Maybe it’s because it comes from the South, which I associate with Lager brewing. Whatever the reason, it is a little strange. Time to put that right.
Searching through my various spreadsheets, I see that I’ve a rather limited number of analyses of this type of wheat beer. I suppose I shouldn’t be that surprised. This type Weissbier was quite obscure in the 19th century, produced by a small number of breweries in pretty small quantities. It’s only in the last 30 years of so that the style has been available throughout Germany.
It also used to be exclusively brewed by specialist outfits. Now a large percentage of Bavarian breweries, ones that originally only brewed bottom-fermenting beers. It’s simple economics. The market for Weissbier has been expanding and brewers don’t want to miss out. Weissbier’s share rose from less than 2% in 1981 to almost 8% in 2010. In the southern States, Baden Württemberg and Bavaria, the market share is more than double that.
German beer sales by type 1981 - 2010 | ||||||||
Beer type | 1981 | 1989 | 1994 | 2000 | 2003 | 2005 | 2008 | 2010 |
Pils | 48.5 | 57.5 | 66 | 67.9 | 62 | 57.9 | 55.2 | 55.1 |
Export/Edel/Spezial | 20.8 | 10.9 | 9.7 | 9 | 9.6 | 10.4 | 9.8 | 9.8 |
Weizen | 1.4 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 5.7 | 7.1 | 7.9 | 8.3 | 7.9 |
Sources: | ||||||||
Brauwelt Brevier 2003 | ||||||||
Deutscher Brauer-Bund, Bonn | ||||||||
Brauwelt nr. 46-47 (2006) page 1431 |
Here are the few analyses from the 19th century that I have:
Bavarian Weissbier 1866 - 1899 | |||||||||
Year | Brewer | Town | Beer | OG Plato | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | Acidity |
1866 | Unknown | Munich | Weissbier | 11.62 | 1046.6 | 1012.9 | 4.38 | 72.32% | |
1888 | Röckl | Munich | Weissbier | 12.38 | 1049.8 | 1014 | 4.65 | 71.89% | 0.158 |
1888 | Schneider | Munich | Weissbier | 12.52 | 1050.4 | 1015.9 | 4.46 | 68.45% | 0.171 |
1888 | Schramm | Munich | Weissbier | 12.99 | 1052.4 | 1016.2 | 4.69 | 69.08% | 0.149 |
1899 | Unknown | Munich | Weissbier | 12.59 | 1050.7 | 1016.4 | 4.44 | 67.65% | |
Average | 12.42 | 1050.0 | 1015.1 | 4.52 | 69.88% | 0.159 | |||
Source: | |||||||||
König, J (1903), Bier in Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs- und Genussmittel by Joseph König, 1903, pp 1101 - 1156, Julius Springer, Berlin. |
What can we learn from that? The OGs are pretty low, as is the rate of attenuation. But how they compare to today? Let’s take a look:
Bavarian Hefeweizen in 2014 | |||||||
Brewer | Town | Beer | OG Plato | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation |
Ammerndorfer Bier Dorn Bräu | Ammerndorf | Hefe Weisse | 13.2 | 1053.3 | 1014 | 5.10 | 73.72% |
Hermann Sigwart | Weißenburg | Kirchweihweizen | 13.2 | 1053.3 | 1011.1 | 5.50 | 79.17% |
Hermann Sigwart | Weißenburg | Weißenburger Weiße | 12.9 | 1052.0 | 1012.8 | 5.10 | 75.39% |
Göller | Zeil am Main | Steinhauer Weisse | 12.8 | 1051.6 | 1010.2 | 5.40 | 80.32% |
Püls-bräu | Stadtsteinach | Weismainer Weisse | 12.8 | 1051.6 | 1011.6 | 5.20 | 77.51% |
Brauerei Kanone Löhr | Schnaittach | Weizen (hell) | 12.8 | 1051.6 | 1013.9 | 4.90 | 73.15% |
Weihenstephan | Freising | Hefeweissbier Leicht | 12.7 | 1051.2 | 1010.5 | 5.30 | 79.48% |
Arnsteiner Brauerei | Seinsheim | Hefe-Weissbier | 12.7 | 1051.2 | 1012.7 | 5.00 | 75.18% |
