The degree of attenuation is even worse than for S2, at a good bit below 50%. All those residual sugars, along with the light hopping, must have resulted in a very sweet beer. I assume it must have been sold pretty soon after racking, as with all that sugar it can’t have been very stable.
Which leads onto the question: was this a draught or bottled beer? It was mostly racked into barrels and kilderkins, which implies to me that it was going to be sold on draught. But I could be wrong.
The grist is a bit more complicated than for S2. With a small percentage of glucose. And rather more black malt. Leaving the colour extremely dark.
The hops were the same as in S2: American from the 1884 and 1885 harvests, Kent from 1884 and Bohemian from 1885.
Definitely no ageing for this Stout.
| 1885 William Younger S1 Stout | ||
| pale malt | 14.50 lb | 85.29% |
| black malt | 1.75 lb | 10.29% |
| glucose | 0.75 lb | 4.41% |
| Cluster 120 min | 0.50 oz | |
| Cluster 60 min | 0.50 oz | |
| Fuggles 30 min | 0.25 oz | |
| Saaz 30 min | 0.25 oz | |
| OG | 1073 | |
| FG | 1041 | |
| ABV | 4.23 | |
| Apparent attenuation | 43.84% | |
| IBU | 22 | |
| SRM | 42 | |
| Mash at | 151º F | |
| Sparge at | 163º F | |
| Boil time | 120 minutes | |
| pitching temp | 57º F | |
| Yeast | WLP028 Edinburgh Ale | |

2 comments:
Why were they so sweet?
Oscar
That's what some of the punters wanted, obviously.
Post a Comment