respectively, the main difference being that they contained double the amount of hops.
There’s some overlap between the higher value Shilling Ales and Stock Ales. Half of the batch of 1868 XXS below, for example, was packaged as 140/-. As these stronger Shilling Ales were already heavily hopped, there was no real difference with the Stock Ale recipe. Presumably the only difference was how quickly the beer was sold.
The hopping rate declined over time, though, admittedly, it did start at a ridiculously high level. Even in 1868, with 3 lbs or more per barrel, they weren’t lightly hopped beers.
William Younger Stock Ales in 1849 | ||||||||
Date | Year | Beer | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl |
7th Apr | 1849 | S | 1097 | 1031 | 8.73 | 68.04% | 12.00 | 4.92 |
13th Nov | 1849 | S | 1095 | 1028 | 8.86 | 70.53% | 10.31 | 4.85 |
12th Nov | 1849 | XS | 1108 | 1036 | 9.53 | 66.67% | 11.50 | 6.73 |
Source: | ||||||||
William Younger brewing record held at the Scottish Brewing Archive, document number WY/6/1/2/3. |
William Younger Stock Ales 1851 - 1868 | |||||||
Year | Beer | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl |
1851 | S | 1098 | 1027 | 9.39 | 72.45% | 12.90 | 6.35 |
1851 | XS | 1109 | 1036 | 9.66 | 66.97% | 11.61 | 9.00 |
1851 | XXS | 1126 | 1052 | 9.79 | 58.73% | 12.00 | 9.00 |
1858 | XS | 1102 | 1032 | 9.26 | 68.63% | 10.00 | 6.27 |
1858 | XXS | 1113 | 1036 | 10.19 | 68.14% | 9.76 | 6.25 |
1859 | XXXS | 1128 | 1053 | 9.92 | 58.59% | 9.78 | 7.26 |
1869 | XXXX | 1089 | 1021 | 9.00 | 76.40% | 11.67 | 5.76 |
1868 | S | 1077 | 1032 | 5.95 | 58.44% | 6.86 | 2.79 |
1868 | XS Export | 1092 | 1033 | 7.81 | 64.13% | 6.82 | 3.70 |
1868 | XXS | 1102 | 1045 | 7.54 | 55.88% | 4.91 | 3.25 |
1868 | XXXS | 1129 | 1066 | 8.33 | 48.84% | 7.60 | 6.33 |
Sources: | |||||||
William Younger brewing records held at the Scottish Brewing Archive, document numbers WY/6/1/2/5, WY/6/1/2/14 and WY/6/1/2/21. |
The above is an excerpt from my excellent book on Scottish brewing:
Which is also available in Kindle form:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07Q8XHBL2
Wednesday, 10 June 2020
Let's Brew Wednesday - 1939 Barclay Perkins Sparkling Beer
Here's a treat for you - another wartime British Lager.
Though you may already have drunk this beer. If you attended the historic Lager festival at Urban Chestnut in St. Louis a couple of years ago. It was one of the recipes I provided. The beer went down surprisingly well.
First appearing just before WW II, Sparkling Beer was a strange beast. Brewed as a Lager, but nothing about its branding revealed that fact. Which is a bit strange.
As it doesn’t appear on any UK Barclay Perkins price lists, I’m pretty sure it was never sold domestically. Rather, it seems to have been designed as a long-life beer for ships’ stores, export and the military. Which is probably why it was often in canned form.
Amber in colour, a style Nazi would probably pin it down as a Vienna Lager. But I don’t think that was the brewery’s aim. Guessing what their aim might have been is another matter.
The grist is an odd mix of lager and crystal malt. With quite a lot of Saaz hops. It’s not very complicated, but doesn’t look much like either a UK of a continental beer. The Saaz were from the 1937 and 1938 harvests, both kept in a cold store.
A strange beer, which one that lived on quite a while after Barclay’s original London Lager brands disappeared.
Though you may already have drunk this beer. If you attended the historic Lager festival at Urban Chestnut in St. Louis a couple of years ago. It was one of the recipes I provided. The beer went down surprisingly well.
First appearing just before WW II, Sparkling Beer was a strange beast. Brewed as a Lager, but nothing about its branding revealed that fact. Which is a bit strange.
As it doesn’t appear on any UK Barclay Perkins price lists, I’m pretty sure it was never sold domestically. Rather, it seems to have been designed as a long-life beer for ships’ stores, export and the military. Which is probably why it was often in canned form.
