Wednesday, 7 March 2012

Another look at Scottish hopping

I'm always looking for new ways to analyse Scottish hopping rates. This is, I think, one of the best yet. Thank Brewer's Almanack and its many tables.

Because one lists brewing materials used and the number of barrels brewed each year. Which means I can easily work out the average hopping rate of beer brewed in the UK. Pretty handy, eh? Then there's William Younger. Their brewing records have a similar table. Combine the two and what do you get? Numbers fun.

It seems like a pretty fair comparison to me. How did Younger's hop usage stack up against the UK in general? I'll be honest, the results aren't very clear. Then there's a caveat about the numbers themselves. The dry hops are missing for some breweries in the UK figures. While they are included in the Younger's ones. Getting Confused? It gets worse. Younger's records have three different figures for the amount of beer brewed: barrels in the tun, barrels cleansed and excise barrels. Which to use? Because the barrels brewed in the UK figures is, I'm pretty sure, the number of barrels on which duty was charged. Or excise barrels. Whereas the materials are those used to brew the beer before any losses. That is, a larger number of barrels. So the real average quantity of hops per barrel would be lower. Because some of the hops would have been in the barrels lost during production.

On the face of, I should use the number of excise barrels. But, to be on the safe side, I've included the figures for both excise barrels and barrels in tun (i.e. number of barrels actually brewed). Feel free to use which ever set you prefer.


Brewing materials and hopping rates 1914 - 1950
UK Younger
year grains (qtrs) sugar (qtrs) total (qtrs) hops (lbs) barrels hops lbs/barrel hops lbs/qtr hops lbs/barrel (in tuns) hops lbs/barrel (excise) hops lbs/qtr
1914 7,099,421 1,639,855 8,739,276 62,655,376 36,162,273 1.73 7.17 1.30 1.40 5.95
1920 5,606,089 1,067,796 6,673,884 56,351,680 34,776,258 1.62 8.44
1922 4,418,298 811,034 5,229,332 44,632,672 27,815,249 1.60 8.54 1.45 1.59 6.60
1924 4,048,132 849,885 4,898,017 39,247,936 25,927,783 1.51 8.01 1.50 1.63 6.83
1926 3,932,891 916,457 4,849,348 39,802,000 25,987,830 1.53 8.21
1928 3,790,826 919,135 4,709,961 37,034,144 24,981,731 1.48 7.86
1930 3,622,839 917,619 4,540,458 34,416,368 24,488,629 1.41 7.58
1931 3,276,937 849,082 4,126,019 31,069,472 22,561,497 1.38 7.53 1.35 1.48 6.46
1932 2,553,740 688,563 3,242,303 24,593,744 18,864,711 1.30 7.59
1933 2,591,074 689,983 3,281,056 24,961,216 18,931,185 1.32 7.61 1.30 1.48 6.75
1934 2,851,752 771,614 3,623,366 26,142,928 20,378,879 1.28 7.22 1.04 1.27 5.49
1935 3,014,416 815,963 3,830,379 27,859,328 21,598,179 1.29 7.27
1936 3,083,263 852,709 3,935,972 28,929,600 22,207,859 1.30 7.35
1937 3,242,085 917,943 4,160,028 30,306,304 23,608,658 1.28 7.29
1938 3,360,389 947,387 4,307,776 31,118,752 24,339,360 1.28 7.22
1939 3,543,161 993,239 4,536,400 32,000,080 25,691,217 1.25 7.05
1940 3,409,779 766,388 4,176,167 29,737,344 24,925,704 1.19 7.12 0.80 0.85 4.93
1941 3,749,022 698,821 4,447,843 28,151,648 28,170,582 1.00 6.33
1942 3,784,318 705,711 4,490,029 24,976,784 29,584,656 0.84 5.56
1943 3,855,366 700,287 4,555,652 25,937,968 29,811,321 0.87 5.69
1944 4,001,824 729,324 4,731,148 27,316,800 31,380,684 0.87 5.77
1945 4,004,332 892,032 4,896,364 27,420,064 31,990,334 0.86 5.60
1946 3,749,165 895,011 4,644,176 25,334,064 31,066,950 0.82 5.46
1947 3,387,187 800,593 4,187,780 24,389,008 30,103,180 0.81 5.82
1948 3,392,205 721,779 4,113,984 25,924,640 28,813,725 0.90 6.30
1949 3,217,710 651,606 3,869,316 26,113,696 26,744,457 0.98 6.75
1950 3,201,590 642,939 3,844,529 26,093,648 25,339,062 1.03 6.79 0.83 1.18 5.12
Sources:
William Younger brewing records documents WY/6/1/2/45, WY/6/1/2/58, WY/6/1/2/63, WY/6/1/2/68, WY/6/1/2/70, WY/6/1/2/76 and WY/6/1/2/88 held at the Scottish Brewing Archive
1953 Brewers' Almanack 1955, page 62


