Showing posts with label attenuation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label attenuation. Show all posts

Wednesday, 21 January 2015

German brewing in the 1970s – barley

We’re past the statistics and into the meat of this fact sandwich, starting to take a look at raw materials. Beginning with barley.

What barley varieties were being grown in the early 1970’s?

“Table VI gives analytical data for new German barley varieties of the 1974 crop. The Table also gives the areas of seed barley sown which indicates the amounts of the different barley varieties cultivated. The variety Villa has been widely distributed until recently but, giving only mediocre yields per acre, it is being replaced by the variety Carina, which was introduced in 1971. This latter variety also gives an inadequate yield and although it shows a very good extract yield and high a-amylase content it is expected to be replaced by the varieties Canova, Aramir and Adorra. Adorra has given the best yield of grain and a high extract yield (81.2%) by the EBC Congress Mashing Method.”
Journal of the Institute of Brewing, Volume 83, Issue 1, March-April 1977, page 73.

Here’s that first table:

TABLE VI. Analytical Quality of New German Spring Barley Varieties, 1974 Crop.
Variety Year of registration Extract %DM a-Amylase DM Diastatic power ºWK, DM) Yield* Seed area (ha)
Villa 1968 81.7 92 213 4 3,841
Carina 1971 83.0 104 228 5 3,007
Conova 1973 82.0 72 220 6 753
Hilde 1973 81.9 91 272 6 6
Aramir 1974 82.1 79 203 8 446
Adorra 1974 81.2 87 239 6 517
* Yield: 2 = very low, 8 = high.

The vast majority grown was just two varieties, Villa and Carina.

Recognise any of those names? I don’t. Because they’re completely different from the varieties grown a decade earlier:

Malting barley varieties in 1963
variety % of crop
Breun's Wisa 44.50%
Firlbeck's Union 14.00%
Ackermann Donaria 17.00%
Isaria 5.80%
Source:
Journal of the Institute of Brewing, Volume 72, Issue 1, January-February 1966, pages 14 - 15.

Even the varieties just being developed in the 1960’s had all disappeared: Heines Amsel, Ackermann's Bido, Breun's Nota and Breun's Volla. More evidence of how quickly barley varieties are adopted and discarded.

Time for some more details:

“Table VII gives further analyses of these new German spring barley varieties; results are the averages from seven different regions. Compared with other foreign varieties, malts of these barleys show excellent extract values. It is a pity that Congress worts of the variety Aramir are very dark in colour, even when kilned at temperatures of 80°C, due to its high content of proteolytic enzymes. It is likely, therefore, that Aramir will not find as wide a distribution as, for example, the new variety Canova. The fine-coarse difference indicates that the variety Canova also has a very high content of proteolytic enzymes. The Kolbach indexes of all varieties show excellent values but it should be noted that the malts were produced in a micromalting plant using a floor malting regime where no loss of green malt moisture occurs. The high enzyme content of the varieties Aramir and Villa can also be seen from their attenuation limit values. Overall these figures show how in the future barley varieties in Germany will be cultivated for extract yield and high enzyme content.”
Journal of the Institute of Brewing, Volume 83, Issue 1, March-April 1977, page 73.

A dark coloured malt wouldn’t be much use to you in Germany where most beer is very pale.

This is the accompanying table:

TABLE VII. Further Analyses of the New German Spring-Barley Varieties (1974 Crop).
Variety Villa Carina Canova Hilde Aramir Adorra
Extract (% DM) 81.7 83 82 81.9 82.1 81.2
Colour (°EBC) 3.1 2.9 3.7 3.1 4.9 3.0
Fine/Coarse-grind extract difference (DM. %) 1.4 1.6 1.0 1.9 1.4 1.9
Total protein (% DM) 10.2 9.2 9.0 9.8 9.9 9.1
Kolbach index (% DM) 45.3 44.9 48.3 47.3 53.8 45.4
Hartong 45ºC mash (% DM) 41.5 43.3 47.9 46.0 52.9 42.4
Apparent attenuation limit (%) 82.4 81.9 81.8 81.0 82.1 80.0

I’m not going to pretend that I understand all those numbers. But there is one I do and which may answer a question that’s been kicking around in my head for a while: why is the degree of attenuation of modern German beers so much higher than 100 years ago? It looks like my hunch of it being the malt could be correct.

The apparent attenuation limit looks close to the degree of attenuation of modern German Lagers. As German Lager is all-malt, attenuation can’t be boosted by the use of more readily fermentable adjuncts. Leaving the capacity of the malt as the limiting factor. Where can I get these sorts of analyses from the early 20th century?

Hops next time.

Saturday, 22 October 2011

Scottish fermentation in the 1850's

Time for some more extracts from William Stewart's rambling account to Scottish brewing practices. They must have been paying him by the word. He must have had the powers of concentration of a goldfish, judging by the way he jumps backwards and forwards between subjects. He could done with an editor.