Amber in colour, a style Nazi would probably pin it down as a Vienna Lager. But I don’t think that was the brewery’s aim. Guessing what their aim might have been is another matter.
The grist is an odd mix of lager and crystal malt. With quite a lot of Saaz hops. It’s not very complicated, but doesn’t look much like either a UK of a continental beer. The Saaz were from the 1937 and 1938 harvests, both kept in a cold store.
A strange beer, which one that lived on quite a while after Barclay’s original London Lager brands disappeared.
1939 Barclay Perkins Sparkling Beer | ||
lager malt | 9.50 lb | 88.37% |
crystal malt 80 L | 1.25 lb | 11.63% |
Saaz 90 min | 1.25 oz | |
Saaz 60 min | 1.25 oz | |
Saaz 30 min | 1.25 oz | |
OG | 1048 | |
FG | 1014 | |
ABV | 4.50 | |
Apparent attenuation | 70.83% | |
IBU | 39 | |
SRM | 10 | |
Mash at | 158º F | |
Sparge at | 175º F | |
Boil time | 90 minutes | |
pitching temp | 45º F | |
Yeast | Wyeast 2042 Danish lager |
Labels:
1930s,
barclay perkins,
beer recipes,
British lager,
lager,
Let's Brew,
London,
WW I
Tuesday, 9 June 2020
Malzbier between the wars (part two)
Time for more watery Malzbier fun with Schönfel. Though this time there are some of almost normal strength.
That's odd with the harvest beer. In the UK, beer intended for harvesters was weaker than standard beer, as it was intended to refresh rather than intoxicate.
Here are a few beers of these types:
You'll see that some of the beers are stronger than Schönfeld writes. Five of the beers in the table have an OG of over 14º Balling. Some are also pretty sour.
"In addition to them, there were a number of stronger beers, mostly with 7-9% and sometimes also with 10-12% E. gravity, which soon bore this, now that name, and to which the multiple wheat malt beers (beers made from barley and wheat malt), Hannoversch Broihan (also a wheat malt beer of 7-9% gravity flavored with cloves, cinnamon, anise, etc.), Werdersches Bier, the Braunbier of the Kretschmer breweries in Breslau, the beers produced in East and West Prussia, and many others. They were all poorly attenuatted and mostly deeply dark in color. Some agricultural areas were offered a so-called harvest beer in the summer, which was brewed strong and well-hopped.None of that sounds very Reinheitsgebot-compliant. I can't remember coming across Broyhan having so many spices added to it before. Though I know that spices were used to flavour beer. Even in Bavaria, where for a while coriander was allowed.
Mostly made from pure barley malt, but often with the addition of sugar, which could account for up to 20% of the mash material, they were more or less characterized by a mild and malty-sweet taste."
"Obergärige Biere und ihre Herstellung" by Dr. Franz Schönfeld, 2nd edition, Verlag von Paul Parey, Berlin, 1938, page 133 - 134.
That's odd with the harvest beer. In the UK, beer intended for harvesters was weaker than standard beer, as it was intended to refresh rather than intoxicate.
"The fermentation took place either in vats or in barrels, from one-ton pieces up to casks of 6-7 tons.Barrel fermentation sound rather like a ponto: having the barrel at an angle tso excess yeast could be discharged and refilling with fresh wort.
The fermentation period was finished in 2-3 days at the usual temperature of 15-18 ° C.
For barrel fermentation, especially when using small barrels, slightly higher temperatures (20-22 ° C) were advantageously chosen, so that the yeast could be better discharged.
The barrels lying at an angle during the main fermentation were straightened after the yeast growth had ended and, with constant refilling and keeping it full up to the the bung, left to rest for 1-2 days for a short fermentation and 8-10 days for a longer fermentation."
"Obergärige Biere und ihre Herstellung" by Dr. Franz Schönfeld, 2nd edition, Verlag von Paul Parey, Berlin, 1938, page 134.
