This period is quite confusing with regard to Mild Ale. Brewers continuing to produce Shilling Ales – which were mostly the equivalent of English Mild Ales – but also made beers which were specifically called Mild Ale or designated by X’s as Mild Ales were in England.
William Younger further muddied the waters by giving the same beer an X designation when intended to be sold on draught and a shilling designation when destined for bottling. It’s taken me several years of study to get my head around and I still sometimes get confused.
For comparison purposes, I've also included a table of London Milds from the end of the 19th century and early 20th century.
General trends seem to be William Younger’s Mild Ales becoming less heavily hopped and lower gravity than equivalent London beers. A similar trend of a fall in hopping rate can also be seen in London. Whitbread and Truman’s hopping declined from over 7 lbs per quarter in 1885 to around 5 lbs, while Fuller’s fell from 6.5 lbs to 5 lbs. Only Barclay Perkins had a pretty much unchanged hopping.
Note that the stronger Milds had all disappeared in London by 1914. X Ale reigned supreme in the capital.
William Younger Mild Ales 1885 - 1913 | ||||||||
Year | Beer | Style | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl |
1885 | X | Mild | 1048 | 1009 | 5.16 | 81.25% | 5.29 | 0.99 |
1885 | XX | Mild | 1056 | 1012 | 5.82 | 78.57% | 6.19 | 1.53 |
1885 | XXX | Mild | 1065 | 1021 | 5.82 | 67.69% | 6.67 | 1.86 |
1898 | XX | Mild | 1061 | 1016 | 5.95 | 73.77% | 5.45 | 1.50 |
1898 | XXX | Mild | 1074 | 1018 | 7.41 | 75.68% | 8.81 | 2.74 |
1913 | XX - X | Mild | 1055 | 1017 | 5.03 | 69.09% | 4.07 | 0.88 |
1913 | XX | Mild | 1055 | 1018 | 4.89 | 67.27% | 4.07 | 0.87 |
1913 | XXK | Mild | 1056 | 1016 | 5.29 | 71.43% | 4.07 | 0.81 |
1913 | XXX | Mild | 1065 | 1021.5 | 5.75 | 66.92% | 4.55 | 1.15 |
Source: | ||||||||
William Younger brewing records held at the Scottish Brewing Archive, document numbers WY/6/1/2/31, WY/6/1/2/45 and WY/6/1/2/58. |
London Mild Ales 1885 - 1912 | ||||||||
Year | Brewer | Beer | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl |
1885 | Truman | X Ale | 1059.0 | 7.3 | 1.87 | |||
1885 | Whitbread | X | 1059.6 | 1015.0 | 5.90 | 74.88% | 7.49 | 1.90 |
1886 | Barclay Perkins | X | 1055.0 | 1010.0 | 5.96 | 81.87% | 6.42 | 1.61 |
1886 | Barclay Perkins | XX | 1076.0 | 1022.7 | 7.05 | 70.11% | 12.00 | 3.86 |
1887 | Fuller | X | 1050.7 | 1013.6 | 4.91 | 73.22% | 6.64 | 1.41 |
1887 | Fuller | XX | 1064.8 | 1023.3 | 5.50 | 64.10% | 6.64 | 1.93 |
1891 | Barclay Perkins | X | 1058.0 | 1015.0 | 5.69 | 74.21% | 8.32 | 2.07 |
1894 | Truman | X Ale | 1056.5 | 9.0 | 2.19 | |||
1894 | Whitbread | X | 1058.4 | 1016.0 | 5.62 | 72.62% | 8.23 | 2.09 |
1897 | Fuller | X | 1049.6 | 1012.2 | 4.95 | 75.42% | 6.58 | 1.44 |
1909 | Barclay Perkins | X | 1053.6 | 1013.9 | 5.26 | 74.16% | 7.49 | 1.62 |
1909 | Truman | X Ale | 1056.8 | 5.8 | 1.41 | |||
1910 | Fuller | X | 1052.6 | 1014.7 | 5.01 | 72.08% | 5.2 | 1.21 |
1912 | Whitbread | X | 1054.0 | 1012.0 | 5.56 | 77.78% | 4.49 | 1.05 |
Sources: | ||||||||
Barclay Perkins brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numbers ACC/2305/1/584, ACC/2305/1/587 and ACC/2305/1/601 | ||||||||
Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numbers LMA/4453/D/01/051, LMA/4453/D/01/060 and LMA/4453/D/01/077. | ||||||||
Truman brewing record held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number B/THB/C/166, B/THB/C/175 and B/THB/C/190. | ||||||||
Fullers brewing records held at the brewery. |
The above is an excerpt from my excellent book on Scottish brewing:
Which is also available in Kindle form:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07Q8XHBL2
Just a thought, could the lower hopping rate be the result of higher alpha acid in the hops?
ReplyDeleteWhy would Younger’s have higher alpha hops than anyone else?
ReplyDeleteOK, I misunderstood that comment, soz. You mean it was a general trend rather than something specific to Wm Younger. In that case, I think it’s unlikely because as far as I am aware high-alpha hops are a pretty recent thing, since the 1960s at the earliest. Much more likely they were just responding to changing tastes, or, even more likely, trying to save money.
ReplyDelete