I had been contemplating writing about how little roast barley was used in Ireland. Outside Guinness, of course. Until I came across a note of materials used at the bottom of one page. Which included a column or roast barley.
This is the problem of getting ingredients hard-coded in the pre-printed brewing records. Cairnes records two ingredients so listed: BPG (Beane’s Patent Grist) and patent malt. BPG was dropped before WW I, being replaced by “flakes”. Which I’m guessing were flaked maize, but which could have been rice. And, at some point, patent malt was replaced by roast barley. It’s just impossible to see when.
Other than the roast barley, there are just two other elements to the grist: pale malt and caramel. Interestingly, no other sugar and no adjuncts. It’s far simpler than a London Porter recipe.
Three types of English hops, all from the 1921 harvest.
1923 Cairnes Single Stout | ||
pale malt | 8.75 lb | 90.21% |
roast barley | 0.75 lb | 7.73% |
caramel 2000 SRM | 0.20 lb | 2.06% |
Fuggles 120 mins | 0.75 oz | |
Fuggles 60 mins | 0.75 oz | |
Goldings 30 mins | 0.75 oz | |
OG | 1042 | |
FG | 1014 | |
ABV | 3.70 | |
Apparent attenuation | 66.67% | |
IBU | 33 | |
SRM | 33 | |
Mash at | 155º F | |
Sparge at | 170º F | |
Boil time | 120 minutes | |
pitching temp | 58.25º F | |
Yeast | Wyeast 1084 Irish ale |
My understanding is that Porter is the actual style , when a brewer created a stronger version it was a Stout Porter. People , being lazy , simply called it Stout.
ReplyDeleteI seem to recollect in one of your earlier articles that following the Snowden acts many brewers stopped brewing their Stouts , kept on brewing Porter but stuck a Stout label on it.
Perhaps this is why Porter seemed to disappear in the UK.
Interesting how in a quarter of a century or thereabout the strength has fallen by 1.9 percent.
ReplyDeleteOscar
Could you explain why it looks more like a porter than a stout? I know the meaning of stout changed over time, but I'm never able to keep clear how the concepts applied in different eras.
ReplyDeleteIf there was a legal definition of 'stout' I'm sure there would be grounds to prosecute Guinness
ReplyDeleteAnonymous,
ReplyDeleteI'm basing it purely on the strength.