Imperial Mild. There's a name to conjure with (maybe turn it into a rabbit or something). The name has been used by others, but I'd like to set its definition in stone so future generations will be able to cherish it. A bit like other style guidelines. Didn't the head prophet at the BJCP bring down stone tablets of beer style definitions down from Mount Sinai? Though obviously there were more than 10. Must have been a real struggle carrying 100-odd lumps of stone.
My definition of Imperial Mild - get your chisel ready - is this: Mils ale with a gravity over 1100º. Do you think I'm being too specific? At least you don't have to do much carving.
Why am I being so jovial? Have to find something top write about. You'll see what I mean when you look at the table:
England vs Scotland early 1850's Mild >1100º | |||||||||||||||
Date | Year | Brewer | Beer | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl | boil time (hours) | boil time (hours) | boil time (hours) | Pitch temp | max. fer-ment-ation temp | length of fer-ment-ation (days) |
19th Oct | 1850 | Truman | XXX Ale | 1102.8 | 12 | 5.59 | 58 | ||||||||
5th Oct | 1850 | Truman | XXX Ale | 1102.8 | 12 | 6.24 | 59 | ||||||||
18th Feb | 1851 | Truman | XXX Ale | 1105.8 | 10 | 5.19 | 58 | ||||||||
4th Sep | 1850 | Truman | XXX Ale | 1108 | 14 | 8.14 | 59 | ||||||||
19th Aug | 1850 | Truman | XXX Ale | 1108 | 1029.1 | 10.44 | 73.08% | 14 | 8.48 | 59 | 77 | 10 | |||
Average | 1105.5 | 1029.1 | 10.44 | 73.08% | 12.40 | 6.73 | 58.6 | 77.0 | 10.0 | ||||||
1st Nov | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1100 | 1040 | 7.94 | 60.00% | 6.00 | 3.00 | 1.25 | 1.5 | 55 | 68 | 8 | |
10th Oct | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1101 | 1040 | 8.07 | 60.40% | 6.95 | 3.52 | 1.25 | 1.33 | 58 | 69 | 8 | |
5th Nov | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1101 | 1041 | 7.94 | 59.41% | 5.00 | 2.47 | 1.33 | 1.25 | 55 | 69 | 9 | |
16th Apr | 1853 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1102 | 1039 | 8.33 | 61.76% | 8.26 | 4.75 | 1.25 | 56 | 70 | 8 | ||
19th Apr | 1853 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1102 | 1033 | 9.13 | 67.65% | 8.70 | 5.56 | 1.25 | 55 | 67 | 7 | ||
13th Dec | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1103 | 1040 | 8.33 | 61.17% | 10.00 | 5.50 | 1.25 | 54 | 68 | 9 | ||
23rd Jul | 1852 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1103 | 1040 | 8.33 | 61.17% | 7.81 | 4.03 | 1 | 1.08 | 59 | 70 | 8 | |
27th Jul | 1852 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1103 | 1040 | 8.33 | 61.17% | 7.14 | 3.85 | 1.08 | 1.17 | 59 | 69 | 8 | |
7th Oct | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1104 | 1039 | 8.60 | 62.50% | 5.24 | 2.86 | 1.5 | 1.25 | 56 | 69 | 9 | |
15th Oct | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1104 | 1040 | 8.47 | 61.54% | 5.00 | 2.65 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 56 | 68 | 9 | |
25th Oct | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1104 | 1040 | 8.47 | 61.54% | 5.00 | 2.79 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 58 | 68 | 9 | |
6th Nov | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1104 | 1040 | 8.47 | 61.54% | 5.00 | 2.65 | 1.33 | 1.25 | 56 | 69 | 10 | |
17th Nov | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1104 | 1042 | 8.20 | 59.62% | 5.00 | 2.53 | 1.25 | 1.5 | 55 | 68 | 9 | |
27th Nov | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1104 | 1042 | 8.20 | 59.62% | 5.00 | 2.62 | 1.25 | 1.75 | 55 | 68 | 10 | |
24th Mar | 1852 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1104 | 1041 | 8.33 | 60.58% | 5.00 | 2.56 | 1.25 | 1 | 56 | 68 | 9 | |
25th Mar | 1852 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1104 | 1042 | 8.20 | 59.62% | 5.00 | 2.50 | 1.17 | 1.08 | 55 | 68 | 10 | |
