Friday, 25 September 2026

Youngs PA adjuncts and sugars 1939 - 1945

A Young's London Special label featuring a drawing of the ram and the London skyline.
Now it’s time for the rest of the ingredients. Adjuncts and sugars first.

Before late 1941, there were no adjuncts.

Pre-war, there were no adjuncts in in the Pale Ale. The only adjunct Youngs employed was flaked oats in their Stout and Porter. That all changed in the war, when brewers were forced to use a percentage of flaked barley in their beers.

Kicking off in 1941, when the percentage was just under 5%. In 1942, this increased to 10%, around where it stayed, with a little variation, until the last year of the war when it jumped up to around 15%.

Sugar is a completely different matter. As every other English brewer, Youngs used sugar. And quite a bit of it in their Pale Ale. When the unpleasantness tarted, 14% of the grist was sugar. Which is pretty close to the UK average of 15%. 

In 1941, the sugar content dropped right down to 8.5%. Not really surprising as sugar was needed for purposes other than brewing. And it stayed at that reduced level right up until the last year of the war, when it returned to something like pre-war levels. Presumably because the supply of sugar had improved.

Very constant is the quantity of malt extract used. Around 3%. Why were they using malt extract? For the enzymes. UK brewers were paranoid about not having enough enzymes and were always looking for ways to top them up. Diastatic malt extract being a pretty obvious choice. One shared by quite a few other brewers. Youngs were still using malt extract in the 1970s.

Malt extract aside, there’s only really one type of sugar used: No. 1 invert. Which is exactly what you would expect in a top-of-the-range Pale Ale. The one exception being in May 1945 when there was a small amount of No. 3. Why? No fucking idea, to be honest. Maybe they were a little short of No. 1. 

Youngs PA adjuncts and sugars 1939 - 1945
Date Year flaked barley malt extract no. 1 sugar no. 3 sugar total sugar
27th Jul 1939   2.86% 11.43%   14.29%
22nd May 1940   2.86% 11.43%   14.29%
1st May 1941   2.84% 5.67%   8.51%
3rd Jul 1941   2.44% 6.10%   8.54%
8th Jul 1941   2.44% 6.10%   8.54%
23rd Oct 1941 4.23% 2.11% 7.04%   9.15%
7th May 1942 6.29% 2.80% 6.99%   9.79%
9th Jul 1942 4.20% 2.80% 6.99%   9.79%
20th Oct 1942 10.11% 3.37% 5.62%   8.99%
30th Apr 1943 13.33% 3.33% 6.67%   10.00%
20th Jul 1943 12.59% 2.80% 6.99%   9.79%
1st May 1944 10.00% 3.33% 6.67%   10.00%
8th May 1944 10.00% 3.33% 6.67%   10.00%
19th Oct 1944 10.49% 2.80% 6.99%   9.79%
8th May 1945 14.37% 2.99% 8.38% 2.40% 13.77%
3rd Jul 1945 17.14% 2.86% 11.43%   14.29%
12th Jul 1945 14.37% 2.99% 10.78%   13.77%
Sources:
Young's brewing records held at Battersea Library, document numbers YO/RE/1/8 YO/RE/1/9 YO/RE/1/10, YO/RE/1/11, YO/RE/1/12, YO/RE/1/13 and YO/RE/1/14.

 

 

Thursday, 24 September 2026

Youngs PA malts 1939 - 1945

A Young's Special label featuring a drawing of the ram.
And how did the recipe change over the war years? Well, let’s take a look. Starting with the malts.

In total, four malts were employed over the wartime years. But only one appeared in every iteration: PA malt. Though there were only a couple of times that it was the only malt.

The second most common malt is, a bit surprisingly, mild malt. I assume this was used because of supply difficulties. And mild malt happened to be what they had plenty of.

Other than in 1941, the grists were all over the place. With several different combinations of PA, mild and enzymic malt. It’s all very chaotic and a sign that they were having to make do with the malts that they could get hold of.

I’m guessing that, had it been available, they would have used enzymic malt all through the war. The patchy way it was used implies that the supply was somewhat irregular.

The percentage of malt is also all over the place. Starting the war at 86% and ending it at 63%. But, between those, it goes up and down quite a bit. Peaking at 91% in 1941. 

