Having obtained some fresh, juicy numbers, courtesy of Boak and Bailey, I thought I’d do something with them. As 1960 marks the end of the period I’m currently focussing on, it seems a good excuse to take a look at the state of British beer then.
Boak and Bailey’s data came from a Which? Report into beer from 1960. It’s hard to imagine how much in the dark drinkers were about the strength of the beer back then. Brewers were very secretive about how strong their beer was. With good reason. Their reflex reaction to tax increases had long been to cut gravities. By not telling their customers about gravities, they hoped they might not notice their beer was getting weaker.
This report and the occasional newspaper article were the only times beer strengths were ever detailed. I know kicking CAMRA is a modern sport, but it was they who dragged beer gravities out into the open. In the late 1970’s, as brewers wouldn’t say how strong their beers were, CAMRA had them analysed themselves. And published the results in the Good Beer Guide. Once the information was out in the open, some brewers started to publish their gravities. Eventually legislation obliged them to include it on beer labels.
But back in the dark days of 1970, the only way to get an idea of the strength of a beer was its name and price. Though those indicators weren’t 100% reliable. There are plenty of examples of Best Bitter in the tables below that aren’t very best. They range from 1032º to 1048º. As average gravity was around 1037º at this time, I would expect a Best Bitter to be stronger than that.
You’ll notice that several beers appear in both tables. I’m reassured that the prices mostly match, as do the gravities to within a few percentage points.
The bitterness number which appears in the Which? Table is something called “Index of Hop Bitter”. Not sure exactly what that is, but it doesn’t look far off an IBU number to me. Perhaps a touch lower. It amuses me that one of the beers with the highest bitterness is From William Younger, a Scottish brewery. Weren’t they supposed to use almost no hops in Scotland?
There’s a huge variation in value for money, as indicated by the final column, which gives the price in pennies of 1% ABV. I’m pleased to see that the winner of this particular race, by a whisker, is Carlisle State Management. A nationalised brewery. And it’s reassuring to see that by far the worst value for money is a keg beer, Flowers Bitter. You’ll note that the average price per % ABV is very similar for both tables, 4.21d and 4.22d.
That’s me done. I’ll leave you with the lovely tables.
Draught Bitter in 1960 | ||||||||
Brewer | Beer | Price per pint d | OG | FG | ABV | atten-uation | bitterness | price per % ABV |
Ansells | Bitter | 17 | 1045.3 | 1010.7 | 4.50 | 76.38% | 31 | 3.78 |
Worthington | "E" | 18 | 1041.8 | 1006.5 | 4.60 | 84.45% | 28 | 3.91 |
Bass | Red Triangle | 18 | 1043.1 | 1008.5 | 4.50 | 80.28% | 34 | 4.00 |
Carlisle State Management | Bitter | 14 | 1038.2 | 1008.2 | 3.90 | 78.53% | 28 | 3.59 |
Charrington | India Pale Ale | 19 | 1044.9 | 1013.25 | 4.10 | 70.49% | 37 | 4.63 |
Courage & Barclay | Bitter | 17 | 1040.3 | 1010.25 | 3.90 | 74.57% | 40 | 4.36 |
Flowers | Keg Bitter | 22 | 1039.1 | 1012.8 | 3.40 | 67.26% | 33 | 6.47 |
Fremlins | Best Bitter | 21 | 1044.7 | 1009.3 | 4.60 | 79.19% | 34 | 4.56 |
Friary Meux | Bitter | 13 | 1034.9 | 1007.2 | 3.60 | 79.37% | 28 | 3.61 |
Georges | Bitter | 13 | 1030.9 | 1004.75 | 3.40 | 84.63% | 24 | 3.82 |
