Wednesday, 1 August 2018

Let's Brew Wednesday - 1965 Drybrough Keg Heavy

There’s a name to fill a drinker’s heart with dread: Keg Heavy. Not a well-loved type of beer.

By 1965 it made up a large proportion of what Drybrough brewed, having overtaken 60/- as their most popular product. What was odd about their beer range in the 1950s was that it lacked a 70/-. Keg Heavy seems to have first appeared around June 1960, though there had been a  beer of a similar gravity, B/XXP (presumably Bottling XXP), for a while before.

This beer dates from just after Drybrough underwent the worst fate for any brewery: being bought by Watney. no suprise, then, that they were keen on pushing keg. The brewery continued in production until the early 1980s, when Watney finally pulled the plug. In their later years cask beer did make a return, in the form of a 70/- and an 80/-. Never had either, myself, as far as I can recall.

This looks very much like an English Ordinary Bitter. Except for the poor attenuation and the very low level of hopping. It must have been pretty sweet. All those residual sugars probably took on a lovely boiled sweet character after heavy pasteurisation. I’m sure it tasted great.


1965 Drybrough Keg Heavy
pale malt 6.00 lb 74.91%
black malt 0.01 lb 0.12%
flaked maize 1.00 lb 12.48%
malt extract 0.25 lb 3.12%
No. 2 invert sugar 0.75 lb 9.36%
Fuggles 90 min 0.50 oz
Goldings 30 min 0.50 oz
OG 1037
FG 1014
ABV 3.04
Apparent attenuation 62.16%
IBU 14
SRM 6
Mash at 146º F
Sparge at 165º F
Boil time 90 minutes
pitching temp 62º F
Yeast WLP028 Edinburgh Ale

2 comments:

Phil said...

Had this once; very dim memories of something like a budget best bitter but heavy on the caramel. My strongest memory is of acute embarrassment at the name. At school, if I ever wanted to put on a Scottish accent I'd think of Billy Connolly doing broad Glasgow and run through a couple of phrases - and "pint of heavy" was one of them. Approaching the bar I automatically thought "pynt o' HEHH-veeh", and then worried I'd actually say it. What I actually said was the most English, most RP "Pint Of Heavy" you could imagine, and sounded even more ridiculous.

Why couldn't they just call it 'bitter' and have done?

Jonno said...

How did they manage to get such poor attenuation with a mash temp of 146? Deliberately underpitching the yeast?