Between 1922 and 1934, Younger's average hopping rate is very close to the national average. In 1914 and 1940, however, it's a fair bit lower. For 1950, it depends on which barrelage figure you pick. One's about 20% less, the other about 15% more.

Despite the problems with the numbers, it would seem difficult to claim that Younger used a much smaller quantity of hops in its beers than the average for the UK. Remember that the averages include the large Burton brewers who between them would have been responsible for several million barrels. I can't imagine they were hopping at the average rate.

Overall, slightly negative evidence. By which I mean, there's nothing in there to back up the assertion that Scottish brewers used significantly smaller quantities of hops than English brewers.

Tuesday, 6 March 2012

Arrol raises more cash

It seems the floatation of Arrol didn't quite go to plan. Because just four years later they were raising more cash by issuing new preference shares. That is, getting yet more external money while leaving the directors in full control. 

But first the directors had to persuade the existing preference share holders.

"Archibald Arrol & Sons, Limited. - An extraordinary general meeting of the preference shareholders of Archibald Arrol &. Sons, Limited, was held in London yesterday for the purpose of considering resolutions for the increase of the capital of the Company to £400,000 by the creation and issue of 15,000 new preference shares of £10 each. Mr W. A, Arrol, who presided over a small attendance, said the development of the Company's business had not been quite so rapid as at first anticipated, but still the net profits had shown considerable advantage. For the year 1898, after bringing the reserve account up to £12,000, writing down £3000, and making a depreciation allowance of £6000, the net profits were £28,619, showing an increase of fully £8000 on the previous year. During the period from 1st June to 30th November last the business done at the Glasgow and Newcastle offices increased in volume by 31.5 per cent., as compared with the corresponding period of the previous year. The dividends on the ordinary stock had been for the first year 5 per cent., for the second year 6 per cent., and for the third year 10 percent. When the Company was formed in June, 1895, the houses under agreement to take beer from them, and also the houses belonging to the Company, stood at 72. Now there were more than three times that number. When the Company was incorporated the assets were £416,276. and in May last they amounted to £574,395. An increase of capital was now absolutely necessary for the proper conducting of such a good concern, and the directors had deemed it advisable to ask the preference shareholders to give power to increase the capital. He could not, at the moment, say that all this stock would be issued, but the Directors would take good care that it would be issued so as not in any way to be detrimental to the shares of tbe Company. With this increased capital the Directors hoped they would be able to secure and take advantage of certain options on good property which they had and pay off certain mortgages. He then moved the resolution for the increase of capital, and this was seconded by Mr John Meikle. Mr Plowman asked whether the increased capital proposed was or the specific object of buying public-house property in order to secure trade. The Chairman said the capital was wanted to pay off some mortgages and to enable them to assist in the trade, so as to secure their custom. It was not to be sunk in stone and lime. In Scotland the trade was not carried on in the same way as in England. The new stock would be issued at par, and only issued as the Directors saw fit. The trade in Scotland had sent in applications for the stock, so that showed they were very well satisfied with the investment. Other shareholders stated that it would be as well that the balance-sheet should be submitted to the preference shareholders, to which the Chairman said the powers for such circulation would be taken in the article of association. The resolutions were carried in a poll, which had to be taken because there was not a quorum of preference shareholders present in person. The poll showed that 118 shareholders (representing 4796 shares) were for the resolutions, and one shareholder (representing 150 shares) was against. Another motion making the necessary changes in the articles of association was then agreed to.
Dundee Courier - Wednesday 25 January 1899, page 3.
That's quite a pub estate that they'd built up in the four years of the limited company's existence. More than 200. Of course, buying pubs had been the main aim of the floatation. Which is why the directors' assertion that the new capital wasn't to be used for more pub acquisitions is so fascinating. The implication is that it was to be used to boost their Scottish trade, presumably in the form of loans to publicans. An interesting change of tack and a tacit admission that the English tied estate venture hadn't been totally successful.