Youngs PA malts 1939 - 1945
Date Year pale malt PA malt mild malt enzymic malt total malt
27th Jul 1939 32.14% 50.36%   3.21% 85.71%
22nd May 1940 28.93% 53.57%   3.21% 85.71%
1st May 1941   88.30%   3.19% 91.49%
3rd Jul 1941   88.72%   2.74% 91.46%
8th Jul 1941   88.72%   2.74% 91.46%
23rd Oct 1941   36.97% 46.48% 3.17% 86.62%
7th May 1942 27.27% 56.64%     83.92%
9th Jul 1942   51.40% 31.47% 3.15% 86.01%
20th Oct 1942   33.71% 47.19%   80.90%
30th Apr 1943   76.67%     76.67%
20th Jul 1943   74.48%   3.15% 77.62%
1st May 1944   63.33% 16.67%   80.00%
8th May 1944   80.00%     80.00%
19th Oct 1944   41.96% 37.76%   79.72%
8th May 1945   53.89% 17.96%   71.86%
3rd Jul 1945   45.71% 22.86%   68.57%
12th Jul 1945   62.87%     62.87%
Sources:
Young's brewing records held at Battersea Library, document numbers YO/RE/1/8 YO/RE/1/9 YO/RE/1/10, YO/RE/1/11, YO/RE/1/12, YO/RE/1/13 and YO/RE/1/14.

 

Wednesday, 23 September 2026

Let's Brew Wednesday - 1909 Maclay DBS 54/-

A Maclay Brown Stout label featuring a drawing of thistles.

Now, Scottish Stouts could be pretty weird. Very weird, in fact. I’m looking at you William Younger, with your barely fermented spent hop Stouts.

This Stout is unusual for a couple of reasons. For a start, it’s incredibly weak from something claiming to be a Double Stout. Which I would expect to be around 1070º. The gravity here of just 1044º is pretty pathetic. That’s weak, even for a Porter. And, if it really wholesaled for 54/- a hogshead, that implies a gravity of at least 1050º.

The second area of oddness is in the grist. Which has 20% malted oats. For a beer that isn’t even billing itself as an Oat Stout. There’s a simple explanation for that: it was parti-gyled with their Oat Malt Stout.

In addition to pale and oat malt, there’s also black and amber malt. Rather a lot of black malt. Which is why the colour is so dark.

Lots of hops again. That seems to have been the Maclay way. Hallertau from the 1905, Hallertau and 1907 harvests; Californian from 1907, Farnham from 1908 and Worcester from 1905. 

 

1909 Maclay DBS 54/-
pale malt 5.25 lb 53.16%
black malt 1.00 lb 10.13%
amber malt 0.375 lb 3.80%
malted oats 2.00 lb 20.25%
No. 2 invert sugar 1.00 lb 10.13%
caramel 0.25 lb 2.53%
linseed 0.66 oz
liquorice 0.33 oz
Cluster 120 min 0.75 oz
Hallertau 60 min 0.75 oz
Goldings 30 min 1.50 oz
OG 1044
FG 1013
ABV 4.10
Apparent attenuation 70.45%
IBU 55
SRM 47
Mash at 144º F
after underlet 154º F
Sparge at 170º F
Boil time 120 minutes
pitching temp 60.75º F
Yeast WLP028 Edinburgh Ale

Tuesday, 22 September 2026

Youngs Pale Ale 1939 – 1945

A Youngs Pale Ale label featuring drawings of a ram and hop flowers.
In order to give some idea of what was going on in UK brewing during WW II, we'll take a look at a single beer, Youngs Pale Ale. And see what happened to it between 1939 and 1945.

In a way, it is totally typical of what went on in the war. Because the drop in gravity - just 5º over the whole period - is quite a bit less than usual. Though the gravity did fall lower: to 1039.7º in 1942. But, rather oddly, increased again early in 1943 to 1042.5º. And stayed at that level for the remainder of the war.

To make changes easier to spot, I’ve highlighted them in red

There are relatively few changes in gravity. But loads in the hopping rate. Which kicked off the war at 8 lbs per quarter (336 lbs) of malt. Dropping to 7 lbs in May 1940, then just over 5 lbs in May 1941 and 4.75 lbs in July of the same year. That’s quite a fall.

Though the rate did quickly bounce back to 5 lbs per quarter. Over the next couple of years the rate varied between 4.5 lbs and 6 lbs per quarter. Which I think is a reflection of variations in the supply of hops.

