After all, what could be more fascinating than a load of numbers about malt and adjunct usage? Well, I find it fascinating. You can bugger off if you disagree.
I’ll start with the numbers. You’ll have to admit, they are an impressive-looking bunch.
Brewing materials 1945 - 1960 (cwt) | |||||||||
year | malt | unmalted corn | rice, maize, etc | sugar | total malt & adjuncts | hops | prepar-ations of hops | hop substi-tutes | bulk barrels |
1945 | 10,435,212 | 245,751 | 1,332,032 | 1,784,064 | 13,797,059 | 244,822 | 714 | 139 | 31,990,334 |
1946 | 9,976,998 | 137,750 | 1,132,748 | 1,790,021 | 13,037,517 | 226,197 | 1,414 | 168 | 31,066,950 |
1947 | 9,454,253 | 92,974 | 614,335 | 1,601,186 | 11,762,748 | 217,759 | 1,423 | 191 | 30,103,180 |
1948 | 9,499,794 | 69,939 | 606,881 | 1,443,558 | 11,620,172 | 231,470 | 630 | 547 | 28,813,725 |
1949 | 9,087,351 | 60,709 | 505,071 | 1,303,212 | 10,956,343 | 233,158 | 164 | 74 | 26,744,457 |
1950 | 9,094,097 | 56,174 | 454,500 | 1,285,877 | 10,890,648 | 232,979 | 114 | 90 | 25,339,062 |
1951 | 9,282,152 | 57,681 | 452,581 | 1,355,152 | 11,147,566 | 229,106 | 178 | 82 | 24,870,564 |
1952 | 9,312,437 | 51,992 | 467,189 | 1,385,836 | 11,217,454 | 228,512 | 114 | 177 | 25,285,589 |
1953 | 9,085,688 | 58,012 | 426,396 | 1,405,154 | 10,975,250 | 225,569 | 335 | 222 | 24,789,130 |
1954 | 8,629,252 | 52,219 | 462,005 | 1,484,605 | 10,628,081 | 216,841 | 286 | 188 | 24,153,387 |
1955 | 8,635,522 | 46,556 | 478,150 | 1,529,256 | 10,689,484 | 217,716 | 92 | 27 | 24,324,623 |
1956 | 8,630,145 | 40,038 | 486,838 | 1,544,258 | 10,701,279 | 218,820 | 110 | 42 | 24,187,096 |
1957 | 8,872,468 | 13,834 | 532,214 | 1,564,673 | 10,983,189 | 215,114 | 91 | 28 | 24,839,755 |
1958 | 8,642,500 | 10,717 | 543,467 | 1,527,997 | 10,724,681 | 208,870 | 102 | 24 | 24,129,462 |
1959 | 8,885,364 | 8,007 | 590,006 | 1,569,002 | 11,052,379 | 216,037 | 107 | 29 | 25,023,044 |
1960 | 9,406,860 | 8,994 | 573,252 | 1,650,843 | 11,639,949 | 226,371 | 111 | 24 | 26,313,796 |
Sources: | |||||||||
Brewers' Almanack 1955, page 62. | |||||||||
1971 Brewers' Almanack, page 54. |
You can see that while the use of unmalted adjuncts declined steeply after the war, the amount of sugar used was more stable. There’s a simple enough explanation. Brewers were forced by the government to use flaked barley during the latter war years. The idea being that flaking consumed less energy than malting. While brewers had a limit on the amount of sugar they could use in wartime, when they would have preferred to use more.
The quantity of hops used was very stable in the 1950’s, despite beer production falling.
It’s hard to make too much sense of those numbers. Far easier if you look at percentages rather than absolute numbers. Which is why I’ve derived this table:
Brewing materials 1945 - 1960 (%) | ||||||
year | malt | unmalted corn | rice, maize, etc | sugar | lbs hops per barrel | lbs hops per quarter |
1945 | 75.63% | 1.78% | 9.65% | 12.93% | 0.86 | 5.96 |
1946 | 76.53% | 1.06% | 8.69% | 13.73% | 0.82 | 5.83 |
1947 | 80.37% | 0.79% | 5.22% | 13.61% | 0.81 | 6.22 |
1948 | 81.75% | 0.60% | 5.22% | 12.42% | 0.90 | 6.69 |
1949 | 82.94% | 0.55% | 4.61% | 11.89% | 0.98 | 7.15 |
1950 | 83.50% | 0.52% | 4.17% | 11.81% | 1.03 | 7.19 |
1951 | 83.27% | 0.52% | 4.06% | 12.16% | 1.03 | 6.91 |
1952 | 83.02% | 0.46% | 4.16% | 12.35% | 1.01 | 6.84 |
1953 | 82.78% | 0.53% | 3.89% | 12.80% | 1.02 | 6.91 |
1954 | 81.19% | 0.49% | 4.35% | 13.97% | 1.01 | 6.86 |
1955 | 80.79% | 0.44% | 4.47% | 14.31% | 1.00 | 6.84 |
1956 | 80.65% | 0.37% | 4.55% | 14.43% | 1.01 | 6.87 |
1957 | 80.78% | 0.13% | 4.85% | 14.25% | 0.97 | 6.58 |
1958 | 80.59% | 0.10% | 5.07% | 14.25% | 0.97 | 6.54 |
1959 | 80.39% | 0.07% | 5.34% | 14.20% | 0.97 | 6.57 |
1960 | 80.82% | 0.08% | 4.92% | 14.18% | 0.96 | 6.53 |
Sources: | ||||||
Brewers' Almanack 1955, page 62. | ||||||
1971 Brewers' Almanack, page 54. |
You can see the trends much more clearly in that form. Malt usage increased from 75% to a peak of 83.5% in 1950, then slowly fell back down to 80%. While unmalted corn all but disappears. Maize and rice usage dropped quickly after the end of the war then plateaued at around 5%.
The fall in the proportion of sugar used in 1949 and 1950 probably wasn’t voluntary, but as a result of government restrictions. Pre-war, it clocked in around 15% and you can see that when brewers were free to use as much as they liked in the later 1950’s, it returned to around that level.
The rise in hopping levels after 1947 is partly because of an increase in average gravity, though not totally, as the hopping rate per quarter of malt tells us. There was an increase of more than 1 lb per quarter between 1945 and 1950, after which it declined but still remained above the 1945 level.
The 1960 numbers – 80% malt, 5% adjuncts, 15% sugar, 1 lb hops per barrel – do look like a typical late 1950’s beer’s ingredients.
5 comments:
What's the difference between "unmalted corn" and maize?
Gus,
by unmalted corn I'm pretty sure they mean flaked barley and flaked oats. I.e. grains that might well have been malted. Unlike maize and rice which weren't malted in the UK.
Corn was in past most often used to mean wheat.
From Wikipedia:
"Corn" included any grain that requires grinding, especially wheat.
Any idea what the "hop substitutes" were?
Dan Wells,
not off the top of my head,
Post a Comment