The profits hadn't rolled in as expected. 5%, 6% and 10% dividends for the ordinary shareholders doesn't sound that bad. Until you start comparing them to the dividends at other Scottish brewers like, say William McEwan. There the directors had received dividends and bonuses of 25% in 1895 and 30% in 1896.

This wouldn't be the last time Arrol fiddled with its capital. A sign everything wasn't going as planned. We'll learn more about that later.

Monday, 5 March 2012

Me and my Spoons

 Or rather my kids and their Spoons. We've recently been in Manchester. Much of it spent in Wetherspoons. Mostly to feed the boys without ripping a gigantic hole in my wallet.

We tried three of the four city centre Wetherspoons. They were surprisingly diverse. In beer selection, atmosphere and service. The beer quality was good in two. *

Paramount was top for me. My hand twitched involuntarily as I cruised along the bar and spotted a DIPA, a 6.5% Porter and stuff that reminded me how poorly I've been keeping track of of Britain's brewery explosion. I should have stuck with the Porter. For, well, ever. Totally my kind of beer. And in proper condition. I liked it so much, I went back again just to have another pint.

The kids preferred the Moon Under Water. Mostly because the wifi was better, but also because it's roomier. And I have to say that the service was top class. Very friendly staff who clearly enjoyed their work. The beer selection wasn't as wide or interesting, but all the ones me and Dolores tried were in good condition. And we got stroll arm in arm down Speicher Straße** with pints of Kingsdown Ale. Not that I particularly want to remember Swindon. I've spent much of the last 20 years trying to erase all trace of it from my mind.

The poshest looking Wetherspoons, the Waterhouse, was disappointing. Tables too close together, rubbish wifi and an undrinkable pint. The staff weren't that nice, either. We left within 10 minutes.

Comparing the Paramount with the Port Street beer House - reckoned to be one of the best beer pubs in town - was revealing. I preferred the beer in the Paramount. And not just because it was half the price.

Where would we be without Spoons? Trying to eat soup with a knife and fork.




* I only had one pint in the other, so it could just have been one duff beer. I should say that I ordered a single pint. I couldn't drink it all, it was so revolting.
** How Google Translate interpreted Memory Street.

Sunday, 4 March 2012

Kindle editions of Porter! and Decoction!

The kids have finally got their fingers out and sorted the technical problems with creating Kindle editions. Or Rather Lexie has. And all just for cash money.

He's done two so far, "Porter!" and "Decoction!".








After he's gone to all that trouble. it would be a shame if none of you bastards bought them.

For those in the USA, these are the links:

Porter!

Decoction!

Arrol in court again

You're probably bored of court reports. But I'm not, so  here's another. In my defence, it's quite different from the others I've published. And it's directly related to a previous post. That would be if I felt I needed to justify myself. Which I don't particularly.

Mr. Smyrke the lawyer. I told you we'd be meeting with him again. This is the day. The case was all about how he became involved in Arrol's flotation.

"KEY V. ARCHIBALD ARROL & SONS.

