The strongest is 7.58% ABV - well short of the strong IPAs, whether that Lancet article is listing ABV or ABW. They average out to around 1065º and just under 7% ABV. Which is exactly what I would have expected. 1065º was the classic OG for Burton-brewed IPA.
I.m at a total loss as to how to explain those two strong IPAs. They are very different to any 19th-century IPA that I've seen. It leaves me wondering if they've been misidentified and are actually Burton Ales rather than Pale Ales. Though The Lancet is a pretty reliable source so I'm disinclined to believe that.
Let me know if you have any ideas.
Bass and Allsopp IPA 1851 - 1901 | ||||||
Year | Brewer | Beer | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation |
1851 | Allsopp | Export IPA | 1057.1 | 1009 | 6.32 | 84.59% |
1851 | Allsopp | Export IPA | 1060.8 | 1009 | 6.84 | 85.86% |
1869 | Allsopp | Pale Ale | 1064.2 | 1010 | 7.18 | 83.82% |
1869 | Allsopp | Pale Ale | 1068.5 | 1013 | 7.19 | 80.32% |
1901 | Allsopp | India Pale Ale, Red Hand | 1061.6 | 1009 | 6.80 | 85.27% |
1851 | Bass | Domestic IPA | 1064.0 | 1013 | 6.69 | 80.00% |
1852 | Bass | Domestic IPA | 1073.7 | 1019 | 7.11 | 73.95% |
1862 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1067.8 | 1014 | 7.04 | 78.91% |
1862 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1069.0 | 1017 | 6.80 | 75.07% |
1862 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1069.5 | 1017 | 6.91 | 75.68% |
1862 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1063.2 | 1012 | 6.69 | 80.38% |
1862 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1066.9 | 1016 | 6.74 | 76.68% |
1869 | Bass | Pale Ale (brewed 2nd Jan 1869) | 1065.9 | 1010 | 7.33 | 84.50% |
1869 | Bass | Pale Ale (brewed 24th Dec 1868 | 1065.4 | 1013 | 6.96 | 80.87% |
1869 | Bass | Pale Ale (brewed 27th Jan 1869) | 1066.7 | 1012 | 7.20 | 82.33% |
1869 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1067.0 | 1013 | 6.81 | 80.31% |
1869 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1056.5 | 1010 | 5.98 | 82.08% |
1870 | Bass | India Pale Ale | 1060.0 | |||
1880 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1055.2 | 1017 | 4.90 | 68.48% |
1887 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1064.2 | 1009 | 7.08 | 84.75% |
1887 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1063.5 | 1010 | 7.08 | 85.04% |
1888 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1069.6 | 1011 | 7.58 | 83.82% |
1888 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1069.0 | 1011 | 7.58 | 83.77% |
1896 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1060.8 | 1007 | 6.98 | 87.97% |
1898 | Bass | Pale Ale | 1064.9 | 1016 | 6.43 | 76.02% |
1901 | Bass | Dog's Head | 1065.6 | 1003 | 8.06 | 94.59% |
1901 | Bass | White Label | 1063.8 | 1007 | 7.25 | 87.73% |
1901 | Bass | draught Pale Ale | 1064.0 | 1013 | 6.48 | 78.03% |
Average | 1064.6 | 1011.9 | 6.89 | 81.51% | ||
Sources: | ||||||
The Lancet 1852, vol.1, 1852, page 474 | ||||||
British Medical Journal August 28th 1869, page 245 | ||||||
Wahl & Henius, pages 823-830 | ||||||
The Lancet 1852, vol.1, 1852, page 474 | ||||||
The lancet 1853, Volume 2, 1853, page 631. | ||||||
Bass price list | ||||||
Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs- und Genussmittel by Joseph König, 1889, page 835 | ||||||
Brockhaus' konversations-lexikon, Band 2 by F.A. Brockhaus, 1898 |
Can you shed any additional light on "Dog's Head" -- whether it has any special meaning, where it came from, anything else?
ReplyDeleteThis book includes a lot of detail from 1882 about a copyright fight over the use of "Dog's Head" but it's not clear to me if it's just a random, happenstance connection or if there is any fuller meaning.
https://books.google.com/books?id=wCIyAAAAIAAJ
Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteI thought it was the trademark of a specific bottler. I could be wrong.