Only PA contained pale malt. The other beers all used something called medium malt as a base. I’m assuming that it was something along the lines of mild malt, but I could be wrong. It’s use in darker beers suggests that it’s less fancy base malt.
The grists of XX, XXXX and DS are all very similar, except the latter includes chocolate malt as well as amber and crystal. At thus point it was unusual to find amber malt in anything other than Porter and Stout.
The grist of PA is incredibly simple, containing just pale malt and No. 1 invert sugar. That’s about as stripped down as Bitter recipes come.
The sugar content, at around 15% of the grist is quite. But as Adnams used no adjuncts, the malt percentage is about the same, or even a little higher, than was the norm.
There are no proprietary sugars, just No. 1 and No. 3 invert. Which, by this time, was pretty old-school. Many brewers used all sorts of specialised sugar products, often designed for a particular type of beer. No. 3 is exactly what you would expect to find in dark beers like XX and XXXX.
Adnams malts in 1939 | ||||||||
Date | Beer | Style | OG | pale malt | amber malt | choc. Malt | crystal malt | medium malt |
22nd May | XX | Mild Ale | 1029 | 4.79% | 4.79% | 76.62% | ||
24th May | XXXX | Old Ale | 1055 | 4.81% | 4.81% | 76.91% | ||
23rd May | PA | Pale Ale | 1039 | 87.10% | ||||
8th Jun | DS | Stout | 1042 | 5.96% | 5.96% | 5.96% | 71.57% | |
Source: | ||||||||
Adnams brewing record Book 26 held at the brewery. |
Adnams malts in 1939 | |||||||
Date | Beer | Style | OG | no. 1 sugar | no. 3 sugar | Tintose | total |
22nd May | XX | Mild Ale | 1029 | 12.77% | 1.03% | 13.80% | |
24th May | XXXX | Old Ale | 1055 | 12.82% | 0.66% | 13.48% | |
23rd May | PA | Pale Ale | 1039 | 12.90% | 12.90% | ||
8th Jun | DS | Stout | 1042 | 7.95% | 2.59% | 10.54% | |
Source: | |||||||
Adnams brewing record Book 26 held at the brewery. |
3 comments:
Hi Ron ,
Peter Walker & Sons ( Warrington & Burton ) Ltd were , using Amber Malt in their Bitter Beers from 1891 to the 1920`s ; around the time of the merger with Cain`s of Liverpool
Cheers
Edd
Edd,
that's interesting. Definitely not standard pratice, from what I've seen elsewhere.
But that's the fun of brewing records - finding the unexpected.
Hi Ron ,
You`re certainly right there ; all sorts of weird and wonderfull info can be hidden under the metaphorical bushels of old brewing records ! , from the changes in grist make up of the same beer in a short time period eg : Charles Rose & Co`s beers 1895 - 8 ; to the downright obtusity of records like the Drybrough brewing books .
Cheers ,
Edd
Post a Comment