The record was closed by Lord Kincairney in an action in which William Key, brewers' agent and licensed victualler, Sunderland, sues the late firm of Archibald Arrol & Sons, brewers, Alloa and Glasgow, for payment of £11,250. The pursuer states that for several years prior to 1 November, 1893, he had certain dealings with the defenders. In 1893 the latter conceived a scheme to form their business into a limited liability company, and to acquire licenses houses in which to sell the beer manufactured by them. The annual profits from their business was only £1500 or thereby. The defenders were themselves unable to find the capital requisite for a floating their business, and they consulted the pursuer on the subject, as he was a person of experience and influence, with the view of floating the limited company. As a remuneration for introducing a person through whose a instrumentality a limited liability company would be incorporated, Walter Arrol offered to pay the pursuer a commission of 2.5 per cent on the nominal capital of the company to incorporated. The pursuer introduced to the defenders Mr Benjamin Smyrke, a chartered account in Sunderland, and through the efforts of the pursuer and Mr Smyrke the company of Archibald Arrol & Sons (Limited) was floated. The share capital was £250,000, with a debenture stock of £200,000, and on this total of £450,000 the persuer seeks a commission of £11,250, being at the rate of 2.5 per cent. The company has been a success from the date of its incorporation, and the defenders have reaped large benefits therefrom. In payment of the purchase price of their business the whole of the ordinary shares were allotted to them, and the annual income from these shares is not less than £9600. The defenders, who are William, Walter, and Archibald Arrol, in their defences, explain that prior to November, 1893, the pursuer had been a customer of the defenders. In 1891 they appointed him their traveller or agent for the sale of beer to the military authorities at Sunderland and elsewhere, and in connection with these matters they had certain meetings with him from time to time. They deny they entered into any arrangement with him to float the company. They refuse to pay him the sum sued for. They plead that, as the pursuer's averments are unfounded in fact, they ought to be assoilzied."
Glasgow Herald - Wednesday 26 May 1897, page 9.

It sounds to me as if Mr. Key was just chancing his luck.His description as "brewers' agent and licensed victualler" - basically pub landlord - make him seem an unlikely choice to help in complex financial arrangements. The company's claim that he just sold their beer seems more plausible.

2.5% seems a big commission for nothing more than finding an accountant. Especially given the amount of money involved in the flotation. As the article indicates, that £11,250 was more than the directors earned annually from the company. I'm not surprised they didn't want to pay him it.

The claim that the brewery had only been making £1500 a year doesn't seem to tally with the figures in the prospectus. There it said that the profit was over £20,000 in 1894. But that wasn't the profit of just the brewery. It included Meikle and Turnbull's northeastern pub business. It sounds as if that was responsible for the bulk of those profits. Which wasn't made entirely clear in the prospectus.

We do learn the motivation for the flotation: to acquire a tied house estate. The standard reason for English breweries to go public. But not Scottish ones. Bizarre that they chose to build an estate in England rather than Scotland. Perhaps they were worried about losing their outlets there as English brewers bought pubs like crazy. 

Finally, the word "assoilzied". That's new to me. Sounds rather like a trouser accident. It was oddly disappointing to learn the true meaning: found innocent.

Saturday, 3 March 2012

Quick quiz

A very simple post today. What does this picture tell us?


If I'm feeling generous, there may even be a prize.

Friday, 2 March 2012

Arrol goes public

In the 1890's there was a rush of breweries converting themselves into limited companies. Looking at the details in the prospectuses, it's easy to see why they took such a step.

The standard trick was to divide the value of the company into two (often equal) parts. The preference shares which formed one half would be flogged to the public. The other part, the ordinary shares were kept by the directors. As only the ordinary shares had voting rights, the directors acquired a big wodge of cash but still kept control of the company. And in the good years of the 1890's, when brewers could make a 15%, 20% or even 25% return on capital, there was still plenty of profit left after distributing the fixed percentage (usually around 5%)  to the preference share holders.

Arrol's chose a more complicated structure, splitting the company three ways: preference shares, ordinary shares and debenture stock. That meant of the £450,000 the company was valued at, £350,000 came from external investors. Lucky directors. Though you'll learn later that things didn't quite work out as planned.


