Based on their brew length of around 150 barrels, I estimate their annual production was between 40,000 and 50,000 barrels. To put that into perspective, in 1917 Whitbread brewed 578,502 barrels.* And they weren’t even the largest brewery in London.
Kidd brewed a range of six beers in early 1917, most likely fewer than they had been making at the start of the war. As the war progressed breweries gradually discontinued less popular beers and ones with high gravities. By the time the war ended, many were just brewing four or five beers.
Surprisingly, the weakest beer of the bunch is the only Pale Ale, BB. Which I’m guessing stood for Best Bitter. Both BB and XXXX were very heavily hopped. 14-15 lbs per quarter is about as high as a hopping rate got at that time. The other beers all have a similar level of hopping as equivalent London beers. And London was well-known for hoppy beers.
These are the Kidd beers:
Kidd beers in early 1917 | ||||||||||||
Date | Year | Beer | Style | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl | boil time (hours) | Pitch temp | |
19th Mar | 1917 | X | Mild | 1044.3 | 1013.9 | 4.03 | 68.75% | 8.00 | 1.52 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 59º |
16th Feb | 1917 | SXXX | Mild | 1052.6 | 1018.0 | 4.58 | 65.79% | 8.98 | 2.07 | 2.5 | 2 | 59º |
15th Mar | 1917 | BB | Pale Ale | 1038.2 | 1011.1 | 3.59 | 71.01% | 14.08 | 2.30 | 2.5 | 2 | 59º |
20th Mar | 1917 | Porter | Porter | 1044.9 | 1015.0 | 3.96 | 66.67% | 8.00 | 1.67 | 2.5 | 59º | |
6th Feb | 1917 | Stout | Stout | 1062.6 | 1018.8 | 5.79 | 69.91% | 9.00 | 2.28 | 2 | 59º | |
23rd Mar | 1917 | XXXX | Strong Ale | 1069.8 | 1023.3 | 6.16 | 66.67% | 15.00 | 4.65 | 2.5 | 2 | 59º |
Source: | ||||||||||||
Kidd brewing record held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number ACC/305/16/013. |
As I’ve already mentioned Whitbread, let’s use them as a contextualising tool. In early 1917, they were brewing 8 beers. Well, 7 really as LS (London Stout) was identical to their Porter. The one Mild that Whitbread brewed fell inbetween the two of Kidd. Though they didn’t brew much of the SXXX.
Whitbread beers in late 1916 and early 1917 | ||||||||||||
Date | Year | Beer | Style | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | lbs hops/ qtr | hops lb/brl | boil time (hours) | Pitch temp | |
1st Feb | 1917 | X | Mild | 1046.5 | 1007.0 | 5.23 | 84.96% | 4.83 | 0.98 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 60º |
21st Feb | 1917 | IPA | IPA | 1046.5 | 1010.0 | 4.83 | 78.51% | 11.94 | 2.42 | 1.5 | 1.75 | 60º |
15th Feb | 1917 | PA | Pale Ale | 1050.1 | 1012.0 | 5.05 | 76.07% | 9.84 | 2.13 | 1.5 | 2 | 60º |
15th Nov | 1916 | P | Porter | 1050.4 | 1011.0 | 5.21 | 78.18% | 5.80 | 1.34 | 1.5 | 1.75 | 61º |
15th Nov | 1916 | LS | Stout | 1050.4 | 1011.0 | 5.21 | 78.18% | 5.80 | 1.34 | 1.5 | 1.75 | 61º |
14th Mar | 1917 | SS | Stout | 1076.0 | 1024.0 | 6.87 | 68.40% | 7.07 | 2.48 | 1.75 | 1.83 | 57º |
14th Mar | 1917 | SSS | Stout | 1092.2 | 1035.0 | 7.57 | 62.04% | 7.07 | 3.01 | 1.75 | 1.83 | 57º |
13th Feb | 1917 | KKK | Stock Ale | 1069.8 | 1024.0 | 6.06 | 65.62% | 9.62 | 2.99 | 1.5 | 2 | 57º |
Source: | ||||||||||||
Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numbers LMA/4453/D/01/082 and LMA/4453/D/09/111. |
Whitbread’s Porter and Stouts are of a higher gravity than Kidd’s, though the hopping rate is lower. In fact all of Kidd’s beers are more heavily hopped than their Whitbread equivalents. Maybe it was something to do with being located in Kent. Though Shepherd Neame, another Kent brewer, had very low hopping rates.
The other big difference between the two breweries is the boil times, which were quite a bit longer at Kidd. Most breweries reduced their boil times during WW I as part of a deal with the government. Brewers promised to reduce their coal usage in return for not being nationalised.
* Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numbers LMA/4453/D/01/082 and LMA/4453/D/09/111.
The difference in hopping rates is interesting. Maybe some Kent brewers thought "we have access to great hops, let's use a lot of them and extract all the bitterness and flavor we can" while others thought "we have access to great hops, so we can use less of them and still get the effect we want"?
ReplyDeleteCD,
ReplyDeleteit could be connected withe the breweries' locations: Dartford is just outside London, whereas Faversham is much more distant. The influence of London brewing was likely greater in Dartford.