A ridiculous percentage of the retail price of beer was the tax. As I will demonstrate in my usual way - with a table. Having lots and lots of numbers to hand, I can magic up how much of the money you handed over the bar was going straight into the chancellor's pocket.
A note about how I've come up with the figures. To calculate the average tax per pint, I've simply divided the total tax paid by the number of bulk barrels brewed that year. For the average price of a pint, I've used the price of Barclay Perkins Ordinary Bitter, XLK, which was about average gravity. Not totally precise, but close enough.
A standard barrel, in case you're wondering was a nominal unit for calculating tax, that is 36 Imperial gallons with an OG of 1055º. Bulk barrels are the actual volume of beer produced.
From an already high 30% of the retail price at the start of the war, by its end it was pushing double that. Truly eye-watering.
What effect did the high rate of tax have on the industry? It certainly couldn't have done much for competition. Unless you were operating on a vast scale, any small economies in production or raw materials were going to be an insignificant part of the retail price.
It also incentivised getting beer tax-free. Either by reusing ullage (returned beer) or any grotty bits of beer left at the bottom of fermenters, etc. Brewers were allowed a 6% loss on the volume put into fermenting vessels. If you could cut your wastage to just 2%, you got 4% of your beer free of tax. This was the major advantage large brewers had over their smaller competitors.
UK tax and price per pint 1939 - 1949 | |||||||
Year | Total Tax £ | Bulk Barrels | Tax/Std. Brl | Av. OG | price pint | tax pint | Tax (% retail price) |
1939 | 62,370,034 | 24,674,992 | 80s | 1040.93 | 7d | 2.11d | 30.09% |
1940 | 75,157,022 | 25,366,782 | 80s / 104s | 1040.62 | 8d | 2.47d | 30.86% |
1941 | 133,450,205 | 26,203,803 | 135s / 165s | 1038.51 | 10d | 4.24d | 42.44% |
1942 | 157,254,430 | 29,860,798 | 165s /240s 7.5d | 1035.53 | 12d | 4.39d | 36.57% |
1943 | 209,584,343 | 29,296,672 | 240s 7.5d / 281s 10.5d | 1034.34 | 13d | 5.96d | 45.86% |
1944 | 263,170,703 | 30,478,289 | 281s 10.5d / 286s 5.5d | 1034.63 | 13d | 7.20d | 55.35% |
1945 | 278,876,870 | 31,332,852 | 286s 5.5d | 1034.54 | 13d | 7.42d | 57.05% |
1946 | 295,305,369 | 32,650,200 | 286s 5.5d | 1034.72 | 13d | 7.54d | 57.98% |
1947 | 250,350,829 | 29,261,398 | 286s 5.5d | 1032.59 | 13d | 7.13d | 54.84% |
1948 | 264,112,043 | 30,408,634 | 325s 5d | 1032.66 | 15d | 7.24d | 48.25% |
1949 | 294,678,035 | 26,990,144 | 364s 4.5d / 343s 4.5d | 1033.43 | 16d | 9.10d | 56.86% |
Sources: | |||||||
1955 Brewers' Almanack, pages 50 & 80. | |||||||
1971 Brewers' Almanack, pages 45 & 75. | |||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001. | |||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/002. |
2 comments:
Odd to think that nowadays the duty on a pint is only around 10% of the price and yet we hear more from brewers about the unbearable burden it is than ever before.
This is interesting stuff. It would be an education to see a history of taxation that compared beer taxes to liquor, tobacco, gambling and other things seen as vices (to some people at least). Likewise to get a sense of how industries organized against them and the alternatives they may have pushed (cutting spending, raising taxes in other ways,forcing the Royal Family to work odd jobbs on weekends). It would also be interesting to see how taxation drove decolonization debates. Maybe there is a good book out there somewhere.
Post a Comment