"The LIST will CLOSE on or before Tuesday for town, and noon on the following day for country.

ARCHIBALD ARROL & SONS LIMITED (With which is incorporated the business of Mr. John Meikle, of Newcastle-on-Tyne).

Debenture Stock £200,000
Share Capital £250,000

The First Mortgage Debenture Stock will be redeemable, at the Company's option, on or after the 1st July, 1915, at 110 per cent.

SHARE CAPITAL.
10,000 Ordinary Shares of £10 each £100,000
15,000 5.5 per cent Cumulative Preference Shares of £10 each 150,000

The vendors take the whole of the Ordinary Shares and one third of the Preference Shares in part payment of the purchase money.

The National Provincial Bank of England Limited, Bishopsgate-street, London, E.C., and Newcastle-on-Tyne, and the Commercial Bank of Scotland Limited, Glasgow, are authorised by the directors of the company to receive applications at the price of £104 per cent for £200,000 in Four-and-a-Half per Cent First Mortgage Debenture Stock, and at par for £100,000 in Five-and-a-Half per Cent Cumulative Preference Shares of £10 each, payable as follows :—



Debenture Stock. Preference Shares.
On Application £10 per cent £1 per Share.
„ Allotment 40 „  „ 4 „ ~ „
July 10th. 1895 54 „  „ 5 „

£104 £10

Trustees for the First Mortgage Debenture Stock.
Charles Harvey Combe, Esq., M.P. (of the firm of Combe and Co., limited, Brewers).
Sir John Nedson Cuthbertson (Director Extraordinary of the Commercial Bank of Scotland, Limited).
John Albert Black, Esq. (of the firm of John Black and Co., Shipowners), 26, Bothwell-street, Glasgow.

DIRECTORS.
William A. Arrol,             { Sole partners in the firm of
Walter Arrol,                   { Archibald Arrol & Sons,
Archibald Tower Arrol,    { Glasgow and Alloa.
John Meikle,         Newcastle-on-Tyne.

BANKERS.

The National Provincial Bank of England Limited, Bishopsgate-street, London, E.C., Newcastle - on - Tyne, and Branches.
The Commercial Bank of Scotland Limited, Glasgow, London, and Branches.

SOLICITORS.
Slaughter and May, 18, Austin Friars, London, E.C. McClure, Naysmith, and Co., Glasgow, N,B.

BROKERS.
Pimm, Vaughan, and Co., 1. Drapers' gardens, London, E.C.

AUDITORS.
Henry Graham, Smyrke, and Co., chartered accountants, Sunderland.

SECRETARY AND OFFICES.
C. J. Andrews, 18, Austin Friars, London, E.C. ; 14, Bigg Market, Newcastle-on-Tyne ; and 16, Dixon-street, Glasgow.

ABRIDGED PROSPECTUS.

This company has been formed to take over the well-known brewery business of Messrs. Archibald Arrol and Sons, which was established at Alloa in the year 1810, and to incorporate with it the business of Mr. John Meikle, of Newcastle-on-Tyne, and to acquire from him and from Mr. William Turnbull, of Noweastle-on-Tyne, 40 Freehold and Leasehold Hotels, Public-houses, and other Licensed Properties held therewith.

The Newcastle properties have recently been valued by Messrs. A. T. and E. A. Crow, valuers, of Sunderland, and Mr. Ralph Hindmarsh, valuer, of Newcastle-on-Tyne ; and the Scotch property by Messrs. Russell and Spence, of Glasgow, whose reports are embodied in the full prospectus.

The Mortgage Debenture Stock will be secured by a first mortgage on all the freehold and leasehold properties of the company, and generally on its business and undertaking.

