Main difference with the 1879 recipe is the presence of something called “colour”. Which I’m taking to mean a caramel of some sort. A bit tricky to work out the quantity, as it’s listed in pints rather than pounds. Or to know exactly what shade it was. Guesses all around, then.
While we’re on the topic of guesses, the brewing records don’t include FG’s or boil times. Though, oddly, they do specify when a copper sample was taken. After two hours for this brew. Meaning the boil time must have been, at least, 120 minutes.
Three types of hops: Worcester, Kent and Burgundy. No real clue what variety the last might have been. I’ve gone with the only French-grown type I know. Could me miles off there. But, as the quantity is small and I’ve put it at the start of the boil, it will probably have a negligible effect on the flavour.
Returning to guesses, one to two years conditioning in oak is what I’d plump for. Along with Brettanomyces, obviously.
1890 Adnams Tally Ho | ||
pale malt | 13.00 lb | 76.11% |
No. 2 invert sugar | 4.00 lb | 23.42% |
caramel 1000 SRM | 0.08 lb | 0.47% |
Fuggles 120 mins | 3.75 oz | |
Strisslespalt 120 mins | 1.25 oz | |
Goldings 30 mins | 4.50 oz | |
OG | 1086 | |
FG | 1024 | |
ABV | 8.2 | |
Apparent attenuation | 69.66% | |
IBU | 88 | |
SRM | 18 | |
Mash at | 153º F | |
Sparge at | 165º F | |
Boil time | 120 minutes | |
pitching temp | 57º F | |
Yeast | WLP025 Southwold |
My sister and brother in law went on holiday to Suffolk last summer and brought me back some bottles of Tally Ho. He said that Adnams seemed to own every pub in that area, and the brewery shop and visitor centre was also very busy, so it's a bit concerning to read that they now seem to have hit financial difficulties.
ReplyDeleteAgreed especially since they are a family owned regional.
DeleteOscar
I think if you're pub-led these days you are in a death spiral
ReplyDeleteThen Bathams is probably next.
DeleteOscar