Most of the time there was only one sugar, No. 1 invert. The exception was in 1940, when they briefly used something called DM in addition. No idea what it was, other than that it was a proprietary sugar. At the start of the was sugar made up 15% of the grist, but after a year that fell to 9-11%. Presumably this was dictated by the amount of sugar they were allocated by the government.
Before the war, Whitbread employed no unmalted adjuncts, just malt and sugar. That changed during the war due to government demands. The type of adjunct used was also determined by the government. Mostly it was in the form of flaked barley, except in 1943 when there had been a bumper oats crop and the government directed some of the surplus for brewing. Not being great fans of adjuncts, Whitbread dropped flaked barley in autumn 1946, probably as soon as it was able to.
Like Barclay Perkins, Whitbread employed English hops, mostly from Kent, but also ones from Worcester and Sussex. They were usually from two or three different years. This wasn’t a result of the war but something they had practiced during the interwar years. As those from older harvests had been kept in a cold store, they would have retained most of their alpha acid.
Just before the end of the war some Oregon hops pop up. Presumably the shipping situation had improved sufficiently for imports of hops to resume.
There was little variation in the colour of PA. It was usually 25-26, which is about what you would expect for a beer of this type.
Whitbread PA grists 1939 - 1945 | |||||||
Date | Year | OG | pale malt | PA malt | crystal malt | no. 1 sugar | DM sugar |
27th Sep | 1939 | 1048.2 | 24.06% | 56.15% | 4.81% | 14.97% | |
23rd Apr | 1940 | 1047.2 | 14.44% | 65.78% | 4.81% | 14.97% | |
14th Aug | 1940 | 1043.1 | 14.33% | 64.04% | 5.90% | 11.24% | 4.49% |
6th Feb | 1941 | 1042.9 | 14.59% | 69.73% | 4.86% | 10.81% | |
30th Jan | 1942 | 1040.0 | 76.65% | 3.30% | 10.99% | ||
29th May | 1942 | 1038.6 | 76.24% | 4.97% | 8.84% | ||
3rd Apr | 1943 | 1038.5 | 4.97% | 67.96% | 4.97% | 8.84% | |
22nd Feb | 1944 | 1039.1 | 72.47% | 6.74% | 8.99% | ||
4th Apr | 1945 | 1039.4 | 66.57% | 8.43% | 12.36% | ||
Sources: | |||||||
Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numbers LMA/4453/D/01/107, LMA/4453/D/01/108, LMA/4453/D/01/109, LMA/4453/D/01/110, LMA/4453/D/01/111 and LMA/4453/D/01/112. |
Whitbread PA adjuncts 1939 - 1945 | ||||||
Date | Year | OG | flaked barley | barley meal | flaked rye | flaked oat |
27th Sep | 1939 | 1048.2 | ||||
23rd Apr | 1940 | 1047.2 | ||||
14th Aug | 1940 | 1043.1 | ||||
6th Feb | 1941 | 1042.9 | ||||
30th Jan | 1942 | 1040.0 | 9.07% | |||
29th May | 1942 | 1038.6 | 5.80% | 0.83% | 3.31% | |
3rd Apr | 1943 | 1038.5 | 13.26% | |||
22nd Feb | 1944 | 1039.1 | 11.80% | |||
4th Apr | 1945 | 1039.4 | 12.64% | |||
Sources: | ||||||
Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numbers LMA/4453/D/01/107, LMA/4453/D/01/108, LMA/4453/D/01/109, LMA/4453/D/01/110, LMA/4453/D/01/111 and LMA/4453/D/01/112. |
Whitbread PA hops 1939 - 1945 | ||||
Date | Year | OG | hops | colour |
27th Sep | 1939 | 1048.2 | Worcester (1938), MK (1937 CS), EK (1937 CS), Sussex (1936 CS) | 22 |
23rd Apr | 1940 | 1047.2 | MK (1937 CS, 1938 CS, 1939) and EK (1938 CS) | 26.5 |
14th Aug | 1940 | 1043.1 | MK (1937 CS, 1938 CS), EK (1938 CS, 1939) | 25 |
6th Feb | 1941 | 1042.9 | MK (1937 CS, 1939), EK(1940) | 26 |
30th Jan | 1942 | 1040.0 | MK (1938 CS, 1941), EK (1938 CS, 1939 CS), Worcester (1940), samples | 22.5 |
29th May | 1942 | 1038.6 | MK (1941), EK (1939 CS, 1941) | 26 |
3rd Apr | 1943 | 1038.5 | MK (1941, 1942), Kent (1941), samples (1941) | 26 |
22nd Feb | 1944 | 1039.1 | MK (1942, 1943), EK (1941) | 25 |
4th Apr | 1945 | 1039.4 | MK (1942, 1943, 1944), Oregon (1942) | 26 |
Sources: | ||||
Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numbers LMA/4453/D/01/107, LMA/4453/D/01/108, LMA/4453/D/01/109, LMA/4453/D/01/110, LMA/4453/D/01/111 and LMA/4453/D/01/112. |
DM = Dxxxx maize? Maize would be pretty typical of a southern brewery at that time, no? Or = dry malt? but would be weird to use it in quantity.
ReplyDeleteUsing crystal in 1928 suggests it's a bit more than just a response to the thinning out during the war, although obviously 1928 wasn't exactly a happy time either. I always wondered if it was in part a response to changing barley varieties, an attempt to hark back to the flavour of beer made with Chevallier when less flavoursome varieties of barley were introduced.
Another thought is that it roughly coincides with the Mackeson acquisition, were Mackeson using crystal before they were bought?
qq,
ReplyDeleteDM is in the sugar column. It has to be a type of sugar.
Changing barley varieties, or malting techniques, could have been the reason for adding crystal malt. Or not wanting to use caramel to colour. There are lots of possible reasons. Customers wanting a sweeter beer is another one.
Most likely it was the result of a combination of factors. It's one where, for once, government fiddling doesn't seem to have played a part.
Hi Ron ,
ReplyDeleteCould it be something as simple as Duttson`s Mauritius or similar ??
Cheers
Edd