Here's a recipe from it . . .
Whitbread tinkered with their range of beers during the war. Mostly dropping beers. But there was one new arrival, Imperial.
Imperial was a replacement for Whitbread’s two strong Stouts, SS and SSS. This beer, brewed in March 1918, was one of the last brews, with only four coming after it. It was the end of really strong Stouts at Whitbread.
The grist has the same components as all Whitbread’s Black Beers: pale, brown and black malt plus No. 3 invert sugar. The proportion of roasted malts is slightly smaller than in London Stout, but not drastically so.
The hops used are exactly the same as in their Porter: Mid-Kent (1915 Cold Store, 1916) and Pacific (1913). Not that surprising as this beer was parti-gyled with Porter. Given the age of the hops, I’ve reduced the quantity in the recipe by quite a lot.
1918 Whitbread Imperial Stout | ||
pale malt | 10.75 lb | 65.43% |
brown malt | 2.50 lb | 15.22% |
black malt | 1.43 lb | 8.70% |
No. 3 invert sugar | 1.75 lb | 10.65% |
Cluster 105 mins | 1.50 oz | |
Fuggles 60 mins | 1.50 oz | |
Fuggles 30 mins | 1.50 oz | |
OG | 1073 | |
FG | 1028 | |
ABV | 5.95 | |
Apparent attenuation | 61.64% | |
IBU | 57 | |
SRM | 47 | |
Mash at | 146º F | |
Sparge at | 170º F | |
Boil time | 105 minutes | |
pitching temp | 57º F | |
Yeast | Wyeast 1099 Whitbread Ale |
ah - new book..!! what's that going to be..? the "big thing"..? cheers Peter
ReplyDeleteRaoul Duke,
ReplyDeleteI would have though the theme was obvious, given the date of the recipe and the fact that it will appear in November. If you call 600 pages big, then it will be big.
Ron,
ReplyDeleterevolutionary - keep us posted..!!
The malt bill is a bit different from the one in Porter!
ReplyDeleteMore malt but same gravity?
StuartP,
ReplyDeletethat's an old recipe in Porter! I calculate the malt bill differently now.
It will be the Beer Book to End All Beer Books ...
ReplyDeleteCan you update the recipes in my book, please?
ReplyDeleteTa.
More seriously, how do I correct the malt quantities in Porter! to get them right?
ReplyDeleteStuartP,
ReplyDeletefor the recipes in Porter, I just scaled down the quantities in the records. Of course, Whitbread would have got way better efficiency than you do. Probably around 90%. Just adjust that down to whatever your efficiency is.
It has gone a bit weird - the increase in pale malt is much less than in the increase in brown malt and black malt.
ReplyDeleteStuartP,
ReplyDeleteI suspect then that I used volume quarters in the first recipe (around 250 lbs for brown and black malt) and weight quarters (336 lbs) in the second.
So, gone all to cock, then?
ReplyDelete