Greenall Whitley | Bitter | 14 | 1034.4 | 1005.95 | 3.70 | 82.70% | 40 | 3.78 |
Greene King | Bitter | 15 | 1037.0 | 1006.25 | 4.00 | 83.11% | 33 | 3.75 |
Hammond United | Best Bitter | 16 | 1035.5 | 1004.05 | 4.10 | 88.59% | 20 | 3.90 |
Ind Coope | Bitter (BB) | 15 | 1037.7 | 1008.4 | 3.80 | 77.72% | 36 | 3.94 |
John Smiths | Best Bitter | 16 | 1036.8 | 1010.55 | 3.40 | 71.33% | 40 | 4.71 |
Tennant | Best Bitter | 16 | 1038.3 | 1006.05 | 4.20 | 84.20% | 30 | 3.81 |
Tennant | Queen's Ale | 18 | 1041.7 | 1008.6 | 4.30 | 79.38% | 35 | 4.18 |
Thwaites | Bitter | 16 | 1035.8 | 1006.6 | 3.80 | 81.56% | 32 | 4.21 |
Truman | Bitter | 16 | 1037.6 | 1007.6 | 3.90 | 79.79% | 30 | 4.10 |
Ushers | Bitter | 13 | 1031.9 | 1008.75 | 3.00 | 72.57% | 25 | 4.33 |
Vaux | Best Bitter | 15 | 1034.8 | 1005.6 | 3.80 | 83.91% | 22 | 3.95 |
Watney | Special Bitter | 19 | 1043.1 | 1014.5 | 3.70 | 66.36% | 33 | 5.14 |
Whitbread | Bitter | 17 | 1037.4 | 1009.65 | 3.60 | 74.20% | 35 | 4.72 |
Wilson | Bitter | 15 | 1036.1 | 1006.1 | 3.90 | 83.10% | 35 | 3.84 |
Younger, Wm. | Bitter | 18 | 1043.9 | 1010.8 | 4.30 | 75.40% | 40 | 4.19 |
Average | 16.44 | 1038.6 | 1008.4 | 3.92 | 78.36% | 32.12 | 4.21 | |
Source: | ||||||||
Which Beer Report, 1960, pages 171 - 173. |
Draught Bitter in 1960 | ||||||||
Brewer | Year | Price per pint d | OG | FG | ABV | atten-uation | Colour | price per % ABV |
Bass | Bitter | 21 | 1044 | 1009.8 | 4.45 | 77.73% | 19 | 4.72 |
Beasley | Bitter | 15 | 1034.3 | 1004.5 | 3.72 | 86.88% | 35 | 4.03 |
Blatch Brewery | Bitter | 14 | 1031.8 | 1003.9 | 3.49 | 87.74% | 20 | 4.01 |
Burt & Co. | Best Bitter | 13 | 1032.6 | 1004.5 | 3.51 | 86.20% | 20 | 3.70 |
Charles Wells | Bitter | 18 | 1034.4 | 1006.6 | 3.48 | 80.81% | 18 | 5.18 |
Charrington | Ordinary Bitter | 14 | 1033.8 | 1008 | 3.35 | 76.33% | 18 | 4.18 |
Charrington | Best Bitter | 19 | 1044.5 | 1012.9 | 4.10 | 71.01% | 24 | 4.64 |
Clinch | Bitter | 13 | 1034 | 1006.1 | 3.49 | 82.06% | 20 | 3.73 |
Courage & Barclay | Directors' Bitter | 24 | 1048.8 | 1008.4 | 5.27 | 82.79% | 26 | 4.56 |
Courage & Barclay | Bitter | 17 | 1040.4 | 1009.1 | 4.07 | 77.48% | 23 | 4.18 |
Courage & Barclay | Alton Pale Ale | 17 | 1040.4 | 1009.4 | 4.03 | 76.73% | 25 | 4.22 |
Dunmow Brewery | Bitter | 14 | 1033.6 | 1006.6 | 3.37 | 80.36% | 25 | 4.15 |
Flowers | Bitter | 19 | 1040.6 | 1008.8 | 3.97 | 78.33% | 24 | 4.78 |
Fremlin | XXX Bitter | 14 | 1035.5 | 1005.7 | 3.72 | 83.94% | 26 | 3.76 |
Friary | Bitter | 14 | 1033.8 | 1005.2 | 3.57 | 84.62% | 20 | 3.92 |
Friary Meux | Treble Gold | 18 | 1042.3 | 1008.9 | 4.18 | 78.96% | 23 | 4.31 |
Fullers | London Pride | 20 | 1042.3 | 1010.5 | 4.13 | 75.18% | 24 | 4.85 |
Fullers | Ordinary Bitter | 16 | 1032.2 | 1005.3 | 3.50 | 83.54% | 24 | 4.58 |
Garne & Sons | Best Bitter | 17 | 1042.9 | 1009.5 | 4.18 | 77.86% | 30 | 4.07 |
Garne & Sons | Bitter | 13 | 1031.2 | 1004.3 | 3.36 | 86.22% | 21 | 3.87 |
Gibbs Mew | Blue Keg Bitter | 18 | 1036 | 1007.6 | 3.55 | 78.89% | 25 | 5.07 |
Gray's | Bitter | 13 | 1033.6 | 1006.1 | 3.44 | 81.85% | 21 | 3.78 |
Greene King | Abbot Ale | 22 | 1051.3 | 1007.9 | 5.43 | 84.60% | 20 | 4.06 |
Greene King | Best Bitter | 15 | 1038.4 | 1007.4 | 3.88 | 80.73% | 20 | 3.87 |
Greene King | Ordinary Bitter | 13 | 1033.9 | 1005.7 | 3.53 | 83.19% | 26 | 3.69 |
Harvey's | Bitter | 14 | 1033.8 | 1006.1 | 3.46 | 81.95% | 22 | 4.04 |
Ind Coope | Double Diamond | 19 | 1040.2 | 1010 | 3.92 | 75.12% | 22 | 4.85 |
McMullen | Best Bitter | 16 | 1041.1 | 1010.8 | 3.79 | 73.72% | 25 | 4.22 |
McMullen | Ordinary Bitter | 15 | 1037 | 1008 | 3.63 | 78.38% | 22 | 4.14 |
