This could easily have been called as Table Beer. And might well have been a couple of decades before. But, along with the tax category, the term itself had become obsolete. How was this drunk? Probably with food. At home.
It’s a very simple recipe of just pale malt and sugar. An undefined type of sugar. No. 2 invert is just my conservative guess.
Most off the hops are Californian. With 20% from Alsace. From the 1883 and 1884 harvests, respectively. The dry hops are my guess.
1885 Thomas Usher 40/- B | ||
pale malt | 5.75 lb | 88.46% |
No. 2 invert sugar | 0.75 lb | 11.54% |
Cluster 120 min | 0.75 oz | |
Cluster 30 min | 0.25 oz | |
Strisselspalt 30 min | 0.25 oz | |
Goldings dry hops | 0.25 oz | |
OG | 1030 | |
FG | 1011 | |
ABV | 2.51 | |
Apparent attenuation | 63.33% | |
IBU | 25 | |
SRM | 5 | |
Mash at | 148º F | |
Sparge at | 175º F | |
Boil time | 120 minutes | |
pitching temp | 57.5º F | |
Yeast | WLP028 Edinburgh Ale |
Did not know beers as weak as 2.5 percent were being made in the 1890’s.
ReplyDeleteOscar
Looks like a pretty flavorful, well hopped beer for only 2.5 %
ReplyDeleteYou could wean babies on that stuff
ReplyDelete