"The degree of heat of the worts at which the yeast store is added, is of the utmost importance, as it regulates the time of the process of fermentation.

In the Scottish system of brewing, it ranges from 50° to 55°, according to the season of the year, or, more particularly, according to the existing state of the atmosphere. In the English system of quick fermentation, the range of heat is from 60° to 65°; in both cases being the best that can possibly be used for carrying through the respective processes, and obtaining the desired combination of alcohol and solution of starch-sugar to constitute strong ale."
"Brewing and distillation. With practical instructions for brewing porter and ales according to the English and Scottish methods by William Stewart" by Thomas Thomson and William Stewart, 1859, page 218.

Remember those temperatures for later. I'll be giving a test. No, we'll be looking at an example from the same period.

But first, some more from William Stewart:
"After the worts are pitched, and the yeast has struck, for the first ten or twelve hours a decided alteration takes place, and they are turbid and unsettled in appearance; and a scum of a greyish colour has gathered on the surface. In twelve hours more a white circle, narrow and regular, appears round the edge of the gyle, the surface begins to chip, and shew irregular patches of white breaking through; then these unite and shoot up in little pyramids,—a proof that the yeast is beginning to form on the surface, and that carbonic acid is escaping from the worts. This is the first stage of the fermentation, which the brewer looks upon as an assurance that his gyle is in a healthy state. The whole head of the worts is now covered with froth, which the brewer watches, and, as soon as he judges that the yeast is sufficiently formed, the head on the surface of the worts is beat down, and the process of fermentation allowed to go on for twenty-four hours.

At this part of the process, the Alloa district brewers have a method of quickening the fermentation, which is very serviceable. They prepare a half-fermented wort, which is termed fillings. Reserving half a hogshead from the coolers, they put this to quick fermentation at 62°, and by the second day of the gyle's age these fillings are ready. They throw into the gyle ten or twelve Scotch pints,— about five gallons English measure,—the effect of which is to make the fermentation lively and healthful. These fillings serve another purpose, for which they are chiefly intended. By the Alloa method of fermentation, the contents of the gyle, when finished,. are cleansed or run into butts, from which the ale is racked into casks as required, and the fillings are added, to preserve its keeping quality. This method, however, is incidental, as their chief markets for consumpt are too distant to admit of their following the Edinburgh mode of cleansing into barrels at once, and sending out to customers. The Alloa ale, from this cause, is liable to become a little hard. In my opinion, when judiciously ordered by the customer, and used in time, it is all the better for this. the Edinburgh ale being sometimes complained of as being rather soft; but this is no fault of the brewers, —their customers cannot endure the least taste of the bitter principle of hops. The Edinburgh trade, therefore, use particular care to extract the aroma, without permitting the bitter to be much infused, except in their summer keeping ale. When ale is exposed to heat, either in a warm apartment, or by a change from very cold to mild weather, the aroma of the hops held in it escapes, and, not having sufficient bitter for support, sometimes acquires a soft, weak taste. But brewers must study the public demand; and such occasional condition, even of the best kind, cannot be avoided."
"Brewing and distillation. With practical instructions for brewing porter and ales according to the English and Scottish methods by William Stewart" by Thomas Thomson and William Stewart, 1859, pages 220 - 222.
As soon as the yeast has formed a head, give the bastard a good beating. We've already learned that beating was intended to rouse the yeast and encourage fermentation. A bit like in a Yorkshire square. In Alloa they also added "fillings" (this has been mentioned a couple of times already) to speed up fermentation. You have to wonder why they didn't just let the wort warm up more is they wanted to hurry things up.

Handy things these fillings. Used to boost primary fermentation and to prime casks. How long did this practice continue? Did they switch to sugar primings later in the 19th century? I keep finding more questions.

As we'll see later, by the 1850's it was no longer totally true that Edinburgh brewers didn't ever cleanse in separate vessels.

There's another mention of Edinburgh brewers aiming for hop aroma rather than bitterness. It's certsainly true that William Younger went in for short boils in the first half of the 19th century. But that changed in the 1850's. During the course of the decade their boil times increased from an average of 60 to 70 minutes to between 90 and 105 minutes. The hopping rates of their weaker Shilling Ales increased, too. There will be loads more details of Younger's boiling and hopping in a future post. (When I've collected all the data.) Was the taste of Edinburgh punters changing or was more beer being sent elsewhere?

"There cannot be any rule established for beating in the yeast, sometimes it is requisite twice in one day, sometimes not for two days together; neither can time be fixed on to determine the duration of the process of fermentation. Much depends on the quality and quantity of yeast employed to commence the process, and the heat of the worts when set to ferment."
"Brewing and distillation. With practical instructions for brewing porter and ales according to the English and Scottish methods by William Stewart" by Thomas Thomson and William Stewart, 1859, page 223.

