Most London breweries – especially the ones that had made their name brewing Porter – had similar beers. The gravity obviously being set by the last set of price controls. 1055º puts it at the minimum OG for a beer in the 9d per pint class.
Surprisingly, as Barclay Perkins were enthusiastic users of both, there’s neither adjuncts nor sugar in the grist. Well, apart from roast barley. Oh, hang on a minute. On the brewing record it says in red ink “Special all malt brew for yeast”. That explains it, then. I wonder if drinkers noticed anything special about this batch?
The hops were a little on the old side, but had all been kept in a cold store: Mid Kent from 1919 and 1920, Pacific from 1920.
1922 Barclay Perkins BS | ||
mild malt | 9.00 lb | 69.23% |
brown malt | 1.00 lb | 7.69% |
amber malt | 1.00 lb | 7.69% |
crystal malt 60 L | 1.00 lb | 7.69% |
roast barley | 1.00 lb | 7.69% |
Cluster 120 mins | 1.75 oz | |
Fuggles 60 mins | 1.50 oz | |
Fuggles 30 mins | 1.75 oz | |
OG | 1055 | |
FG | 1017 | |
ABV | 5.03 | |
Apparent attenuation | 69.09% | |
IBU | 74 | |
SRM | 27 | |
Mash at | 154º F | |
Sparge at | 170º F | |
Boil time | 120 minutes | |
pitching temp | 60º F | |
Yeast | Wyeast 1099 Whitbread Ale |
The above is an excerpt from Armistice,
my wonderful book on brewing in WW I.
With this many IBU, should this be aged for 6 months? Side question, what is the lowest ABV porter/stout to get 6 month aging?
ReplyDeleteAnonymous,
ReplyDeleteI doubt this was aged for any length of time. No more than a few weeks, at most.
5.5% is about the weakest Porter or Stout that was meant to be aged.
So this was a batch of 'good stuff' for a yeast harvest?
ReplyDeleteStuartP,
ReplyDeleteno, this was their standard draught Stout. By 1922 gravities had stabilised at their interwar level.