Here are a few beers of these types:
Broyhan and Braunbier 1850 - 1890 | ||||||||
Year | Brewer | Beer | Style | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | pH |
1884 | Hannover, Städtisch | Einfacher Broyhan | Broyhan | 1031.4 | 1022.5 | 1.03 | 27.67% | 3.78 |
1884 | Hannover, Städtisch | Doppelter Broyhan | Broyhan | 1053.4 | 1043.6 | 1.20 | 17.55% | 3.99 |
1850 | Unknown, Halberstadt | Halberstädter Breyhan | Breyhan | 1034.7 | 1012.7 | 2.84 | 62.59% | 3.32 |
1850 | Freundes | Braunbier | Braunbier | 1056.9 | 1036.6 | 2.60 | 34.57% | 3.56 |
1850 | Unknown, Berlin | Werder'sches Braunbier | Braunbier | 1030.4 | 1012.0 | 2.37 | 59.74% | |
1850 | Unknown, Berlin | Berliner Braunbier | Braunbier | 1058.1 | 1041.4 | 2.12 | 27.63% | 3.52 |
1879 | Remmer | Einfach Braunbier | Braunbier | 1038.5 | 1016.4 | 2.85 | 57.40% | |
1879 | Unknown, Bremen | Braunbier | Braunbier | 1059.1 | 1010 | 6.42 | 83.08% | |
1879 | Unknown, Bremen | Braunbier | Braunbier | 1057.3 | 1014 | 5.63 | 75.57% | |
1879 | Unknown, Bremen | Braunbier | Braunbier | 1049.9 | 1022 | 3.59 | 55.91% | |
1879 | Unknown, Bremen | Braunbier | Braunbier | 1049.5 | 1012 | 4.87 | 75.76% | |
1879 | Unknown, Bremen | Braunbier | Braunbier | 1044.5 | 1012.5 | 4.15 | 71.91% | |
1879 | Unknown, Bremen | Braunbier | Braunbier | 1061.1 | 1012 | 6.41 | 80.36% | |
1890 | Löwenbrauerei | Doppelbraunbier | Braunbier | 1029.9 | 1015.5 | 1.85 | 48.24% | 3.65 |
Sources: | ||||||||
Wahl & Henius, pages 823-830 | ||||||||
“Archive der Pharmacie”, 1855, pages 216-217 | ||||||||
Handwörterbuch der reinen und angewandten Chemie by Justus Liebig, Johann Christian Poggendorff, Friedrich Wöhler, 1858, page 1038 | ||||||||
"Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs- und Genussmittel" by Joseph König, 1889, pages 806 - 851 | ||||||||
"Handbuch der chemischen technologie" by Otto Dammer, Rudolf Kaiser, 1896, pages 696-697 |
You'll see that some of the beers are stronger than Schönfeld writes. Five of the beers in the table have an OG of over 14º Balling. Some are also pretty sour.
Monday, 8 June 2020
Provincial England Mild Ale during WW I
XX Ale was Adnams biggest-selling Mild Ale. And one they brewed right through the war. Since it started off with a far lower gravity than standard London Milds, the relative drop in gravity was much smaller. In the later stages of the war it formed the vast majority of the beer Adnams brewed.
In 1918 it had the same OG as Courage X Ale, even though that it had started the war with a gravity more than 12 points lower, 1042º as opposed to 1054.6º. It’s a good example of the war levelling out strength differences across the UK.
The Adnams XX recipe was amended several times during WW I.
The most obvious change is the disappearance of flaked maize in 1918. It’s something that’s seen at every brewery. Obviously, it simply wasn’t available. Either because maize wasn’t being imported or it was being diverted for food use. The proportion of maize when it was used is fairly low. 10-15% of the grist was common.
The occasional use of glucose and No. 3 invert was almost certainly due to supply problems. Glucose pops up quite often in wartime recipes while before the war it was quite rare.
In 1918 it had the same OG as Courage X Ale, even though that it had started the war with a gravity more than 12 points lower, 1042º as opposed to 1054.6º. It’s a good example of the war levelling out strength differences across the UK.
The Adnams XX recipe was amended several times during WW I.
The most obvious change is the disappearance of flaked maize in 1918. It’s something that’s seen at every brewery. Obviously, it simply wasn’t available. Either because maize wasn’t being imported or it was being diverted for food use. The proportion of maize when it was used is fairly low. 10-15% of the grist was common.
The occasional use of glucose and No. 3 invert was almost certainly due to supply problems. Glucose pops up quite often in wartime recipes while before the war it was quite rare.
