"POOL BEER DENIAL
Brewers have not Considered Possibility
The Brewers' Society there is no truth in the statement, which has appeared in certain newspapers, that brewers have considered the possibility of pooling beer or brewing only one class of mild ale and one of bitter. The Society has no knowledge of any canvass having been taken in licensed houses on any proposal to sell pool beer.
Further, the suggestion that brewers' stocks of barley are to be rationed is without foundation.
The only proposal with regard to barley which has been considered is that if it becomes necessary to draw on brewers' shocks for seed purposes, arrangements may be wade with that object In view at a later stage. but so far the departments concerned are satisfied that the seed position is sound.
It is true that brewers and maltsters hold considerable stocks of British barley. They bought heavily of the season's crop in response to a request of the authorities at an early stage, but their stocks of barley generally are no bigger than they usually carry at this time of the year, having regard to the fact that practically no Californian barley, which most brewers like to mix with home-grown barley, is available."
Coatbridge Express - Wednesday 07 February 1940, page 4.
While the Brewers' Society was correct, at the time, about beer pooling it did sort of take place. Through the mechanism of beer zoning, whereby distant tied houses were served by another brewer. The intention being to save on transportation at a time when fuel was in short supply.
And while brewers may not have set out to brew just a single Mild and a single Bitter, something of the kind did take place. Brewers trimmed down their ranges considerably, dropping beers like 8d Bitters because draught beers over 1050º no longer made economic sense.
While the number of Milds brewed was reduced as falling gravities concertinaed together strengths. And when a beer hit 1027º, there was nowhere for it to go as that was the weakest economic strength. As a beer with a lower gravity would still be taxed at the 1027º rate.
Fullers is a good example. Down from 8 beers in 1939, to just 4 in 1946.One in each style.
Fullers beers in 1939 | ||||||||
Date | Beer | Style | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl |
30th Oct | X | Mild | 1032.7 | 1007.5 | 3.33 | 77.12% | 6.96 | 0.95 |
6th Nov | XX | Mild | 1042.7 | 1010.5 | 4.25 | 75.32% | 6.93 | 1.22 |
24th Oct | AK | Pale Ale | 1033.4 | 1006.6 | 3.53 | 80.07% | 9.19 | 1.25 |
17th Oct | XK | Pale Ale | 1039.4 | 1010.0 | 3.89 | 74.67% | 9.21 | 1.45 |
24th Oct | PA | Pale Ale | 1051.1 | 1013.0 | 5.04 | 74.53% | 9.19 | 1.91 |
9th Nov | P | Porter | 1038.5 | 1013.0 | 3.37 | 66.19% | 7.62 | 1.35 |
18th Oct | BO | Strong Ale | 1055.5 | 1015.2 | 5.32 | 72.54% | 7.01 | 1.63 |
8th Nov | OBE | Strong Ale | 1069.6 | 1013.3 | 7.45 | 80.90% | 7.29 | 2.00 |
Source: | ||||||||
Fullers brewing records held at the brewery |
Fullers beers in 1946 | ||||||||
Date | Beer | Style | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl |
3rd Oct | X | Mild | 1029.6 | 1008.3 | 2.81 | 71.88% | 4.83 | 0.59 |
2nd Oct | PA | Pale Ale | 1029.5 | 1008.3 | 2.81 | 71.86% | 6.94 | 0.83 |
22nd Oct | P | Porter | 1029.3 | 1010.5 | 2.48 | 64.08% | 5.95 | 0.81 |
25th Nov | BO | Strong Ale | 1038.8 | 1010.8 | 3.70 | 72.14% | 4.77 | 0.77 |
Source: | ||||||||
Fullers brewing records held at the brewery |
No comments:
Post a Comment