Beating down worts was popular in Scotland. William Younger certainly went in for it. I know. Let's have a look at some of their beats:



The large number in the "Heats and Beats" column is the wort temperature. The small number underneath the number of beats. The columns numbered 1 to 9 are the days after the start of fermentation. You can see that there was no beating until day 2 and little or no beating on the last day. Note that all the worts were pitched at 57º F - 2 degrees higher than the top of the range given by Stewart.

"To return to the process of fermentation of the brewing. Twenty-four hours after the head of yeast has been beat in the renewed yeast comes thicker to the surface of the worts, of a light cream-colour, and of a firmer appearance. The progress of the heat and attenuation, or resolution of the starch-sugar into alcohol, must be carefully ascertained. The increase of heat altogether, to the finishing of the ale, must not exceed 10° or 11°; but the attenuation required, being according to the future views of the brewer, cannot be fixed by any arbitrary rule. In the present case, 94 lbs. saccharine extract is the strength of the wort, and the attenuation required is, that it shall be carried down to 45 lbs. per barrel. The duration of the process, therefore, depends on regulating the heat until the attenuation is accomplished. The heat should advance progressively, and is either kept in check or encouraged by the use of the tube, which is fixed round the inside of the gyle, taking five or six turns from top to bottom, through which hot or cold water can be run at the pleasure of the brewer. In eight days the heat has increased 10º, and the attenuation, as indicated by the saccharometer, is down to 50 lbs. per barrel, the head of yeast on the worts having been plunged occasionally during that time.
"Brewing and distillation. With practical instructions for brewing porter and ales according to the English and Scottish methods by William Stewart" by Thomas Thomson and William Stewart, 1859, pages 222 - 223.

You can see from the Younger's record above that they let the temperature of some worts rise more than 11º F. In some cases it was as much as 16º F. Like boiling times, the pitching temperatures at William Younger increased as the 19th century progressed.  More about that later.

I've no idea what scale is being used for gravity measurements. Not that it matter much for the purposes of attenuation. I make 94 to 45 52.1% attenuation. Doesn't sound like much, but that's how the Scots liked their beers: thick and treacly. In the 1840's, Younger's Shilling Ales had between 50 and 60% apparent attenuation. By 1858 this had increased to 59 to 64%.

That tube he describes has a name: an attemperator. Don't know why he didn't call it that.

Tuesday, 3 July 2007

Stumbling around

I'll own up. I'm not as organised as I should be. On Sunday I wanted to write about rice beer. There was one problem: the marker had fallen out of "Zeitschrift für das gesammte Brauwesen".

I have a very simple system of keeping track of interesting tidbits of information in my books - paper bookmarks. Just pieces fo scrap paper, sometimes colour coded, sometimes with a little text scribbled on them. (I hope I'm not boring you. Skip a couple of paragrapghs. It might get better.)

Just when I needed to look it up, the one marking the article on malt substitutes in the Brausteuer Gebiet had gone walkies. As a result, I spent much of Sunday morning flicking through "Zeitschrift für das gesammte Brauwesen" looking for it. In the process I stumbled across a couple of other things I would like to share with you. Yes, they are numbers. How did you guess?

Austrian beer production
One difficulty when looking at statistics from before WW I is the way national borders have been moved around in the hundred or so years since. Austria is particularly tricky. Which is what makes the production figures on page 210 of the 1894 edition of “Zeitschrift für das gesammte Brauwesen”: they are broken down by state. Much more useful. It means I can (relatively) easily remove what no longer belongs. Let's see: Bosnia, is that part of Austria? No, I don't think so. Bascially all I need to do is strip out the bits that have recently had a civil war and hey presto, modern Austria. Or at least close enough.


While I was about it, I though that I may as well include the figures for the modern Czech Republic (Böhmen and Mähren in the table). It makes for some interesting (odd use of that word yet again) comparisons. You'll see that in in 1893 more than half of the beer produced in Austria came from what is now the Czech Republic. In fact 45% came from Bohemia alone. Secondly, whilst beer production increased 46% in present-day Austria between 1893 and 2005, in the Czech Republic it has gone up by 118%. Fascinating stuff. I could hardly sleep on Sunday night.

Attenuation in British beers in the 1890s
The next one is slightly odd. Why were the Germans so interested in the attenuation of British beers? No idea, though the article had been translated from English.

The tables do give an idea of the characteristics of typical British beers of the 1890s. Note that the Milds are stronger than all the Light Bitters and most of the Bitters. Mild didn't mean meek in those days.



Much has been said about the sweetness of 19th century Mild. I can't see any evidence for it in these figures: there is no appreciable difference in the degree of attenuation between Mild and the Bitters, nor is there a greater proportion of fermentable material left in it. But maybe I'm just looking at it the wrong way. Let me know if you can see something different.