The assets of the company comprise:—



£ s. d. £ s. d.
Freehold properties and fixed plant at Alloa and in and near Newcastle-on-Tyne, valued at 271,210 0 0
Copyhold and long leasehold premises and fixed plant. &c, in and near Newcastle-on-Tyne, valued at 33,150 6 0
Short leaseholds and fixed plant, valued at 6,640 0 0


311,000 0 0
Stock-in-trade, movable plant, casks, rolling stock, &c. guaranteed by the vendors at 56,364 0 0
Loans, book debts, &c, cash at bankers, and additional working capital, guaranteed by the vendors at 43,912 19 6


105,276 19 6
Total
£416,276 19 6 

Of the £311,000, a sum of less than £20,000 represents the value of fixed plant, and the directors are satisfied that the £105,276 19s. 6d. representing the working capital of the company is amply sufficient for the purpose.

The books of the firm have been examined by Messrs. Henry Graham, Smyrke, and Co., chartered accountants, of Sunderland, who report as follows:—

"We have examined the accounts of Messrs. Archibald Arrol and Sons, of Glasgow and Alloa, for the three years ending 30th June. 1894, and the accounts of Mr. John Meikle and of Mr. William Turnbull, both of Newcastle-on-Tyne, for the three years ending 31st December, 1894 (the dates at which the respective financial years end). And we hereby certify that the average annual profits for the period after excluding all charges for interest, but providing for depreciation, amounted to £20,135 2s. 3d., and that the last year's profits were £20,485 13s. 5d. We also certify that if during the above-named period the Scotch beers purchased annually by Mr. Meikle and Mr. Turnbull had been purchased from Messrs. Arrol, the average net profits would have been £26,883 18s. 3d. Pr annum. We further certify that we have examined the book debts, loans, and interest (including sundry investments at the price of the day) belonging to Messrs. Archibald Arrol and Sons, and after making ample allowances for possible losses and discounts we estimate them to be of the value of £38,912 19s. 6d."

The price to be paid by the company for the purchase of the whole of the above-named businesses, assets, and goodwill, the whole being taken over as a going concern as from June 1st, 1895. has been fixed by the vendors, Messrs. Archibald Arrol and Sons, at the sum of £458,000.

The terms of sale are embodied in three contracts. For details see full prospectus.

Full prospectuses and forms of application may be obtained at the company's office, and of the bankers, brokers, and solicitors."
Manchester Courier and Lancashire General Advertiser - Monday 27 May 1895, page 1.

There's a lot to consider in there. It's more complicated than the usual launch because two firms were being merged into one limited company: Archibald Arrol & Sons and John Meikle's Newcastle business.

The valuation is fascinating. Note the emphasis placed on the fixed plant being less than £20,000. Which means that the overwhelming majority of the £311,000 valuation for fixed plant and property was the latter. Presumably in the form of pubs. Because that was one of the points of the deal, to combine Meikle's pubs in the Northeast with Arrol's brewery..

As this makes clear: "We also certify that if during the above-named period the Scotch beers purchased annually by Mr. Meikle and Mr. Turnbull had been purchased from Messrs. Arrol, the average net profits would have been £26,883 18s. 3d. Pr annum." By supplying Arrol's beer to Meikle's pubs, profits would go up.Or at least that was the theory.

As you know, Scottish breweries didn't generally built up large estates of pubs, relying on free trade accounts. But in the 1890's, stuffed with cash from going public and seeing the number of licensed premises being driven down by a hostile licensing regime, English brewers had been buying pubs like crazy. This looks like a move by Arrol to hold onto their outlets in the Northeast. An area which had been a very good market for Scottish brewers.

Looking at the figures, there seems a problem to me. Average annual profits were around £20,000. On a capital of £408,000 that's only 4.9%. Even allowing for the greater profit from Arrol supplying the beer, the profit was just £26,883, or 6.4%. But the preference shares were a fixed 5.5% annually. That doesn't seem to leave much profit for the directors. Compared to other Scottish brewers like Tennent, the profits look quite poor in relation to the capital employed.

Smyrke - what a fitting name for an accountant. Remember that name. It will be coming up again soon.

Thursday, 1 March 2012

England vs Scotland, part 3d: early 1850's Extra Special Mild Ale

You must be getting used to this. A table of beer details and then me explaining why it proves Scottish and English brewing weren't really all that different.