Youngs PA 1939 - 1945
Date Year OG FG ABV App. Atten-uation lbs hops/ qtr hops lb/brl
27th Jul 1939 1047.6 1013.3 4.54 72.09% 7.98 1.50
22nd May 1940 1047.0 1013.3 4.46 71.71% 7.00 1.29
1st May 1941 1043.0 1010.5 4.30 75.52% 5.14 0.83
3rd Jul 1941 1043.0 1008.3 4.59 80.67% 4.79 0.80
8th Jul 1941 1043.0 1010.0 4.37 76.81% 5.04 0.85
23rd Oct 1941 1042.4 1013.9 3.78 67.33% 5.09 0.85
7th May 1942 1040.0 1010.5 3.90 73.69% 4.48 0.72
9th Jul 1942 1039.7 1012.2 3.64 69.30% 5.46 0.87
20th Oct 1942 1039.9 1011.1 3.81 72.23% 4.52 0.73
30th Apr 1943 1042.5 1014.4 3.72 66.11% 4.89 0.82
20th Jul 1943 1042.3 1011.1 4.13 73.81% 5.46 0.95
1st May 1944 1042.5 1011.1 4.16 73.93% 5.56 0.93
8th May 1944 1042.7 1011.1 4.18 74.05% 6.00 0.99
19th Oct 1944 1042.8 1011.1 4.20 74.11% 5.46 0.93
8th May 1945 1042.8 1008.9 4.49 79.29% 5.41 0.94
3rd Jul 1945 1042.5 1011.1 4.16 73.93% 4.85 0.87
12th Jul 1945 1042.8 1011.1 4.20 74.11% 4.94 0.86
Sources:
Young's brewing records held at Battersea Library, document numbers YO/RE/1/8 YO/RE/1/9 YO/RE/1/10, YO/RE/1/11, YO/RE/1/12, YO/RE/1/13 and YO/RE/1/14.

 

Monday, 21 September 2026

Youngs boiling and fermentation in 1943

A Youngs Winter Warmer label with a drawing of a ram.
We’ll roll right along with a couple of processes.

Nothing much happening with the boil. Exactly the same as in 1940. Pretty boring, that.

The pitching and maximum fermentation temperatures are just about exactly the same as in 1940. Pitched at 58º F or 59º F and peaking in the high 60sº F. I suppose that they had no reason to change, so why would they?

Slightly longer fermentation times or around a day are a bit unexpected. I do need to point out here that they were quite variable, from five to nine days. When it comes to the fermentation times, the examples I have taken are pretty random. Well, totally random, really.

That's me done with Young's beers in 1943. Where should I go next? 1944 or straight to 1945? Or should I go backwards to 1941 0r 1942? I'll have to have a think. 

Youngs boiling and fermentation in 1943
Beer Style boil time (hours) Pitch temp max. ferment-ation temp length of fermen-tation (days) dropped after (hours)
A Mild 1.75 1.75 59º F 64.5º F 8  
X Mild 2 2 58º F 67º F 8 38
PAB Pale Ale 2 2 59º F 66.5º F 7  
PA Pale Ale 2 2 58º F 70.75º F 7 37
XXX Strong Ale 2 2 58º F 67.75º F 6  
  Average 1.95 1.95 58.40º F 67.30º F 7.2 37.5
Source:
Young's brewing record held at Battersea Library, document number YO/RE/1/12.

 

Sunday, 20 September 2026

Draught Bass Pale Ale 1869 - 1993

A Bass Pale Ale label with a red triangle.
I'm back with Draught Bass. This time looking at what it was like for more than a century.

Fortunately, I have plenty analyses of the beer. Thanks to its enormous popularity in the past. At the end of the 19th century, Bass in Burton was one of the largest breweries in the world. And Pale Ale was one of its main products. One of the classic IPAs, though Bass themselves never called it that. For them, it was simply Pale Ale.

We're only looking here at the draught version. Which was principally sold in the UK. With exports mostly in the form of the bottled version. Bass, along with Guinness, was one of the few beers which was sold in the tied houses of other brewers. And, unlike Guinness, it wasn't only in bottled form. The draught version appearing in some "foreign" tied houses.

Before WW I, Draught Bass had the classic Burton Pale Ale gravity of around 1065º. With a very high degree of attenuation leaving it getting on for 7% ABV. Why was the rate of attenuation so high? Because it was a Stock Pale Ale with a long secondary Brettanomyces fermentation.

After WW I, the gravity fell to around 1055º. Which is totally predictable. 1055º being the strongest draught beer got during the interwar period, Falling in with the gravity bands of the last set of price controls in the aftermath of WW I. It was the typical gravity of beers retailing for 8d per pint, which, as you can see, was the case here..

During WW II, the gravity held up surprisingly well, still being 1048 and over 5% ABV in 1944. During the 1950s, it stabilised at around 1045º. Where it remained, other than briefly rising to 1050º in 1965.

I'm quite surprised how much the colour jumped around. And how pale the colour sometimes was. 20 and below is definitely on the pale side for a Bitter. 

