The proportion of No. 2 used is pretty high. Between 15% and 20%. That’s about as much as you ever see. What’s surprising, is that in most cases it’s combined with another sugar. One we’ll be looking at next, dectro-maltose.
More than half the beers also contain some of this sugar. All the Pales Ales, other than H, the weakest. Not being 100% fermentable, I always assume that it’s there to add body.
Something simply escribed as “cane” seems to operate in the place of No. 2 in some beers. I guess that it means some sort of raw cane sugar rather than pure sucrose.
The final type is caramel. Small quantities destined for the Black Beers, Porter, Cooper and Double Stout.
Between 20% and 25% is a lot of sugar. In everything other than the Pilsener. They sure did love their sugar.
| Fremlin sugars in 1897 | ||||||
| Beer | Style | no. 2 sugar | cane | dextro-maltose | caramel | total sugar |
| X | Mild | 23.53% | 23.53% | |||
| H | Pale Ale | 22.00% | 22.00% | |||
| BA | Pale Ale | 18.60% | 4.65% | 23.26% | ||
| BA C | Pale Ale | 15.69% | 7.84% | 23.53% | ||
| BA L | Pale Ale | 16.67% | 8.33% | 25.00% | ||
| BB | Pale Ale | 17.65% | 5.88% | 23.53% | ||
| BB L | Pale Ale | 16.67% | 8.33% | 25.00% | ||
| PA | Pale Ale | 15.69% | 7.84% | 23.53% | ||
| PA L | Pale Ale | 20.00% | 8.00% | 28.00% | ||
| IPA | IPA | 15.69% | 7.84% | 23.53% | ||
| Pilsener | Pilsener | 0.00% | ||||
| P | Porter | 24.39% | 2.44% | 26.83% | ||
| Cooper | Porter | 24.49% | 2.04% | 26.53% | ||
| DS | Stout | 18.93% | 1.18% | 20.12% | ||
| Source: | ||||||
| Fremlin brewing record held at the Kent Archives, document number U3555/2/F/Bx2/1/22. | ||||||


2 comments:
Dextro-maltose is an interesting feature, but I guess it makes sense to prevent the beers from becoming thin during aging. If they were aged, that is?
There must certainly have been a noticable molasses character in all of those beers.
It seems reasonable to think that cane sugar would be a cheaper substitute for invert; is that reflected in the beer prices?
Post a Comment