Mew Langton | Best Bitter | 18 | 1037 | 1008.6 | 3.55 | 76.76% | 19 | 5.07 |
Morland | Bitter | 14 | 1035.6 | 1006.1 | 3.69 | 82.87% | 18 | 3.80 |
Morrell | Best Bitter | 15 | 1035.3 | 1005.3 | 3.75 | 84.99% | 23 | 4.00 |
Morrell | Light Bitter | 12 | 1030.7 | 1005 | 3.21 | 83.71% | 17 | 3.74 |
Rayments | Best Bitter | 14 | 1035.7 | 1006.4 | 3.66 | 82.07% | 22 | 3.82 |
Rayments | Bitter | 12 | 1030.3 | 1004.1 | 3.27 | 86.47% | 18 | 3.66 |
Ridley | Best Bitter | 21 | 1047 | 1007.8 | 4.90 | 83.40% | 22 | 4.29 |
Ridley | Ordinary Bitter | 14 | 1034.2 | 1009.8 | 3.05 | 71.35% | 19 | 4.59 |
Simonds | Best Bitter | 19 | 1042.3 | 1007.5 | 4.35 | 82.27% | 17 | 4.37 |
Simpson & Co. | Bitter | 15 | 1036.2 | 1008 | 3.53 | 77.90% | 24 | 4.26 |
Star Brewery | SPA | 17 | 1039.5 | 1005.8 | 4.21 | 85.32% | 22 | 4.04 |
Star Brewery | Bitter | 12 | 1029.5 | 1003.3 | 3.28 | 88.81% | 20 | 3.66 |
Tamplin | Bitter | 14 | 1034.3 | 1006 | 3.54 | 82.51% | 24 | 3.96 |
Tetley | Bitter | 16 | 1037.9 | 1003.7 | 4.28 | 90.24% | 20 | 3.74 |
Tollemache | Bitter | 16 | 1033.3 | 1003.4 | 3.74 | 89.79% | 20 | 4.28 |
Truman | Best Burton Bitter | 18 | 1042.7 | 1009.7 | 4.29 | 77.28% | 19 | 4.20 |
Truman | Ordinary Burton Bitter | 16 | 1037.4 | 1007.6 | 3.87 | 79.68% | 20 | 4.13 |
Usher | Ordinary Bitter | 13 | 1032.5 | 1007.3 | 3.15 | 77.54% | 18 | 4.13 |
Usher, Trowbridge | Best Bitter | 18 | 1043.6 | 1010 | 4.20 | 77.06% | 21 | 4.29 |
Watney | Special Bitter | 19 | 1044.2 | 1009.6 | 4.50 | 78.28% | 26 | 4.22 |
Wells & Winch | Bitter | 16 | 1036 | 1010.3 | 3.21 | 71.39% | 12 | 4.98 |
Wenlock | Bitter | 16 | 1035 | 1008.7 | 3.41 | 75.14% | 26 | 4.69 |
Whitbread | Bitter | 17 | 1038.5 | 1011 | 3.56 | 71.43% | 20 | 4.77 |
Young & Co | Best Bitter | 20 | 1048.4 | 1011.5 | 4.61 | 76.24% | 24 | 4.34 |
Young & Co | Ordinary Bitter | 15 | 1037.5 | 1006.6 | 3.86 | 82.40% | 19 | 3.88 |
Average | 16.15 | 1037.7 | 1007.4 | 3.818 | 80.52% | 21.81 | 4.22 | |
Source: | ||||||||
Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/002. |
I’ve a few other types of beer to plough through. Unless I get distracted.
"State Management Scheme" - sends a shiver down the spine
ReplyDeleteJeff,
ReplyDeletebut it seems to have worked well. Note their beer is some of the best value.
Not good value if it were state subsidised, though: taxpayer money will have funded those cheaper pints, and no profit going back to shareholders to the benefit of the wider economy.
DeleteI waas hoping to see some regional consistency in the bittering levels, but while the two West Country beers, Georges and Ushers, are low in bitterness, as I'd expected to find, Hammonds, from Yorkshire is also low, and particularly when compared with its fellow Yorkshire brewers. The London brewers seem to be mostly fairly high in bitterness, but there appears to be little geogrphical correolation generally.
ReplyDeleteMartyn,
ReplyDeletethat's exactly what I'd noticed. Though a larger sample size might have revealed more.
Jeff,
ReplyDeleteI don't believe for a moment that their beer was subsidised by taxpayers. They seem to have been well run. They were big on "improved" pubs and their estate generally had good amenities.
I wonder if the state subsidises Weihenstephaner?
I don't think there was sufficient clarity on what was truly subject to effective or actual subsidy and what wasn't back then - nobody really worked it out as preference for private or public ownership was ideological on both sides - it cut both ways.
ReplyDelete