It's still the early 1850's and we've still a way to go with just the Milds. This time it's what is now officially called (at least by me) Extra Special Mild. Or ESM for short. (Or Mild Ale between 1090º and 1099º.) You know, I keep making up these style names and throwing them around like balls of mud. Eventually one will stick. I'm sure of that. And why not Extra Special Mild? It makes a nice companion to Extra Special Bitter. If beer styles got married, ESM and ESB would be an obvious match. It certainly couldn't be Best Bitter and Extra Special Bitter. That would be incest.

Before a stumble too far from the path of coherence, here's the table:


England vs Scotland early 1850's Mild 1090º - 1099º
Date Year Brewer Beer OG FG ABV App. Atten-uation lbs hops/ qtr hops lb/brl boil time (hours) boil time (hours) boil time (hours) Pitch temp max. fer-ment-ation temp length of fer-ment-ation (days)
4th Oct 1850 Truman XX Ale 1093.1 9 4.34 59
2nd Oct 1850 Whitbread XXX 1094.7 1034.6 7.95 63.45% 7.87 3.24 1.17 2 2 60 76 6
15th Mar 1851 Truman XX Ale 1095.3 10 4.40
8th Oct 1850 Whitbread XXX 1095.8 1037.1 7.77 61.27% 7.85 3.34 2 2 2 60 76 5
21st Oct 1852 Reid XXX 1097.0 1025.8 9.42 73.43% 10.72 4.90 1.5 3 57 79 11
2nd Nov 1852 Reid XXX 1097.0 1024.9 9.53 74.29% 9.77 4.47 1.5 3 57 79 11
31st Aug 1853 Reid XXX 1097.0 1031.0 8.72 68.00% 10.24 4.71 2 3 56.5 78 12
25th Sep 1850 Whitbread XXX 1098.1 1029.1 9.12 70.34% 8.36 3.50 2 2 2 60 76 5
Average 1096.0 1030.4 8.75 68.46% 9.23 4.11 1.69 2.50 2.00 58.5 77.3 8.3
13th Oct 1851 Younger, Wm. 80/- 1090 1032 7.67 64.44% 5.00 2.08 1.25 1.5 56 70 9
6th Nov 1851 Younger, Wm. 80/- 1090 1034 7.41 62.22% 5.00 2.18 1.33 1.5 56 68 9
28th Nov 1851 Younger, Wm. 80/- 1090 1037 7.01 58.89% 5.00 2.26 1.25 1.5 56 68 8
2nd Mar 1852 Younger, Wm. 80/- 1090 1036 7.14 60.00% 5.00 2.21 1 1.25 56 67 8
20th Mar 1852 Younger, Wm. 80/- 1090 1036 7.14 60.00% 5.00 2.07 1.08 1.25 56 67 8
21st Oct 1851 Younger, Wm. 80/- 1091 1037 7.14 59.34% 5.00 2.21 1.25 1.5 56 68 9
27th Oct 1851 Younger, Wm. 80/- 1091 1037 7.14 59.34% 5.00 2.15 1.25 1.33 56 69 8
18th Nov 1851 Younger, Wm. 80/- 1092 1035 7.54 61.96% 5.00 2.34 1.33 1.5 56 68 9
9th Dec 1851 Younger, Wm. 80/- 1092 1038 7.14 58.70% 5.00 2.11 1.33 56 67 9
9th Nov 1853 Younger, Wm. 100/- 1092 1040 6.88 56.52% 4.50 2.14 1.25 56 68 8
28th Oct 1851 Younger, Wm. XXX 1092 1032 7.94 65.22% 14.59 5.53 1.33 54 69 9
24th Nov 1851 Younger, Wm. XXX 1093 1034 7.81 63.44% 10.00 4.32 1.33 56 67 9
14th Dec 1851 Younger, Wm. XXX 1095 1037 7.67 61.05% 17.94 5.50 1.25 54 68 9
10th Nov 1853 Younger, Wm. 100/- 1096 1040 7.41 58.33% 4.50 2.25 1.25 56 68 6
11th Apr 1853 Younger, Wm. 100/- 1097 1036 8.07 62.89% 10.00 6.05 1.5 57 69 8
Average 1092.1 1036.1 7.41 60.82% 7.10 3.03 1.26 1.41 0.00 55.8 68.1 8.4
difference -3.9 5.6 -1.34 -7.64% -2.13 -1.08 -0.43 -1.09 -2.00 -2.7 -9.3 0.1
Sources:
William Younger brewing record document number WY/6/1/2/5 held at the Scottish Brewing Archive
Whitbread brewing record document number LMA/4453/D/01/014 held at the London Metropolitan Archives
Truman brewing record document number B/THB/C/132 held at the London Metropolitan Archives
Reid brewing record document number 789/273 held at the Westminster City Archives