Adnams XX Ale 1914 - 1920 | |||||||
Date | Year | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl |
10th Aug | 1914 | 1042 | 1007.0 | 4.63 | 83.33% | 4.20 | 0.73 |
30th Apr | 1915 | 1042 | 1008.9 | 4.38 | 78.90% | 4.33 | 0.76 |
18th Aug | 1915 | 1041 | 1004.4 | 4.84 | 89.19% | 4.46 | 0.76 |
18th Nov | 1915 | 1040 | 1006.4 | 4.45 | 84.07% | 4.46 | 0.76 |
31st Mar | 1916 | 1038 | 1005.5 | 4.29 | 85.42% | 4.59 | 0.75 |
2nd Oct | 1916 | 1035 | 1005.5 | 3.90 | 84.17% | 4.91 | 0.73 |
1st Jan | 1917 | 1035 | 1006.1 | 3.82 | 82.59% | 4.91 | 0.79 |
19th Mar | 1917 | 1034 | 1005.0 | 3.84 | 85.34% | 4.91 | 0.72 |
14th May | 1917 | 1027 | 1003.3 | 3.13 | 87.69% | 5.33 | 0.62 |
29th May | 1917 | 1024 | 1003.3 | 2.74 | 86.15% | 5.10 | 0.53 |
4th Apr | 1918 | 1024 | 1004.2 | 2.63 | 82.69% | 5.82 | 0.59 |
10th May | 1918 | 1022 | 1003.9 | 2.40 | 82.37% | 6.14 | 0.58 |
30th July | 1918 | 1022 | 1002.8 | 2.54 | 87.41% | 6.16 | 0.60 |
27th Nov | 1918 | 1022 | 1002.8 | 2.54 | 87.41% | 6.14 | 0.59 |
11th Apr | 1919 | 1022 | 1002.8 | 2.54 | 87.41% | 6.14 | 0.60 |
2nd Sep | 1919 | 1027 | 1005.0 | 2.91 | 81.53% | 7.53 | 0.86 |
19th Jan | 1920 | 1027 | 1003.3 | 3.13 | 87.69% | 5.23 | 0.71 |
Source: | |||||||
Adnams brewing records held at the brewery, |
Adnams XX Ale grists 1914 - 1920 | |||||||||||
Date | Year | OG | pale malt | crystal malt | medium malt | flaked maize | no. 2 sugar | no. 3 sugar | glucose | cane blocks | tintose |
10th Aug | 1914 | 1042 | 31.1% | 6.2% | 43.5% | 6.2% | 12.4% | 0.6% | |||
30th Apr | 1915 | 1042 | 6.4% | 73.7% | 6.4% | 4.3% | 8.5% | 0.6% | |||
18th Aug | 1915 | 1041 | 6.6% | 72.9% | 6.6% | 4.4% | 8.8% | 0.6% | |||
18th Nov | 1915 | 1040 | 39.7% | 6.6% | 33.1% | 6.6% | 4.4% | 8.8% | 0.6% | ||
31st Mar | 1916 | 1038 | 41.1% | 6.8% | 30.8% | 6.8% | 4.6% | 9.1% | 0.7% | ||
2nd Oct | 1916 | 1035 | 33.1% | 7.3% | 36.7% | 7.3% | 4.9% | 9.8% | 0.8% | ||
1st Jan | 1917 | 1035 | 33.1% | 7.3% | 36.7% | 7.3% | 4.9% | 9.8% | 0.8% | ||
19th Mar | 1917 | 1034 | 14.7% | 7.3% | 55.1% | 7.3% | 4.9% | 9.8% | 0.8% | ||
14th May | 1917 | 1027 | 10.6% | 5.3% | 63.7% | 5.3% | 7.1% | 7.1% | 0.9% | ||
29th May | 1917 | 1024 | 12.4% | 6.2% | 61.9% | 6.2% | 4.1% | 8.2% | 1.0% | ||
4th Apr | 1918 | 1024 | 22.0% | 5.5% | 55.0% | 5.5% | 7.3% | 3.7% | 0.9% | ||
10th May | 1918 | 1022 | 22.9% | 5.7% | 57.1% | 5.7% | 7.6% | 1.0% | |||
30th July | 1918 | 1022 | 11.7% | 5.8% | 64.2% | 5.8% | 7.8% | 3.9% | 0.8% | ||
27th Nov | 1918 | 1022 | 35.0% | 5.8% | 46.6% | 7.8% | 3.9% | 1.0% | |||
11th Apr | 1919 | 1022 | 11.7% | 5.8% | 69.9% | 7.8% | 3.9% | 1.0% | |||
2nd Sep | 1919 | 1027 | 0.0% | 5.0% | 80.7% | 13.4% | 0.8% | ||||
19th Jan | 1920 | 1027 | 16.8% | 4.2% | 67.1% | 11.2% | 0.7% | ||||
Source: | |||||||||||
Adnams brewing records held at the brewery, |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)