Tuesday, 16 December 2025

Fremlin sugars in 1897

The sweet stuff now. Of which there are also quite a few different types. Four, to be exact.

A Fremlin's AK Ale label featuring a red elephant
Let’s start with No. 2 invert. Which in the individual brewing records is listed as “glucose”. But in the month totals is described as “Garton’e No. 2 invert”.  I suppose they were half right with glucose.

The proportion of No. 2 used is pretty high. Between 15% and 20%. That’s about as much as you ever see. What’s surprising, is that in most cases it’s combined with another sugar. One we’ll be looking at next, dectro-maltose.

More than half the beers also contain some of this sugar. All the Pales Ales, other than H, the weakest. Not being 100% fermentable, I always assume that it’s there to add body.

Something simply escribed as “cane” seems to operate in the place of No. 2 in some beers. I guess that it means some sort of raw cane sugar rather than pure sucrose.

The final type is caramel. Small quantities destined for the Black Beers, Porter, Cooper and Double Stout.

Between 20% and 25% is a lot of sugar. In everything other than the Pilsener. They sure did love their sugar.

Fremlin sugars in 1897
Beer Style no. 2 sugar cane dextro-maltose caramel total sugar
X Mild 23.53%       23.53%
H Pale Ale   22.00%     22.00%
BA Pale Ale   18.60% 4.65%   23.26%
BA C Pale Ale   15.69% 7.84%   23.53%
BA L Pale Ale 16.67%   8.33%   25.00%
BB Pale Ale 17.65%   5.88%   23.53%
BB L Pale Ale 16.67%   8.33%   25.00%
PA Pale Ale 15.69%   7.84%   23.53%
PA L Pale Ale 20.00%   8.00%   28.00%
IPA IPA 15.69%   7.84%   23.53%
Pilsener Pilsener         0.00%
P Porter   24.39%   2.44% 26.83%
Cooper Porter 24.49%     2.04% 26.53%
DS Stout   18.93%   1.18% 20.12%
Source:
Fremlin brewing record held at the Kent Archives, document number U3555/2/F/Bx2/1/22.


 


2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dextro-maltose is an interesting feature, but I guess it makes sense to prevent the beers from becoming thin during aging. If they were aged, that is?

Anonymous said...

There must certainly have been a noticable molasses character in all of those beers.

It seems reasonable to think that cane sugar would be a cheaper substitute for invert; is that reflected in the beer prices?