25th Apr | 1853 | Younger, Wm. | 120/- | 1104 | 1046 | 7.67 | 55.77% | 9.00 | 6.25 | 1.5 | 54 | 68 | 8 | ||
31st Oct | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1105 | 1042 | 8.33 | 60.00% | 5.00 | 2.59 | 1.25 | 1.5 | 54 | 69 | 10 | |
4th Dec | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1105 | 1042 | 8.33 | 60.00% | 5.66 | 2.82 | 1.25 | 55 | 69 | 9 | ||
26th Apr | 1853 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1105 | 1039 | 8.73 | 62.86% | 9.09 | 6.15 | 1.25 | 55 | 70 | 7 | ||
24th Oct | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1106 | 1045 | 8.07 | 57.55% | 5.00 | 2.95 | 1.25 | 1.33 | 56 | 69 | 8 | |
12th Nov | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1106 | 1041 | 8.60 | 61.32% | 5.00 | 2.58 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 56 | 69 | 8 | |
26th Feb | 1852 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1106 | 1042 | 8.47 | 60.38% | 4.49 | 2.38 | 1.17 | 1 | 55 | 68 | 11 | |
8th Oct | 1851 | Younger, Wm. | 100/- | 1108 | 1041 | 8.86 | 62.04% | 5.24 | 2.89 | 1.33 | 1.17 | 55 | 69 | 9 | |
Average | 1103.8 | 1040.7 | 8.35 | 60.26% | 6.19 | 3.44 | 1.26 | 1.27 | 55.8 | 68.6 | 8.8 | ||||
difference | -1.6 | 11.6 | -2.09 | -2.24% | -6.21 | -3.29 | 1.26 | 1.27 | -2.9 | -8.4 | -1.3 | ||||
Sources: | |||||||||||||||
William Younger brewing record document number WY/6/1/2/5 held at the Scottish Brewing Archive | |||||||||||||||
Truman brewing record document number B/THB/C/132 held at the London Metropolitan Archives |
See what I mean? So many details are missing from the London beers that there's not much to compare. I'll limit myself to those items where there's enough information to work with.
Hopping rates. Now isn't this confusing. Younger's are on average much lower, which isn't what we saw in the other classes of Mild. And the spread amongst the Younger's beers is enormous: from 2.38 to 6.25 lbs per barrel. I can make no sense out of them. A couple are hopped in a way similar to the London beers, others at a much, much lower rate. For once, I don't know what to say.
Fermentation temperatures. We've only got enough data for pitching temperature. I love this. Lovely and clear, all the data nicely clumped together. I'm oozing confidence as I say: in the early 1850's Younger's Imperial Mild Ales were pitched on average about 3º F cooler than equivalent London beers.
Bit disappointing that. Not really anything much to say.
5 comments:
I've seen the same thing in some Tennent's logs. Hopping rates jumping about wildly with no apparent reason to it.
It makes me suspect there was some re-use of hops going on. Why else would you be using 2.5 pounds a barrel for one brew and 6 pounds for the next?
Barm, I know Younger did re-use hops. But it's clearly indicated in the records. Some of their Stouts had no fresh hops at all.
I suspect some of Younger's shilling Ales were brewed as Stock Ales and others as Mild Ales, which would explain the difference in hopping rates.
Another thing to bear in mind is that the hopping rate was usually increased in the summer.
Now that would make sense. I'll look at the Tennent's stuff and see if what they were doing is congruent with Stock and Mild Ale.
Increased in the summer, yes, but more than doubled?
Summer hopping...
Doubling to compensate for the staling of hops would not be out of the question.
At 20° C (68 F) for 6 months with no barrier packaging, EKG loose 45% and Fuggles loose 37%.
Table:
http://www.brewingtechniques.com/library/backissues/issue2.1/garetztable.html#1
Full article:
http://www.brewingtechniques.com/library/backissues/issue2.1/garetz.html
Derek, thanks for the information. Thing is, they kept the hops tightly packed and in a cool storeroom.
Post a Comment