Draught Bass Pale Ale 1869 - 1993
Year Price per pint (d) OG FG ABV App. Atten-uation Acidity colour
1869   1065.9 1010.2 7.33 84.50% 0.17  
1869 4 1067.0 1013.2 6.81 80.31% 0.28  
1901   1064.0 1013.4 6.48 78.03% 0.144  
1927   1055.5          
1932   1054.7 1012 5.56 78.06% 0.05  
1937 8 1055.0          
1940 9 1051.6          
1943 14 1047.6 1008.9 5.04 81.30% 0.08 26
1944 16 1048.1 1008.2 5.20 82.95% 0.12 21
1950 18 1049.7         23
1951 19 1049.9 1008.8 5.36 82.36% 0.07 26
1952 19 1046.4         24
1953 19 1044.7         26
1954 19 1046 1008.7 4.86 81.09% 0.04 20
1957 21 1044.6 1005.4 5.12 87.89% 0.04 21
1960 21 1044 1009.8 4.45 77.73% 0.04 19
1965   1050.5 1009.4 5.36 81.39% 0.04 16
1977   1044          
1982   1044          
1989   1044 1010.1 4.40 77.05%    
1993   1043 1009.2 4.40 78.60%   19
Sources:
British Medical Journal August 28th 1869, page 245 
Wahl & Henius, pages 823-830
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001.
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/002.
Truman Gravity Book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number B/THB/C/252.
Good Beer Guide 1978
Good Beer Guide1983
Good Beer Guide 1990
1993 Real Ale Drinker's Almanac

 

Saturday, 19 September 2026

Let's Brew - 1941 Youngs XXX Ale

A Youngs Burton Strong Ale label featuring a drawing of a ram.
Youngs were still producing their standard-strength Burton XXX, though they had dropped the stronger XXXX.

The gravity isn’t quite as high as in 1939 – it’s 6º lower – but a higher degree of attenuation leaves the ABV a little greater. We’ve seen something similar with Youngs other beers.

The recipe has changed a bit since 1939. The pale malt has been replaced by more mild malt. And the crystal malt content has almost doubled at the expense of the No. 3 invert sugar.

A drop in the hopping rate from 7 lbs per quarter (336 lbs) of malt forces down the calculated bitterness from 33 IBU to 21 IBU. Which must have been way more noticeable than the fall in gravity.

The hops themselves were Worcester and East Kent, both from the 1940 season.

1941 Youngs XXX Ale
mild malt 9.00 lb 81.82%
crystal malt 120 L 1.25 lb 11.36%
malt extract 0.25 lb 2.27%
No. 3 invert sugar 0.40 lb 3.64%
caramel 1000 SRM 0.10 lb 0.91%
Fuggles 120 min 0.875 oz
Fuggles 30 min 0.875 oz
OG 1051
FG 1016.5
ABV 4.56
Apparent attenuation 67.65%
IBU 21
SRM 20
Mash at 151º F
Sparge at 170º F
Boil time 120 minutes
pitching temp 58º F
Yeast WLP002 English Ale

 

 

Friday, 18 September 2026

Youngs hops in 1943

A Youngs Brown Ale label with drawings of a ram and hop flowers.
A lack of excitement continues with the hops. Which are the same in every single beer. Just the two types, both from the 1942 harvest.  One Worcester, the other Mid-Kent “BG”. I’m guessing that stands for Brewer’s Gold.

What’s notable? All English hops and all from the most recent season. I think I can understand why. All English hops, because no hops had been imported since 1939. All from the most recent season because all the stocks of older hops had already been used up.

This demonstrates something about WW II brewing. UK brewers became almost totally dependent on UK-grown ingredients. Something which, WW I excepted, hadn't been the case since the first half of the 19th century. Though reductions in the strength and quantity of beer brewed after WW I, made the UK much less dependent on imported hops between the wars.

I hope you're enjoying all this stuff about Youngs during WW II. It's a preview of the book I'm writing about Youngs. Rather imaginatively called ""Youngs!". Who could have guessed that? 

Youngs hops in 1943
Beer Style hop 1 hop 2
A Mild Worcs. 1942 MK "BG" 1942
X Mild Worcs. 1942 MK "BG" 1942
PAB Pale Ale Worcs. 1942 MK "BG" 1942
PA Pale Ale Worcs. 1942 MK "BG" 1942
XXX Strong Ale Worcs. 1942 MK "BG" 1942
Source:
Young's brewing record held at Battersea Library, document number YO/RE/1/12.