I'll be going through each point in the same order, yet again. I haven't the energy, nor the imagination, to think up an exciting new format each time. New crap jokes is about my limit.

Hopping rates. At first glance it looks clear: Younger's beers have about 1 pound, or about 25%, fewer hops. But take a closer look. The three most heavily hopped beers are all from Younger. And if you drop the 80/- Ales and only use the 100/- and XXX, the average hopping rate of Younger's beers is slightly higher, 4.3 pounds per barrel. That's so contradictory I can come to no conclusion at all. Except that Younger hopped their 100/- more heavily than their 80/-.

Boil times. This is one area where the results have been totally consistent. Once again, Younger's boils were shorter. 25 minutes less for the first wort and 65 minutes less for the second. You can't argue with that: in the early 1850's Younger's Extra Special Mild Ales had considerably shorter boils than equivalent London beers.

Younger's fermentation temperatures are again cooler. But the difference between the maximum fermentation temperatures and the pitching temperatures are quite wide apart. Younger's pitching temperatures were on average less than 3º F cooler. But the maximum is almost 10º F cooler. That's close to the difference often claimed. Take an average and you get: in the early 1850's Younger's Extra Special Mild Ales were fermented on average 6º F cooler than equivalent London beers.

I won't waste much time on the length of fermentation. The averages are near identical. Though there's wider variation amongst the London beers. That doesn't change my overall opinion: in the early 1850's Younger's Extra Special Mild Ales took about the same length of time to ferment as equivalent London beers.

Once again the apparent attenuation of Younger's beers barely reaches an average of 60%. While the London average is over 68%. Consequently it's no surprise that the ABV of Younger's beers is lower and the FG a good bit higher. Another easy one: in the early 1850's Younger's Extra Special Mild Ales were less attenuated than equivalent London beers.

You think this is getting tedious? We've still more than a century to go. Let's see who's left at the end.

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

Let's Brew Wednesday - 1914 Courage Imperial

A special Let's Brew today. Finally the 100% guaranteed, perfect, not-even-the-slightest-mistake version of Courage Imperial from 1914.

Imperial - now there's a name to conjure with. Several London brewers made one. Truman, Courage and, of course, Barclay Perkins. The latter was the most famous, nay legendary, version. They are all very much in the same mould: massive gravity, masses of hops. Sound very modern, don't they?

Courage's  Imperial, like so many others, was a casualty of WW I. It was last brewed in 1915. When peace returned and brewing restrictions lifted, Courage were left with just one Stout. At just 1044º, it was literally a shadow of their pre-war Stouts and 6º weaker than their Porter had been in 1914. You don't want to know how weak the Porter was after the war. Almost weak enough for the kiddies.






Not much to say today. I'll had you straight over to Kristen . . . .












Notes – Guys, here is the correct version of the 1914 Courage. The slight difference in numbers are only a result of a change in my calculations over time. Meaning the ones I use now are more correct than before but as you see, its only by a tiny margin. The yeast has change to the actual Courage yeast but feel free to keep the originally listed one if you wish. Sorry for the inconvenience.