It seems some beer was being shipped to Madagascar. Though, given its size, the quantities weren't really that large. Only around 2,500 Imperial barrels. To put that into context, the UK exported over 20,000 barrels to Malta annually.
The Beer Trade of Madagascar.
The quantity of beer annually imported into Madagascar is very considerable, the estimated quantity for the past year being about 4,000 hectols. (hectol. 22 imperial gallons). This total shows a marked increase over the figures for the two preceding years, viz., 2,000 and 3,000 hectols. in 1899 and 1900 respectively.
In the district of Diego Suarez there is an annual sale of about 20,000 bottles of beer. They are imported in cases containing 24 or 48 bottles, each bottle containing about 0.7 litres (1.23 pints). The retail price is from 1.25 francs to 1.50 francs per bottle, and is practically the same in the whole coast region for beer of French manufacture.
In the Province of Tamatave and the districts of Andovoranto and Vatomandry, the sales reach to about 150,000 bottles per annum. The retail price ranges from 1.25 francs to 1.50 francs per bottle for French beers, and from 1.75 francs to 2 francs for British or German beers.
About 120,000 bottles of French and German beers are annually sold in the Province of Majunga. German beer, although dearer in consequence of the Customs duty, sells well owing to its quality. The price of French beer is from 1.25 francs to 1.50 franca per bottle; that of German beer is about 2 francs per bottle.
With regard to the less important provinces, the yearly consumption of beer in the Province of Imerina amounts to about 200,000 bottles, in the Provinces of Ambositra and Botsileo about 30,000 bottles each, in the Cercle Tulear about 15,000 bottles, and in the Province of Nossi-Bé about 8,000 bottles of French beer, and 8,000 bottles of German beer from Hamburg and Bohemia.
It should be noted that French beers enter Madagascar free, and have to pay only the consumption duty of 10 centimes per bottle, or 5 francs per hectolitre when imported in casks. Foreign beers have to pay the same consumption duty as French beers, and in addition an import duty of 12 francs per 100 kiloms. gross.
The Brewers' Journal vol. 38 1902, March 15th 1902, page 124.
Interesting that the French didn't have a monopoly on beer imports. There was also a lot of German beer. Though some of the beer described as "German" was from Bohemia, which was actually German Austrian at the time. I assume that the French beer was Lager like the German stuff. I could be wrong.
If I knew what a franc was worth at the time, I could make some comments about the prices. But I don't, so we'll have to pass on that.
11 comments:
There's a chart at the link below that says a 1907 franc was worth 3.5 2007 euros. So taking some liberties and wild assumptions, French beer was around 4 or 5 (2007) Euros, German beer around 7 (2007) Euros for those 0.7 litre bottles.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_franc
Small typo I expect but wasn't Bohemia part of Austria Hungry in 1902?
No good publishing 18 year old information.
Oscar
It was indeed.
Oscar
Very cool history! I have spent a decent bit of time in Madagascar, and nowadays beer made in-country is the standard. Three Horses Beer is probably the most popular (and quite tasty!), as a standard adjunct lager - produced since 1958. I'd be interested to learn more about what people were drinking at that time, and who the market was - primarily colonists? (which would make sense given the relatively low import volume).
Thanks for the feedback. I remember now why I don't bother with Twitter anymore.
A 2007 euro is worth 1.47 euros today according to online inflation calculators
The 2024/2025 figures for what a euro is worth to a 1902 Franc should be out.
Oscar
Andy more than likely colonists. Nigerians were first allowed to buy Guinness in the 1920’s.
Oscar
I was quoting the link to the Wikipedia article on the French Franc, which only has the 2007 data. I considered a comparison between 1902 and 2007, a period of over a hundred years, might be of some use in the debate. I, personally, was not 'publishing' anything; merely quoting in a genuine attempt to add something useful to the debate. As I quite directly said, your comment was quite reminiscent of the reasons why I dropped twitter. A kinder response might be to ask if more recent data were available. Ultimately, it's Ron's choice to publish what he wishes to publish on his blog. And he published the comment. Rubbishing other people's contributions to this blog is not really in the spirit, Oscar. Breathe.
Fair enough. Oscar
Post a Comment