Kulmbacher Brauerei | Kulmbach | Hefeweissbier Leicht | 12.7 | 1051.2 | 1010.5 | 5.30 | 79.48% |
Kitzmann-Bräu | Erlangen | Weißbier | 12.6 | 1050.7 | 1007.9 | 5.60 | 84.53% |
Paulaner | Munich | Hefe-Weißbier Naturtrüb | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1008.2 | 5.50 | 83.70% |
Hacker-Pschorr | Munich | Hefe Weisse | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1008.2 | 5.50 | 83.70% |
Hacker-Pschorr | Munich | Sternweisse | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1008.2 | 5.50 | 83.70% |
Klosterbrauerei Andechs | Andechs | Weissbier Hell | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1008.2 | 5.50 | 83.70% |
Göller | Zeil am Main | Kaiser Heinrich Urweisse hell | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1010.4 | 5.20 | 79.43% |
Distelhäuser | Tauberbischofsheim | Hefeweizen | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1008.9 | 5.40 | 82.31% |
Brauhaus Leikeim | Altenkunstadt | Steinweisse | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1008.2 | 5.50 | 83.70% |
Brauerei Reblitz | Bad Staffelstein | Nedensdorfer Hefeweizen | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1012.6 | 4.90 | 74.96% |
Hermann Sigwart | Weißenburg | Hefe-Weizen | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1012.6 | 4.90 | 74.96% |
Bürgerbräu Hersbruck | Hersbruck | Albweizen | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1011.1 | 5.10 | 77.94% |
Brauerei Hofmann | Pahres | Weißbier | 12.4 | 1049.9 | 1010 | 5.20 | 79.96% |
Brauhaus Leikeim | Altenkunstadt | Helle Weiße | 12.3 | 1049.5 | 1008.1 | 5.40 | 83.63% |
Pyraser Landbrauerei | Thalmässing | Angerwirts Weizen | 12.2 | 1049.1 | 1009.2 | 5.20 | 81.35% |
Albertshöfer Sternbräu | Albertshofen | Weizenbier | 12.1 | 1048.6 | 1010.2 | 5.00 | 79.03% |
Privatbrauerei Kesselring | Marktsteft | Schlemmer Weißbier | 12 | 1048.2 | 1007.6 | 5.30 | 84.24% |
Braugasthof Grosch | Rödental | Grosch Weissbier | 12 | 1048.2 | 1009.8 | 5.00 | 79.67% |
Löwenbräu | Munich | Weisse | 11.8 | 1047.4 | 1007.5 | 5.20 | 84.17% |
Wolf | Zeil am Main | Land Weisse | 11.6 | 1046.5 | 1008.2 | 5.00 | 82.38% |
Zum Löwenbräu Flair Hotel | Adelsdorf | Aischgründer Karpfen-Weisse | 12.9 | 1052.0 | 1011.3 | 5.30 | 78.27% |
Average | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1010.1 | 5.24 | 79.96% | ||
Sources: | |||||||
The relevant brewery websites |
Now isn’t that interesting? The average OG is almost identical. You couldn’t say that about many styles when comparing the 19th century to today. But the big difference in the rate of attenuation means that modern versions 0.75% ABV stronger on average. That isn’t a surprise. One of the biggest changes in German beer is the increased rate of attenuation.
In many styles this has been accompanied by a drop in OG. If you look at Pils, the rate of attenuation has increased, but the ABV has remained the same. With the system in place in Germany, where the tax is calculated on the OG of the beer, there’s a financial incentive to keep the OG as low as you can. No surprise that that’s exactly what breweries have done.
Weizenbock next.
Glad to see weissbier making an appearance on the blog and looking forward to the weizenbock numbers! I imagine the increase in attenuation is because of improved yeast handling rather than changes in mashing or grain modification?
ReplyDelete